本文選題：行政改革 + 行政層級　； 參考：《河北師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：黨的十八從八個方面提出了改革現(xiàn)有行政體制的戰(zhàn)略部署,行政層級改革位列其中,這是保證行政權(quán)力順利運轉(zhuǎn)的必要條件。要優(yōu)化行政層級,除了要優(yōu)化行政區(qū)劃設(shè)置,還要繼續(xù)在具備條件的地方試行省直管縣體制。推行省直管縣體制改革,有助于減少行政層級、提高行政效率、壯大縣域經(jīng)濟、推進城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展,目前,全國已有20多個省份在試驗省直管縣體制改革�？v觀學(xué)術(shù)界對省直管縣體制改革的研究,首先需要解決的就是概念混淆問題。在各省探索省直管縣體制改革實踐中,為保證穩(wěn)步推進,結(jié)合自身實際,進行了“財政省直管”、“強縣擴權(quán)”、“擴權(quán)強縣”的有益探索,可以說這些探索為省直管縣體制改革奠定了基礎(chǔ)。浙江省和海南省是推行省直管縣體制比較成功的省份。這二省的長期實踐,為其他省份開展改革提供了很多經(jīng)驗,但也不得不面臨一些由于管理幅度增大省級政府治理難度增大、責(zé)任與權(quán)力不對等、與現(xiàn)行體制不配套等共性問題。河北省的省直管縣體制改革有其特殊之處。2013年5月,省委省政府確定定州、辛集為河北省首批省直管縣體制改革試點,賦予定州、辛集省轄市級經(jīng)濟社會管理權(quán)限。2015年4月,省委省政府決定擴大試點范圍,新增遷安、寧晉、涿州、懷來、平泉、任丘、景縣、魏縣為擴大省直管縣體制改革試點縣。按照擴大試點的總體部署要求,2015年4月1日試點縣按新體制入軌試運行,10月1日實現(xiàn)正式運行。遺憾的是,在試運行半年后,河北省委省政府做出重新調(diào)整,新增的8個縣不再開展試點工作,重新劃歸所在地級市管理。河北省在省直管縣體制改革探索中,探索出了結(jié)合本省實際的改革模式、壯大了縣域經(jīng)濟、提高了行政效率、優(yōu)化生產(chǎn)力布局、推進城鎮(zhèn)化進程、推動了城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展,取得了一定的成績。但也存在一些問題,除了全國省直管縣體制改革普遍存在的共性問題外,還表現(xiàn)在欠缺長遠規(guī)劃、支持力度不大、市縣配合不到位等方面。究其原因,既有省級政府財政實力和管理能力存在不足、政策不配套,又不能忽略市級阻力、縣級主動作為能力欠缺的客觀事實。立足河北省省情,結(jié)合京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展的寶貴機遇,河北省的省直管縣體制改革應(yīng)該堅持持續(xù)適時推進,同時應(yīng)該繼續(xù)支持地級市的發(fā)展,調(diào)整行政區(qū)劃,確立“省直管縣+大都市區(qū)”為特征的行政區(qū)劃改革目標(biāo)。具體到省直管縣的發(fā)展上,既要加大對其的支持力度,包括縣域經(jīng)濟提質(zhì)增效、鼓勵萬眾創(chuàng)新、支持新型城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)、支持土地指標(biāo)等要素的保障、省直管縣體制改革等,還要完善綜合配套措施,包括鼓勵和支持垂直管理部門支持省直管縣體制改革、完善體制改革和暢通干部選拔任用等。
[Abstract]:The eighteen aspects of the Party put forward the strategic plan of reforming the existing administrative system, among which the reform of administrative hierarchy is the necessary condition to ensure the smooth operation of administrative power. In order to optimize the administrative hierarchy, we should continue to try out the provincial and county system where the conditions are available, in addition to optimizing the setting of administrative divisions. The implementation of the system reform of managing counties directly in provinces will help to reduce administrative levels, improve administrative efficiency, strengthen county economies, and promote the overall development of urban and rural areas. At present, more than 20 provinces in the country have been directly managing the system reform of counties in experimental provinces. Throughout the academic research on the reform of the county system, the first thing to be solved is conceptual confusion. In order to ensure steady progress in the practice of the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of the counties, and in combination with their own reality, the provinces have carried out beneficial explorations of "direct administration of the financial province", "strengthening county power", and "expanding the power and strengthening the county power". It can be said that these explorations have laid the foundation for the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of counties. Zhejiang Province and Hainan Province are more successful provinces in the implementation of provincial direct control of the county system. The long-term practice of these two provinces has provided a lot of experience for other provinces to carry out the reform, but they also have to face some common problems such as increasing the management range, increasing the difficulty of provincial government governance, unequal responsibility and power, and not matching with the current system. In May 2013, the provincial party committee and the provincial government decided on Dingzhou, and Xinji was the first batch of provincial directly administered county system reform pilot in Hebei Province, giving Dingzhou and Xinji municipal economic and social management authority. The provincial party committee and provincial government decided to expand the scope of the pilot, adding Qian'an, Ningjin, Zhuozhou, Huailai, Pingquan, Renqiu, Jingxian and Wei counties to expand the pilot counties in charge of county system reform. According to the overall deployment requirements of the expanded pilot, the pilot counties were put into trial operation according to the new system on April 1, 2015, and officially put into operation on October 1. Unfortunately, after six months of trial operation, the Hebei provincial government made a readjustment, the new eight counties no longer carry out pilot work, re-classified to the prefecture-level city management. In the exploration of the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of counties, Hebei Province has explored a reform model that combines the actual situation of the province, which has strengthened the county economy, improved administrative efficiency, optimized the distribution of productive forces, advanced the process of urbanization, and promoted the overall development of urban and rural areas. Some achievements have been made. However, there are also some problems. Besides the common problems in the system reform of the counties directly administered by the provinces, there are still some aspects such as the lack of long-term planning, the lack of support, the lack of coordination between cities and counties, and so on. The reasons are that the provincial government's financial strength and management ability are insufficient, the policy is not matched, and the city level resistance can not be ignored, and the county level initiative is the objective fact of the lack of capacity. Based on the situation in Hebei Province and the precious opportunities for the coordinated development between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, the system reform of the provinces directly in charge of the counties in Hebei Province should be promoted continuously and timely, and at the same time, it should continue to support the development of prefecture-level cities and readjust the administrative divisions. To establish the reform goal of administrative division with the characteristics of "provincial administration of the county metropolitan area". With regard to the development of provinces directly in charge of counties, it is necessary to increase support for them, including increasing the quality and efficiency of county economies, encouraging masses to innovate, supporting the construction of new types of urbanization, supporting the protection of such elements as land indicators, and the system reform of provinces directly in charge of counties, and so on. It is also necessary to improve the comprehensive supporting measures, including encouraging and supporting vertical management departments to support the reform of the system of provinces and counties directly in charge of the county, improving the reform of the system and unblocking the selection and appointment of cadres, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D630

