【摘要】：隨著機構投資者在我國資本市場上的蓬勃發(fā)展及其地位的迅速攀升,機構投資者在公司治理機制中所起到的作用日益受到大家的關注。介于目前越來越多的正規(guī)專業(yè)機構的引入,機構投資者是否能夠有效行駛其監(jiān)督權,對公司重大決策的制定會產生舉足輕重的影響。高管職位變更,尤其是高管的非自愿變更,作為公司的一項重大事件,會從某個角度上反映出公司績效變化以及公司管理情況。同樣通過這一決策的制定,也可以反映出公司管理者以及監(jiān)管者的態(tài)度,從而進一步能夠考量出作為監(jiān)管者新生力量的機構投資者,其參與公司治理的積極性究竟如何。然而,不同類型的機構投資者由于自身特點以及投資偏好的差異,并不是都有意愿或是有能力發(fā)揮其監(jiān)督管理作用,因此,機構投資者在公司治理中到底扮演著怎樣的角色,起到怎樣的作用,又與上市公司存在著怎樣的關系?本文將就如上問題進行實證分析研究。本文選擇高管職位變更這一研究視角,選取2011-2013年間滬深A股且發(fā)生過高管非自愿變更的上市公司為研究樣本,在將機構投資者劃分為壓力敏感型與壓力抵制型的基礎上,來進一步實證研究機構投資者參與公司治理對于高管職位變更這一公司重大決策的實際影響。經過實證研究分析后得到結果顯示,機構投資者整體持股比例越高,則因業(yè)績下滑而導致的高管非自愿變更的可能性越小,這表明機構投資者通常在公司治理中沒有起到積極有效的監(jiān)管作用;壓力敏感型機構投資者產生的影響不顯著;壓力抵制型機構投資者在持股比例較高的情況下,通常能積極地參與到公司治理中去。綜上所述,本文認為我國機構投資者參與公司治理的積極性與監(jiān)管力度還有待于進一步加強。
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of institutional investors in China's capital market and the rapid rise of their status, the role of institutional investors in the corporate governance mechanism has attracted more and more attention. At present, with the introduction of more and more formal professional institutions, whether the institutional investors can effectively drive their supervisory power will have a significant impact on the making of major decisions of the company. The change of executive position, especially the involuntary change of executive position, as a major event of the company, can reflect the change of the company's performance and the management of the company in a certain way. By making this decision, we can also reflect the attitude of corporate managers and regulators, so that we can further consider the enthusiasm of institutional investors, as the new forces of regulators, to participate in corporate governance. However, different types of institutional investors, due to their own characteristics and differences in investment preferences, are not willing or able to play their supervisory and managerial role. Therefore, what role does institutional investors play in corporate governance? What role does it play, and what kind of relationship does it have with listed companies? This article will carry on the empirical analysis research to the above question. In this paper, we choose the research perspective of senior management position change, and select listed companies with Shanghai and Shenzhen A shares which have changed executives involuntarily from 2011-2013 as the research sample, on the basis of classifying institutional investors as stress-sensitive and pressure-resistant. To further empirically study the actual impact of institutional investor participation in corporate governance on executive position change, which is a major decision of the company. After empirical analysis, the results show that the higher the proportion of institutional investors' overall ownership, the less likely it is for executives to change involuntarily as a result of performance decline. This shows that institutional investors usually do not play an active and effective regulatory role in corporate governance; The influence of pressure sensitive institutional investors is not significant, and pressure resistance institutional investors usually participate actively in corporate governance in the case of high shareholding ratio. To sum up, this paper believes that the enthusiasm and supervision of institutional investors to participate in corporate governance need to be further strengthened.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F272.91;F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王彬,張研;機構投資者與公司治理[J];國際金融研究;2001年07期

2 彭丁;楊長虹;;機構投資者、信息披露質量與公司績效[J];商業(yè)研究;2013年09期

3 王亞平;吳聯生;白云霞;;中國上市公司盈余管理的頻率與幅度[J];經濟研究;2005年12期

4 游家興;徐盼盼;陳淑敏;;政治關聯、職位壕溝與高管變更——來自中國財務困境上市公司的經驗證據[J];金融研究;2010年04期

5 王彩萍;;機構投資者對上市公司決策行為的影響研究——以中興通訊H股發(fā)行事件為例[J];科技管理研究;2007年03期

6 王永海;王鐵林;李青原;;機構投資者參與公司治理積極性的分析[J];南開管理評論;2007年01期

7 潘越;戴亦一;魏詩琪;;機構投資者與上市公司“合謀”了嗎:基于高管非自愿變更與繼任選擇事件的分析[J];南開管理評論;2011年02期

8 陸瑤;朱玉杰;胡曉元;;機構投資者持股與上市公司違規(guī)行為的實證研究[J];南開管理評論;2012年01期

9 宋玉;范敏虹;;機構投資者持股、未來盈余與股價信息含量——兼論證券投資基金和QFII的影響差異[J];華東經濟管理;2013年01期

10 劉星;吳先聰;;機構投資者異質性、企業(yè)產權與公司績效——基于股權分置改革前后的比較分析[J];中國管理科學;2011年05期

，

本文編號：2418848