本文選題：社會組織 + 國家治理現(xiàn)代化　； 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：“推進(jìn)國家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化”是黨中央在新時期內(nèi)面對社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展提出的全新的總目標(biāo)總?cè)蝿?wù)。它的提出帶來了治理理念的變革,標(biāo)志著我國將逐步轉(zhuǎn)變一元主導(dǎo)的政府管理模式,加快建立多元為中心的社會治理模式。在推進(jìn)實(shí)現(xiàn)國家治理現(xiàn)代化目標(biāo)的進(jìn)程中,社會組織作為國家治理的多元主體之一發(fā)揮著重要的作用。本文的興趣點(diǎn)是在推進(jìn)國家治理現(xiàn)代化的大背景下,將社會學(xué)中的角色理論引入對社會組織的研究,通過對比新時期下社會組織的角色期望與現(xiàn)實(shí)體制下的角色實(shí)踐間的差距,找出社會組織發(fā)展困境的深層次原因。社會組織是組成公民社會的基本主體,并與政府部門有著千絲萬縷的聯(lián)系,具有服務(wù)和倡導(dǎo)功能。本文在對社會組織相關(guān)概念介紹和對社會組織分類的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合國內(nèi)外研究成果,對社會組織與公民社會及政府間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行論述,并概括總結(jié)了我國社會組織發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀。社會轉(zhuǎn)型期以來,中國的社會組織迅猛發(fā)展。不但在數(shù)量、發(fā)育水平上不斷提高,而且不斷發(fā)展形成一種集體行動和互動的整體性、結(jié)構(gòu)化的力量。新時期下,為推進(jìn)國家治理現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程,必須加快重組國家治理體系,實(shí)現(xiàn)國家治理體系的科學(xué)化、民主化、法治化;必須重視國家治理能力的提升,提高政府公信力,加強(qiáng)社會多元力量的協(xié)調(diào)合作,注重國家治理“軟能力”的培養(yǎng)。國家治理現(xiàn)代化理念的提出加劇了社會轉(zhuǎn)型,推進(jìn)了政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變,帶來了公民意識以及公民社會的成長,為社會組織的發(fā)展提供了新的歷史契機(jī)。新時期下由于社會轉(zhuǎn)型的加速帶來了政府與公民需求的不斷發(fā)展,從而對社會組織又有了新的角色期望。從政府的角度來看,社會組織不僅是政府改革的催化劑,公共服務(wù)的提供者,社會問題的“減震器”,而且變成了公民政治參與的載體。從公民的角度來看,社會組織不僅發(fā)揮著社會服務(wù)的基礎(chǔ)性功能,更是社會自治的推動者,政府權(quán)力的制約者,公共政策的參與者,弱勢群體的“保護(hù)傘”,公共精神的倡導(dǎo)者,等等。國家治理現(xiàn)代化背景下,政府與公民對社會組織給予了很大的期望,但在其實(shí)踐過程中,卻面臨著諸多困境,包括自身能力不足,行業(yè)分類不均衡,尤其是倡導(dǎo)型社會組織的缺失,大量弱勢“草根”組織存在于法外環(huán)境中等。究其原因,主要是社會組織存在的空間是國家讓渡出來的,天然弱勢;并且在“黨政一體”的體制下利益?zhèn)鬏敊C(jī)制的中國模式阻礙了社會組織倡導(dǎo)性功能的發(fā)揮;而國家政策的變動與現(xiàn)行社會組織相關(guān)行政法規(guī)的沖突也造成社會組織自身發(fā)展的矛盾。因此,為確保社會組織走出角色困境,發(fā)揮服務(wù)與倡導(dǎo)功能,必須從加快轉(zhuǎn)變觀念,健全社會組織利益?zhèn)鬏敊C(jī)制,優(yōu)化社會組織發(fā)展的法律制度環(huán)境,加強(qiáng)社會組織自身能力建設(shè)等方面進(jìn)行。國家治理現(xiàn)代化理念奠定了社會組織發(fā)展的制度基礎(chǔ),而社會組織的發(fā)展又進(jìn)一步促進(jìn)國家治理現(xiàn)代化目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn),二者之間互動雙贏。
[Abstract]:"Promoting the national governance system and the modernization of governance ability" is the new total goal of the Party Central Committee to face the rapid development of the social economy in the new period. Its proposal brings about the reform of the governance concept, which indicates that China will gradually change the government management mode dominated by the one yuan, and speed up the establishment of a multicultural social governance. In the process of promoting the goal of realizing the modernization of national governance, the social organization plays an important role as one of the multiple subjects of national governance. The interest point of this article is to introduce the role theory of sociology into the research of social organization under the background of promoting the modernization of national governance and to compare the society in the new period. The difference between the role of the organization and the practice of the role in the real system is expected to find out the deep reasons for the development of social organizations. The social organization is the basic body of the civil society, and has countless connections with the government departments, and has the functions of service and advocacy. This article introduces related concepts and social organizations to social organizations. On the basis of the classification, the relationship between social organizations and civil society and the government is discussed in combination with the research results at home and abroad, and the status of the development of social organizations in China is summarized and summarized. Since the period of social transformation, the social organization of China has developed rapidly. Not only in quantity but also in the development of social development, the development of social organization has been continuously developed