【摘要】：自1994年中國正式加入互聯(lián)網(wǎng)以來,我國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的運(yùn)用呈飛速發(fā)展之勢。隨著公眾對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的運(yùn)用從最初簡單的信息傳遞逐漸發(fā)展到更加復(fù)雜的互動(dòng)形式,把原本分散的意見訴求通過互聯(lián)網(wǎng)凝聚成了強(qiáng)大的輿論壓力,虛擬社會(huì)矛盾順勢而生。我國現(xiàn)階段關(guān)于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)空間的相關(guān)研究多圍繞于虛擬社會(huì)與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)二者之間的關(guān)系,而對(duì)虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的研究尚未深入�，F(xiàn)實(shí)中不同利益主體間的矛盾通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬社會(huì)表達(dá)、衍生、變異的情況,就是虛擬社會(huì)矛盾。虛擬社會(huì)矛盾主要由主體、客體、內(nèi)容和載體四個(gè)要素構(gòu)成,是現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)矛盾的一種特殊表現(xiàn)形式,與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)矛盾既相互聯(lián)系又相互區(qū)別。虛擬社會(huì)矛盾具有主體特殊性、隨機(jī)突發(fā)性、交互多維性等特點(diǎn),可以分為單一型與復(fù)合型,爭論型與極化型,局域型與廣泛型等類型。虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的生成過程大致分為四個(gè)階段:發(fā)生——發(fā)展——高潮——后期。總的來說,虛擬社會(huì)矛盾對(duì)人類社會(huì)的影響?yīng)q如一把“雙刃劍”,既有正面作用,也有負(fù)面影響。根據(jù)現(xiàn)階段我國虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的現(xiàn)狀,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我國虛擬社會(huì)治理還存在著諸多問題,包括政府對(duì)虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的重要性認(rèn)識(shí)不足,虛擬社會(huì)矛盾治理的規(guī)范不完善,虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的治理達(dá)不到預(yù)期效果,虛擬社會(huì)與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)矛盾治理的整體性思維缺失等。我國虛擬社會(huì)矛盾治理不足的主要原因在于現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)矛盾凸顯對(duì)虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的頻發(fā)起到?jīng)Q定性作用,虛擬社會(huì)矛盾治理的頂層設(shè)計(jì)滯后以及虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的治理能力欠缺。我國虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的治理應(yīng)從多個(gè)角度同時(shí)展開,橫向上應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持虛擬社會(huì)矛盾與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)矛盾的互動(dòng)結(jié)合;縱向上應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的防控與應(yīng)急雙管齊下;同時(shí),還要堅(jiān)持從道德、法律、運(yùn)行機(jī)制等多個(gè)層面對(duì)虛擬社會(huì)矛盾進(jìn)行標(biāo)本兼治,盡快建立健全關(guān)于我國虛擬社會(huì)矛盾的規(guī)范體系和策略布局。
[Abstract]:Since China joined the Internet in 1994, the use of Internet in China has been developing rapidly. With the public use of the Internet from the initial simple information transmission to a more complex form of interaction, the original scattered opinions through the Internet condensed into a strong pressure of public opinion, virtual social contradictions. At present, the research on Internet space in China is mainly focused on the relationship between virtual society and real society, but the research on the contradiction of virtual society has not been deepened. In reality, the contradictions between different stakeholders are expressed, derived and mutated through the network virtual society, which is the virtual social contradiction. The virtual social contradiction is mainly composed of four elements: subject, object, content and carrier. It is a special manifestation of the social contradiction, and it is not only related to but also different from the real social contradiction. The contradiction of virtual society is characterized by the particularity of the subject, the randomness of the society and the multi-dimensional interaction, which can be divided into single type and compound type, arguing type and polarization type, local type and extensive type, etc. The forming process of virtual social contradiction is divided into four stages: occurrences-development-climax-late stage. In general, the impact of virtual social contradictions on human society is like a "double-edged sword", which has both positive and negative effects. According to the present situation of the virtual social contradiction in our country, we can find that there are still many problems in our country's virtual society governance, including the government's insufficient understanding of the importance of the virtual social contradiction, the imperfect standard of the virtual social contradiction management. The management of virtual social contradictions can not achieve the expected effect, and the holistic thinking of the management of virtual and realistic social contradictions is missing. The main reason for the insufficient governance of the virtual social contradictions in China lies in the fact that the highlight of the real social contradictions plays a decisive role in the frequent occurrence of the virtual social contradictions. The top level design of the virtual social contradictions governance lags behind and the management ability of the virtual social contradictions is lacking. The management of the virtual social contradiction in our country should be carried out simultaneously from many angles. Horizontally, the interactive combination of the virtual social contradiction and the real social contradiction should be adhered to; vertically, the prevention and control of the virtual social contradiction should be combined with the emergency; at the same time, It is also necessary to deal with the contradictions of virtual society from the aspects of morality, law, operation mechanism and so on, so as to establish and perfect the normative system and strategic layout of the contradictions of virtual society in our country as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 趙暉;虛擬社會(huì)與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的關(guān)系研究[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

2 崇維祥;;虛擬社會(huì)是現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)新的存在形式——以網(wǎng)絡(luò)沖突事件為例[J];合肥學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

3 何忠國;虛擬與現(xiàn)實(shí)的沖突及融合——虛擬世界的本質(zhì)、特征及其倫理考量[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年02期

4 鄒衍;走向虛擬社會(huì)的反思——關(guān)于因特網(wǎng)的矛盾分析[J];理論月刊;2001年08期

5 范國華;賈曉娜;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體性事件的預(yù)警機(jī)制[J];人民論壇;2010年32期

6 童大煥;;“遷怒”與網(wǎng)絡(luò)暴民及其他[J];中國社會(huì)導(dǎo)刊;2006年14期

7 謝俊貴;;網(wǎng)上虛擬社會(huì)建設(shè):必要與設(shè)想[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2010年06期

8 王臣;蘇曉明;;秦火火與立二拆四的網(wǎng)絡(luò)江湖[J];中國新聞周刊;2013年32期

，

本文編號(hào)：2189283