本文選題：服務(wù)類社會組織 + 城市社區(qū)　； 參考：《重慶工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：全面深化改革的總目標(biāo)是完善和發(fā)展中國特色社會主義制度,推進國家治理體系和治理能力的現(xiàn)代化。在這樣的戰(zhàn)略背景下,社會治理體制的創(chuàng)新作為國家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化的組成部分被提上重要議程。社會治理體制的核心在社區(qū),現(xiàn)代社區(qū)治理是一個多元力量之間的共同參與治理。社會組織以其獨特的專業(yè)價值和社會功能,在創(chuàng)新社會治理體系中發(fā)揮著重要作用。近年來,越來越多的社會組織深入社區(qū),在提供專業(yè)服務(wù)、推動居民參與、促進社區(qū)發(fā)展等方面扮演著重要角色,成為轉(zhuǎn)變社區(qū)治理方式、推進社區(qū)治理體制創(chuàng)新的主要突破領(lǐng)域和方向。這不僅是社會體制改革和創(chuàng)新的必然要求,也是建設(shè)和諧社會的內(nèi)在需要。本文著眼于重慶市服務(wù)類社會組織運行發(fā)展的基本狀況,探討其在城市社區(qū)多元治理中的角色價值及作用,分析其運作過程及現(xiàn)實處境,思考其未來走向及策略。服務(wù)類社會組織作為社會組織的重要組成部分,其參與城市社區(qū)多元治理的基本層面表現(xiàn)在服務(wù),它是通過服務(wù)來實現(xiàn)治理的,這種服務(wù)既包括為社區(qū)居民提供的實際性的直接服務(wù),也包括以改變現(xiàn)狀而進行的政策倡導(dǎo)。因此,服務(wù)類社會組織參與城市社區(qū)多元治理是一種典型的服務(wù)型治理方式。本文正是基于服務(wù)型治理思路,把服務(wù)類社會組織與政府、社區(qū)居民置于社區(qū)治理體系中,這樣,服務(wù)類社會組織的“中介者”角色就能夠體現(xiàn)出來。本文按照“理論探討-實證調(diào)研-對策研究”邏輯順序,以治理理論、社會資本理論、社會生態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論為指導(dǎo),圍繞服務(wù)型治理思路構(gòu)建研究思路圖,呈現(xiàn)出服務(wù)類社會組織與政府、社區(qū)居民之間互動的維度:資源獲取與政策倡導(dǎo)、促進參與與推進自治。通過對重慶市48家服務(wù)類社會組織的實證調(diào)研,結(jié)合典型案例,分析探討服務(wù)類社會組織參與城市社區(qū)多元治理所面臨的現(xiàn)實問題及其形成原因,并結(jié)合實際提出未來可行的發(fā)展對策。通過實證調(diào)研的結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),目前重慶市服務(wù)類社會組織的發(fā)展還處于起步階段,服務(wù)型治理的理念還未形成、自身功能還未得到有效發(fā)揮。從長遠來看,服務(wù)類社會組織的發(fā)展是機遇與挑戰(zhàn)并存的。在創(chuàng)新社會治理的大背景下,引導(dǎo)服務(wù)類社會組織參與城市社區(qū)多元治理、有效發(fā)揮服務(wù)型治理功能,需要做到:樹立服務(wù)型治理的社區(qū)治理新理念,通過有效服務(wù)和政策倡導(dǎo)來增強服務(wù)類社會組織自身參與社區(qū)治理能力;加強自身能力建設(shè),提高服務(wù)的專業(yè)水平。同時,加大政府相關(guān)政策的扶持力度,提高社會公信力,為服務(wù)類社會組織的發(fā)展提供良好的生存環(huán)境;培育社區(qū)居民參與意識,促進居民自治。只有政府、服務(wù)類社會組織、社區(qū)居民之間實現(xiàn)良性互動,才能最終邁向服務(wù)型社區(qū)治理的目標(biāo),促進社區(qū)治理體制的改革和創(chuàng)新。
[Abstract]:The overall goal of deepening the reform in an all-round way is to perfect and develop the socialist system with Chinese characteristics and to promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. Under such strategic background, the innovation of social governance system is put on the important agenda as part of the modernization of national governance system and governance ability. The core of social governance system is community, modern community governance is the joint participation of multiple forces. With its unique professional value and social function, social organizations play an important role in innovating the social governance system. In recent years, more and more social organizations have penetrated into the community, playing an important role in providing professional services, promoting residents' participation and promoting community development. Promote community governance system innovation of the main breakthrough areas and directions. This is not only the inevitable requirement of social system reform and innovation, but also the inherent need of building a harmonious society. This paper focuses on the basic situation of the operation and development of the service social organization in Chongqing, probes into its role value and function in the pluralistic governance of the urban community, analyzes its operation process and realistic situation, and thinks about its future trend and strategy. As an important part of social organizations, service social organizations participate in the multiple governance of urban communities on the basic level of service, it is through services to achieve governance, This service includes both practical and direct services for community residents and policy advocacy to change the status quo. Therefore, the participation of service social organizations in urban community multiple governance is a typical service governance. Based on the idea of service-oriented governance, this paper puts the service social organization, the government and the community residents in the community governance system, so that the "intermediary" role of the service social organization can be reflected. According to the logical sequence of "theoretical discussion-empirical investigation-countermeasure research", this paper, guided by governance theory, social capital theory and social ecosystem theory, constructs the research thought map around the thought of service-oriented governance. It presents the dimensions of interaction between service social organizations, government and community residents: resource acquisition and policy advocacy, promotion of participation and promotion of autonomy. Based on the empirical investigation of 48 service social organizations in Chongqing and the typical cases, this paper analyzes the practical problems and the causes of the participation of service social organizations in the pluralistic governance of urban communities. And put forward the feasible development countermeasure in the future combined with the actual situation. The results of empirical investigation show that the development of service social organizations in Chongqing is still in its infancy, the concept of service-oriented governance has not been formed, and its own functions have not been effectively brought into play. In the long run, the development of service social organizations is both opportunities and challenges. Under the background of innovating the social governance, we should guide the service social organizations to participate in the pluralistic governance of the urban community and give full play to the function of the service-oriented governance. We should set up a new concept of community governance based on the service-oriented governance. Through effective service and policy advocacy to strengthen the ability of service social organizations to participate in community governance, strengthen their own capacity building, improve the professional level of service. At the same time, we should increase the support of government policies, improve social credibility, provide a good living environment for the development of service social organizations, cultivate community residents' participation consciousness, and promote residents' autonomy. Only when the government, the service social organization and the community residents can realize the benign interaction, can they finally move towards the goal of the service-oriented community governance and promote the reform and innovation of the community governance system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D669.3;D632.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊濤;黃弘椿;;城市社區(qū)復(fù)合化治理及其發(fā)展路徑——以南京市S街道J社區(qū)為例[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2016年03期

