國象主導的社會治理：當代中國社會治理的發(fā)展模式與邏輯
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-29 19:45
【摘要】：進入新世紀以來,為了解決經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展面臨的難題,以科學發(fā)展觀、和諧社會和服務型政府的提出為標志,以解決社會問題、緩解社會矛盾,維護社會穩(wěn)定和社會秩序,改善民生,促進社會公平正義和社會發(fā)展為目標,中國提出社會建設和社會治理的重大政策議題。特別是2013年11月召開的十八屆三中全會提出“推進國家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化”,以及“推進社會領域制度創(chuàng)新,加快形成科學有效的社會治理體制”的治理目標,表明黨和國家開始逐步從國家治理的高度審視社會治理與社會建設問題。那么,如何認識、理解與解釋當代中國社會治理領域的復雜性?“國家主導的社會治理”是當代中國社會治理發(fā)展的階段性特征。這一發(fā)展模式主要依賴于國家的角色轉變和主動變革,以及推動的社會治理改革,反映了國家在推進社會治理中的積極、主動作為。但與此同時,這一模式更多依賴于國家制度供給的優(yōu)先性,并不可避免地存在國家管控的弊端�！皣抑鲗У纳鐣卫怼钡男纬�,其邏輯在于制度基礎---自我約束下的適應性：在中國分權體制下,處于委托代理關系中的中央政府通過地方分級管理體制、非正式制度運作合法化和積極推動橫向問責等方式,試圖引導和約束地方政府行為。地方政府在“代理者”、“自利者”和“服務者”等多種角色的平衡和交互作用下,最終形成在推動社會治理進程中的“選擇性”行為,表現(xiàn)為無論是自上而下的維穩(wěn)壓力,還是中央政府積極倡導的社會治理創(chuàng)新,地方政府都傾向于在兩者中努力做出能夠得到中央政府認可、默許的行為選擇。由此,中央政府與地方政府構成的具有不同偏好的行為體,表明國家并非鐵板一塊。國家對社會并非只具有單純的管控意圖,其宏觀政策取向和治理邏輯日趨制度化和策略性,而這也進一步引發(fā)社會在自我約束前提下的適應性反應,即既在國家劃定的范圍內(nèi)行動,又通過策略性行動為自身爭取更大的自主性空間。要真正突破“國家主導的社會治理”困境,使之成為未來中國社會治理發(fā)展的重要動力和資源,那么社會治理的成功經(jīng)驗與創(chuàng)新實踐的擴散和制度化是解決這一發(fā)展模式內(nèi)在限度的關鍵路徑。這一過程需要中央政府的認可和支持、符合地方發(fā)展實際且滿足地方官員的政績需求,并能夠反映地方民眾的偏好。由此,才能為社會治理創(chuàng)造更廣闊的空間。并且,推進社會治理體系的創(chuàng)新是一項系統(tǒng)性改革,改革中不僅要樹立公平正義的改革理念,還涉及良好社會基礎的構建、行政體制改革、財政體制改革、社會體制改革、社會政策改革,以及法治治理等一系列改革的推進。研究結果對未來中國社會治理的發(fā)展具有重要啟示：社會治理不僅僅被看作是中國應對社會問題的策略和政策工具,應該突破社會治理的工具意義。未來中國社會治理的發(fā)展是一個動態(tài)的過程,隨著社會治理因素的逐步增加,這些積極因素會成為未來中國走向社會治理的重要動力、積極的生長因素和轉型力量。
[Abstract]:Since the new century has entered the new century, in order to solve the problems faced by the economic and social development, it is marked by the Scientific Outlook on Development, harmonious society and the service type government, in order to solve social problems, alleviate social contradictions, maintain social stability and social order, improve people's livelihood, promote social justice and social development, and put forward social construction in China. And the major policy issues of social governance, especially in the third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, held in November 2013, proposed "promoting the modernization of the state governance system and governance capacity", as well as "promoting the innovation of the social system and accelerating the formation of a scientific and effective social governance system", which indicates that the party and the state have gradually begun to govern from the state. A high degree of scrutiny of social governance and social construction. Then, how to understand and explain the complexity of the social governance in contemporary China? "State led social governance" is a stage characteristic of the development of social governance in contemporary China. This development model is mainly dependent on the transformation of the role of the country and the active change, and the promotion of the development of the social governance in China. The reform of social governance reflects the positive and active role of the state in promoting social governance, but at the same time, this model is more dependent on the priority of the state system supply, and inevitably exists in the abuse of state control and control. The formation of "state led social governance" is based on the institutional basis -- adaptation under self-restraint. Under the system of Chinese decentralization, the central government, which is in the principal-agent relationship, tries to guide and restrict the behavior of the local government through the local hierarchical management system, the legalization of the informal system operation and the active promotion of lateral accountability. The balance of the role of the local government in the "agent", "self-interest" and "service" And under the interaction, the "selective" behavior in the process of social governance is finally formed. The local government is inclined to make an effort to make a tacit choice between the central government and the central government for the choice of "selective" behavior in the process of promoting social governance. The government and the local government, which have different preferences, show that the state is not an iron plate. The state does not have only a simple control intention for the society, and its macro policy orientation and governance logic are increasingly institutionalized and strategically, and this further triggering the adaptive response of society under the premise of self-restraint, that is, both in the state and in the state. In order to make a greater autonomy space for itself through strategic action, to truly break through the predicament of "state led social governance" and make it an important motive force and resource for the development of social governance in China in the future, the successful experience of social governance and the diffusion and institutionalization of new practice are the solution to this development. This process needs the central government's key path. This process needs the approval and support of the central government, meets the local development practice and meets the local officials' achievements needs, and can reflect the local people's preferences. In this way, it can create a broader space for social governance. And the innovation of the social governance system is a systematic reform. In the reform, we should not only establish a fair and just reform concept, but also involve the construction of a good social foundation, the reform of the administrative system, the reform of the financial system, the reform of the social system, the reform of social policy, and the governance of the rule of law. The results of the study have important inspiration for the development of China's social governance in the future: social governance not only The development of China's social governance in the future is a dynamic process. With the gradual increase of social governance factors, these positive factors will become an important motive force for the future Chinese social governance, the positive growth factors and the positive growth factors. Transformational power.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630