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡立輝;;科學(xué)推進省直管縣體制改革[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)營管理;2009年03期

2 劉傳賀;;省直管縣體制改革原則探究[J];中共樂山市委黨校學(xué)報;2010年01期

3 劉傳賀;;省直管縣體制改革困境探究[J];西安社會科學(xué);2010年02期

4 孫卓睿;;淺析我國省直管縣體制改革[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2011年10期

5 李東民;楊賀新;;推進省直管縣體制改革試點的實踐與思考[J];中國機構(gòu)改革與管理;2012年03期

6 李東民;楊賀新;;推進省直管縣體制改革試點的實踐與思考[J];機構(gòu)與行政;2012年07期

7 龐明禮;張東方;;省直管縣體制改革的制度設(shè)計研究[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年01期

8 王克群;;省直管縣體制改革建議[J];小城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè);2006年02期

9 薄貴利;;穩(wěn)步推進省直管縣體制[J];中國行政管理;2006年09期

10 徐元明;劉遠;周春芳;;省直管縣體制改革相關(guān)問題研究——以江蘇省為例[J];江海學(xué)刊;2007年06期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 ;湖南省省直管縣體制改革的建議方案[A];湖南省發(fā)展縣域特色經(jīng)濟研討會論文集[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 張建新;全省深化省直管縣體制改革工作電視電話會議召開[N];河南日報;2013年

2 張鋒 本報記者 許定華;威寧：吹響省直管縣體制改革試點“結(jié)集號”[N];畢節(jié)日報;2013年

3 詹承豫 中國政法大學(xué)政治與公共管理學(xué)院副教授;以效果為導(dǎo)向，，讓省直管縣體制改革更有意義[N];中國社會報;2009年

4 記者 王利英;全省深化省直管縣體制改革工作電視電話會議召開[N];鶴壁日報;2013年

5 馬純紅 張治忠 湖南省社會科學(xué)院副研究員、中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué)講師;推行省直管縣改革要注意風(fēng)險規(guī)避[N];中國改革報;2009年

6 河南省社會科學(xué)院 孟白;我國省直管縣改革試點中出現(xiàn)的問題及對策研究[N];農(nóng)民日報;2013年

7 記者 張建新;明年起，省直管縣實行全面直管[N];河南日報;2013年

8 記者 王仲斌;河南進一步推進省直管縣試點工作[N];中國縣域經(jīng)濟報;2011年

9 早報記者 吳志剛;江蘇“省直管縣”10月起試點[N];東方早報;2012年

10 記者 劉軍 通訊員 鄭應(yīng)平;地級中心城市功能不削弱不變異[N];湘潭日報;2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張鼎良;我國省直管縣體制改革研究[D];南京大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 劉圣輝;當(dāng)代中國省直管縣體制改革研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年

2 陳遠;論省直管縣體制改革的現(xiàn)狀、問題與對策[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

3 孫振山;省直管縣體制改革問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

4 雷皓樺;市縣行政區(qū)劃改革路徑分析[D];南昌大學(xué);2015年

5 周云;省直管縣體制中的市縣關(guān)系研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2015年

6 孫繼忠;貴州省直管縣體制改革研究[D];貴州財經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

7 蔣維林;河南省省直管縣體制改革問題與對策研究[D];河南大學(xué);2015年

8 楊佳;省直管縣體制下縣級政府的監(jiān)督與問責(zé)機制研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2015年

9 張劍;省直管縣體制改革背景下市縣關(guān)系研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2015年

10 王慈;河北省省直管縣體制改革問題研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2016年

本文編號：1994445