2 張歡;褚勇強;;社區(qū)服務(wù)是城市居民社區(qū)參與的“催化劑”嗎?——基于全國108個城市社區(qū)的實證研究[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年06期

3 徐林;許鹿;薛圣凡;;殊途同歸:異質(zhì)資源稟賦下的社區(qū)社會組織發(fā)展路徑[J];公共管理學(xué)報;2015年04期

4 丁霞;劉惠苑;張玉玲;;社區(qū)服務(wù)類社會組織發(fā)展研究——基于社區(qū)公共服務(wù)平臺建設(shè)層面的探討[J];黑河學(xué)刊;2015年07期

5 王思斌;;社區(qū)治理體制改革的基本問題與實踐[J];中國機構(gòu)改革與管理;2015年06期

6 王思斌;;社會工作機構(gòu)在社會治理創(chuàng)新中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)型服務(wù)治理[J];學(xué)海;2015年03期

7 李曉壯;;城市社區(qū)治理體制改革創(chuàng)新研究——基于北京市中關(guān)村街道東升園社區(qū)的調(diào)查[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2015年01期

8 楊君;徐選國;徐永祥;;邁向服務(wù)型社區(qū)治理:整體性治理與社會再組織化[J];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2015年03期

9 陳家喜;;反思中國城市社區(qū)治理結(jié)構(gòu)——基于合作治理的理論視角[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年01期

10 王名;蔡志鴻;王春婷;;社會共治:多元主體共同治理的實踐探索與制度創(chuàng)新[J];中國行政管理;2014年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張隆隆;社工機構(gòu)參與城市社區(qū)治理研究[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2015年

，

本文編號：2000092