本文選題：南洋華僑 + 民族民主革命��； 參考：《華僑華人歷史研究》2016年01期

【摘要】：論文梳理了《南洋總匯新報》和《中興日報》的創(chuàng)刊背景、雙方論戰(zhàn)的內(nèi)容、雙方論戰(zhàn)的特點,在此基礎(chǔ)上,對論戰(zhàn)結(jié)局提出了一些新的思考和看法。論文認(rèn)為發(fā)生在新加坡的《南洋總匯新報》和《中興日報》的論戰(zhàn),雖然是《新民叢報》與《民報》論戰(zhàn)的延續(xù),但是也因地點、受眾人群以及現(xiàn)實情況的改變而具有區(qū)域特點。這場論戰(zhàn)的結(jié)局也不是以往傳統(tǒng)觀點所認(rèn)為的革命派取得大勝,實際上沒有勝負(fù)可言,雙方都通過宣傳自己的政治主張獲得一批支持者,促進(jìn)了民主思想的傳播和華僑的思想解放。同時這場革命派與立憲派的論戰(zhàn)既增強了華僑的愛國主義精神,也在華僑政治傾向轉(zhuǎn)變的過程中起到了推波助瀾的作用。
[Abstract]:The paper combs the background of the founding of Nanyang General News and ZTE Daily, the contents and characteristics of the controversy between the two sides, and puts forward some new thoughts and opinions on the outcome of the debate. The paper holds that the controversy between the "Nanyang General Huixin newspaper" and the "ZTE Daily" in Singapore is a continuation of the controversy between the "Xinmin Cong newspaper" and the "people's Daily", but also because of the location. The audience and the reality of the change with regional characteristics. The outcome of this controversy was not the victory of the revolutionaries, as the traditional view used to think, but in fact there was no victory or defeat. Both sides gained a group of supporters by propagating their political views. It promoted the spread of democratic thought and the ideological liberation of overseas Chinese. At the same time, the debate between revolutionaries and constitutionalists not only strengthens the patriotic spirit of overseas Chinese, but also contributes to the change of political tendency of overseas Chinese.
【作者單位】： 新加坡國立大學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D634
，

本文編號：1856142