本文編號：2153791
[Abstract]:Since the new century has entered the new century, in order to solve the problems faced by the economic and social development, it is marked by the Scientific Outlook on Development, harmonious society and the service type government, in order to solve social problems, alleviate social contradictions, maintain social stability and social order, improve people's livelihood, promote social justice and social development, and put forward social construction in China. And the major policy issues of social governance, especially in the third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, held in November 2013, proposed "promoting the modernization of the state governance system and governance capacity", as well as "promoting the innovation of the social system and accelerating the formation of a scientific and effective social governance system", which indicates that the party and the state have gradually begun to govern from the state. A high degree of scrutiny of social governance and social construction. Then, how to understand and explain the complexity of the social governance in contemporary China? "State led social governance" is a stage characteristic of the development of social governance in contemporary China. This development model is mainly dependent on the transformation of the role of the country and the active change, and the promotion of the development of the social governance in China. The reform of social governance reflects the positive and active role of the state in promoting social governance, but at the same time, this model is more dependent on the priority of the state system supply, and inevitably exists in the abuse of state control and control. The formation of "state led social governance" is based on the institutional basis -- adaptation under self-restraint. Under the system of Chinese decentralization, the central government, which is in the principal-agent relationship, tries to guide and restrict the behavior of the local government through the local hierarchical management system, the legalization of the informal system operation and the active promotion of lateral accountability. The balance of the role of the local government in the "agent", "self-interest" and "service" And under the interaction, the "selective" behavior in the process of social governance is finally formed. The local government is inclined to make an effort to make a tacit choice between the central government and the central government for the choice of "selective" behavior in the process of promoting social governance. The government and the local government, which have different preferences, show that the state is not an iron plate. The state does not have only a simple control intention for the society, and its macro policy orientation and governance logic are increasingly institutionalized and strategically, and this further triggering the adaptive response of society under the premise of self-restraint, that is, both in the state and in the state. In order to make a greater autonomy space for itself through strategic action, to truly break through the predicament of "state led social governance" and make it an important motive force and resource for the development of social governance in China in the future, the successful experience of social governance and the diffusion and institutionalization of new practice are the solution to this development. This process needs the central government's key path. This process needs the approval and support of the central government, meets the local development practice and meets the local officials' achievements needs, and can reflect the local people's preferences. In this way, it can create a broader space for social governance. And the innovation of the social governance system is a systematic reform. In the reform, we should not only establish a fair and just reform concept, but also involve the construction of a good social foundation, the reform of the administrative system, the reform of the financial system, the reform of the social system, the reform of social policy, and the governance of the rule of law. The results of the study have important inspiration for the development of China's social governance in the future: social governance not only The development of China's social governance in the future is a dynamic process. With the gradual increase of social governance factors, these positive factors will become an important motive force for the future Chinese social governance, the positive growth factors and the positive growth factors. Transformational power.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 連玉明;;關于社會管理創(chuàng)新和社會體制改革的幾點認識[J];大連干部學刊;2012年06期
2 陳振明 ,李德國 ,蔡晶晶;政府社會管理職能的概念辨析——《“政府社會管理”課題的研究報告》之一[J];東南學術;2005年04期
3 敬NB嘉;陳若靜;;從協(xié)作角度看我國居家養(yǎng)老服務體系的發(fā)展與管理創(chuàng)新[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2009年05期
4 曹聞民;;論和諧治理與合作型政府治理模式構建[J];廣東行政學院學報;2007年01期
5 林尚立;;有效政治與大國成長——對中國三十年政治發(fā)展的反思[J];公共行政評論;2008年01期
6 侯一麟;;政府職能、事權事責與財權財力:1978年以來我國財政體制改革中財權事權劃分的理論分析[J];公共行政評論;2009年02期
7 黃冬婭;;多管齊下的治理策略:國家建設與基層治理變遷的歷史圖景[J];公共行政評論;2010年04期
8 陳天祥;中國地方政府制度創(chuàng)新的動因[J];管理世界;2000年06期
9 關信平;;改革開放30年中國社會政策的改革與發(fā)展[J];甘肅社會科學;2008年05期
10 趙靜;陳玲;薛瀾;;地方政府的角色原型、利益選擇和行為差異——一項基于政策過程研究的地方政府理論[J];管理世界;2013年02期
相關重要報紙文章 前2條
1 演講人 郁建興;[N];光明日報;2012年
2 上海市社科規(guī)劃“黨的十八大精神研究”課題組 執(zhí)筆人 陶希東;[N];學習時報;2013年
，本文編號：2153791
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2153791.html
最近更新
教材專著
