本文選題：新觀念反思 + 小說學(xué)術(shù)史�。� 參考：《河北學(xué)刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代意義上的中國古代小說研究已有上百年的歷史,經(jīng)過幾代學(xué)人的精耕細(xì)作,在小說作者、版本考證、文體與類型的探討、文本的解讀、小說史的編纂、小說理論的闡釋等方面都取得了令人矚目的成就。隨著新的文獻(xiàn)資料的發(fā)現(xiàn),新的理論和方法的引進(jìn)以及新的科技手段的運(yùn)用,不但有新的學(xué)術(shù)領(lǐng)域和問題的出現(xiàn),已有的學(xué)術(shù)結(jié)論也需要重新審視。本欄目將陸續(xù)推出幾組論文,對小說觀念、小說類型、小說批評、小說創(chuàng)作等問題進(jìn)行深刻反思和深入探索。王齊洲教授的論文《〈漢書·藝文志〉與〈隋書·經(jīng)籍志〉小說觀念之比較》探討了中國早期的小說觀念,認(rèn)為《漢志》和《隋志》雖不是文體分類,其中卻有文體因子。二志都強(qiáng)調(diào)其所著錄的小說作品提供了民情風(fēng)俗和百姓對政教的意見,具有民間性、通俗性、瑣碎性特點(diǎn),但都沒有強(qiáng)調(diào)故事性和虛構(gòu)性,與現(xiàn)代小說觀念頗有差異。傅承洲教授的《清代才學(xué)小說是否構(gòu)成一個(gè)小說類型》對當(dāng)下流行的才學(xué)小說類型概念提出了異議,認(rèn)為從才學(xué)小說概念形成過程和小說類型構(gòu)成要件的角度考察,《野叟曝言》、《囯史》、《燕山外史》和《鏡花緣》四部小說并不能構(gòu)成一個(gè)小說類型。四部小說從內(nèi)容到形式均不相同,很難歸入一類。炫才是文人創(chuàng)作小說的一種非常普遍的現(xiàn)象,不能成為小說類型的構(gòu)成要件。幾位學(xué)者都對古代小說的一些重要問題提出了新的看法,也許并不是定論,但定會(huì)對古代小說研究者有所啟發(fā),對古代小說與小說批評的研究有所推進(jìn)。
[Abstract]:The study of ancient Chinese novels in the modern sense has a history of more than one hundred years. After several generations of scholars' intensive and meticulous works, the author of the novel, the textual research of the edition, the discussion of style and type, the interpretation of the text, the compilation of the history of the novel, Great achievements have been made in the interpretation of novel theory. With the discovery of new literature, the introduction of new theories and methods and the application of new scientific and technological means, there are not only new academic fields and problems, but also the existing academic conclusions need to be re-examined. This column will launch several series of papers one after another to deeply reflect on and explore the problems of novel concept, novel type, novel criticism, novel creation and so on. Professor Wang Qizhou's paper, "A comparison of the ideas of Art and Literature in Chinese calligraphy and Records of the Sui Dynasty", probes into the ideas of early Chinese novels, and holds that although "Han Zhi" and "Sui Zhi" are not stylistic classification, there are stylistic factors among them. Both of them emphasize that the novels they have written provide folk feelings and customs and people's opinions on politics and religion. They have the characteristics of folklore, popularity and triviality, but they do not emphasize the characteristics of stories and fictions, which are quite different from modern novel concepts. Professor Fu Chengzhou's "whether the Ching Dynasty Talent study Fiction constitutes a novel Type" disagrees with the popular concept of talent novel type at present. From the point of view of the formation process of the concept of the novel and the elements of the type of novel, it is concluded that the four novels, such as "the word of the Old Man", "the History of China", "the History of Yanshan" and "the Flower margin of Mirror", can not constitute a novel type. The four novels are different in content and form, so they are difficult to fall into one category. Dazzling is a very common phenomenon in literary fiction, and cannot be the constituent element of novel type. Several scholars have put forward some new views on some important problems of ancient novels, which may not be the final conclusion, but they will certainly enlighten the researchers of ancient novels and promote the study of ancient novels and their criticism.
【作者單位】： 中央民族大學(xué)文學(xué)與新聞傳播學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I207.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳萍;論清末民初的小說類型理論[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

2 李興陽;;晚清小說類型理論的流變與意義[J];湖北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

3 葛紅兵;;建構(gòu)中國小說類型學(xué)理論體系——小說類型學(xué)筆談(上)[J];時(shí)代文學(xué);2008年05期

4 張永祿;;“敘事語法”：小說類型學(xué)研究的一個(gè)重要概念[J];時(shí)代文學(xué);2008年05期

5 張永祿;;論陳平原的小說類型研究——兼論現(xiàn)代漢語小說類型研究[J];理論與創(chuàng)作;2007年06期

6 葛紅兵;;建構(gòu)中國小說類型學(xué)批評模式——小說類型學(xué)筆談(下)[J];時(shí)代文學(xué);2008年06期

7 胡全章;晚清新小說的獨(dú)特文體——作為小說類型的“翻新小說”[J];中州學(xué)刊;2005年03期

8 陳平原;論魯迅的小說類型研究[J];魯迅研究月刊;1991年09期

9 景凱旋;唐代小說類型考論[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期

10 王穎;;乾隆“文治”與小說類型的畸形發(fā)展[J];山東青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 李漢秋 方月興;齊裕q的小說類型研究[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2000年

2 許苗苗;網(wǎng)絡(luò)文學(xué)“打榜”之我見[N];文藝報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 許道軍;歷史記憶：建構(gòu)與模型——中國現(xiàn)代歷史小說類型研究[D];上海大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 丁茂遠(yuǎn);小說類型與敘述文本[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

2 饒曉勇;小說類型研究的多向度敞開[D];福建師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2071464