and developed to form a kind of collective. In the new period, in order to promote the process of national governance and modernization, we must accelerate the restructuring of the national governance system, realize the scientific, democratic and legal system of the national governance system, and should pay more attention to the promotion of the national governance capacity, the government's credibility, and the coordination and cooperation of the social pluralistic forces. The idea of state governance "soft ability" has intensified the social transformation, promoted the transformation of the government's functions, brought about citizen consciousness and the growth of civil society, and provided a new historical opportunity for the development of social organization. From the point of view of the government, social organizations are not only the catalyst of government reform, the providers of public services, the "shock absorbers" of social problems, but also the carrier of civil political participation. From the angle of citizens, social organizations not only play the basis of social services. The basic function is the promoter of the social autonomy, the restrictive of the government power, the participants of the public policy, the umbrella of the disadvantaged group, the advocate of the public spirit, and so on. Under the background of the modernization of the state governance, the government and the citizens have given a great expectation to the social organization, but in the process of their practice, they are faced with many difficulties, including the difficulties in the process of practice. Inadequacy of its own ability and unbalance of industry classification, especially the lack of advocacy type social organization, a large number of disadvantaged "grassroots" organizations exist in the middle of the law environment. The main reason is that the space of the social organization is the country's alienation, the natural weakness, and the Chinese model of the benefit transmission mechanism under the "party and government" system. In order to ensure that social organizations go out of the role dilemma and give full play to the function of service and advocacy, the change of the state policy and the conflict of the existing administrative regulations related to the existing social organizations must be taken to ensure that the social organizations should change their ideas and improve the transmission machines of social organizations. To optimize the legal system environment of social organization development and to strengthen the construction of social organization's own capacity. The concept of state governance modernization has laid the foundation for the development of social organization, and the development of social organization further promotes the realization of the goal of national governance modernization, and the interaction of the two is mutually beneficial.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D632.9;D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭言;李猛;;推進(jìn)國家治理體系與國家治理能力現(xiàn)代化[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年02期

2 竹立家;;國家治理體系重構(gòu)與治理能力現(xiàn)代化[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報;2014年01期

3 楊雪冬;;社會治理是突破口[J];決策;2014年01期

4 儲建國;;國家治理現(xiàn)代化的新意[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);2013年36期

5 包穎;;用國家治理理念謀劃社會組織改革發(fā)展——專訪民政部民間組織管理局局長王建軍[J];中國社會組織;2013年12期

6 竹立家;;著力推進(jìn)國家治理現(xiàn)代化[J];中國黨政干部論壇;2013年12期

7 夏國永;;國外政府與社會組織合作治理的經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒與啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2012年06期

8 文軍;;中國社會組織發(fā)展的角色困境及其出路[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年01期

9 廖鴻;石國亮;;中國社會組織發(fā)展管理及改革展望[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

10 王名;孫偉林;;我國社會組織發(fā)展的趨勢和特點(diǎn)[J];中國非營利評論;2010年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 孫立平;;利益時代的沖突與和諧[N];南方周末;2004年

，

本文編號：2006303