“替罪羊”之文化內(nèi)涵演變考釋——以《金枝》為中心
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-14 10:35
本文選題:替罪羊 + “阿薩瀉勒”; 參考:《世界民族》2017年04期
【摘要】:"替罪羊"一詞最早由16世紀(jì)的廷代爾所創(chuàng)造,但其文化內(nèi)涵與外延的擴(kuò)大卻主要源于弗雷澤的《金枝》,并且與《金枝》中始終隱含著的一條以諷喻基督教為目的的潛在線索密不可分。出于對(duì)內(nèi)米祭司繼任習(xí)俗進(jìn)行解釋——實(shí)際上是揭示宗教本質(zhì)——的需要,弗雷澤在《金枝》中通過對(duì)古希臘羅馬宗教、猶太教、基督教、現(xiàn)代"野蠻"人的替罪習(xí)俗進(jìn)行并置和分析,在歐洲古典時(shí)代、現(xiàn)代文明歐洲和當(dāng)代"野蠻"社會(huì)之間構(gòu)建了一種有關(guān)"替罪羊"問題的普遍性關(guān)系,由此提出的殺死"替罪羊國(guó)王"之說,在解釋了內(nèi)米習(xí)俗的同時(shí)也隱含了其對(duì)耶穌之死具有"殺王"儀式特質(zhì)的影射,以期達(dá)到瓦解宗教(特別是基督教)基礎(chǔ)的隱秘目的。弗雷澤的并置難免有隨意和牽強(qiáng)之嫌,但其并置本身的機(jī)巧和意圖的隱晦卻賦予了《金枝》某種諷喻性特點(diǎn),"替罪羊"問題的內(nèi)涵也由于《金枝》這種諷喻性及其文本影響力而得到了極大擴(kuò)展。
[Abstract]:The term "scapegoat" was first coined by Tyndale in the 16th century. However, its cultural connotation and extension are mainly derived from Fraser's "Golden Branch", and it is inseparable from a potential clue of allegorical Christianity, which is always implied in "Golden Branch". Out of the need to explain the tradition of succession of the Nemi priests-in fact, to reveal the nature of religion-Fraser in the Golden Branch, through the ancient Greek and Roman religions, Judaism, Christianity, The modern "barbaric" man's custom of scapegoat is juxtaposed and analyzed. In the classical European era, the modern civilization of Europe and the contemporary "barbaric" society have established a universal relationship concerning the problem of scapegoat. Therefore, the theory of killing the King of scapegoats not only explains the custom of Nemi, but also implicates its implication of the ritual characteristic of "killing kings" in the death of Jesus, in order to achieve the secret purpose of disintegrating the basis of religion (especially Christianity). Fraser's juxtaposition inevitably seems arbitrary and far-fetched. However, the juxtaposition of its cleverness and the obscurity of its intention endows the "Golden Branch" with some allegorical features, and the connotation of the "scapegoat" problem is greatly expanded by the allegory of "Golden Branch" and its textual influence.
【作者單位】: 湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)外國(guó)語學(xué)院;
【基金】:湖南省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“劍橋儀式學(xué)派興起的學(xué)術(shù)史研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):15YBA126)的階段性研究成果之一 湖南省教育廳科學(xué)研究重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“神話研究之人類學(xué)方法學(xué)術(shù)史考察(1865—1914年)”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):15A054) 湖南省社會(huì)科學(xué)界聯(lián)合會(huì)基金項(xiàng)目“弗雷澤在中國(guó)的接受與影響研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào):WX138)的支持
【分類號(hào)】:C912.4
,
本文編號(hào):1887520
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/1887520.html
最近更新
教材專著