本文選題：善治理論 + 網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)��； 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：善治理論是為了彌補(bǔ)治理失效提出的,強(qiáng)調(diào)政府、社會(huì)、公眾協(xié)同治理,實(shí)現(xiàn)國家和社會(huì)的共管共治,保證公共利益最大化的社會(huì)管理過程,是主體多元化的“善者”治理、是實(shí)現(xiàn)公共益最大化的“善意”治理、是欲達(dá)社會(huì)最佳狀態(tài)的“善態(tài)”治理,與其他治理理論有著“天生”的優(yōu)越性。隨著人們民主化意識(shí)的提高、權(quán)利責(zé)任感的增強(qiáng),網(wǎng)絡(luò)成為公眾獲取、傳播信息、直抒觀點(diǎn)的主要渠道,人們通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)表言論表達(dá)對(duì)基本權(quán)益的維護(hù)和對(duì)公平正義的訴求。當(dāng)這些訴求得不到回應(yīng),網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論在網(wǎng)絡(luò)開放性、隱蔽性、廣泛性的作用下,極易釀成網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī),損害政府形象、威脅社會(huì)安定。對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的防范與應(yīng)對(duì)至關(guān)重要。然而,我國現(xiàn)階段國情的特殊性以及網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論自身的特殊性決定了網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)是無法用傳統(tǒng)治理模式來解決的。善治理論的興起無疑給我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的治理帶來新的契機(jī),它主張建立新的合作調(diào)節(jié)機(jī)制,合作是善治的精髓;主張建立民主制度,保障企業(yè)、公民個(gè)人、第三部門組織同政府一道成為治理的主體,并要求政府由管理者向服務(wù)者角色轉(zhuǎn)變;主張政府治理應(yīng)公開透明化,在制定政策時(shí)重點(diǎn)考慮公眾意見,向社會(huì)公眾負(fù)責(zé)。以往自上而下的權(quán)威管理,管理者管的越嚴(yán)越反彈,約束的越多越激化,很顯然,公眾需要的不再只是被管理,他們需要老有所養(yǎng),病有所醫(yī),居有定所等合理訴求的表達(dá)和落實(shí),需要主動(dòng)參與到公共事務(wù)管理,和國家或政府實(shí)現(xiàn)合作治理,共同實(shí)現(xiàn)公共資源的合理化分配,最大限度實(shí)現(xiàn)合作模式下各方利益訴求。善治理論主張合作的方式為公眾參與帶來契機(jī),是各方利益訴求得到滿足方式的有意借鑒,在一定程度上,從源頭抑制了網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的形成。在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的大背景下,政府、公民、社會(huì)三者合作共同追求公共利益的善治模式將是現(xiàn)階段中國網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)治理的最佳選擇。
[Abstract]:The theory of good governance is put forward to make up for the failure of governance. It emphasizes the cooperative governance of government, society and the public, realizes the common governance of the state and society, and ensures the social management process of maximization of public interest. It is the "good will" governance to realize the maximization of public interest and the "good state" governance to achieve the best state of the society, which has the advantage of "innate" with other governance theories. With the improvement of people's sense of democratization and the enhancement of their sense of right responsibility, the Internet has become the main channel for the public to obtain, disseminate information and express their views directly. People express their basic rights and interests through the Internet and demand for fairness and justice. When these demands are not answered, network public opinion is easy to cause network public opinion crisis, damage the image of government and threaten social stability under the function of network openness, concealment and extensiveness. It is very important to prevent and deal with the network public opinion crisis. However, the particularity of our country's current situation and the particularity of the network public opinion decide that the network public opinion crisis can not be solved by the traditional governance mode. The rise of the theory of good governance undoubtedly brings a new opportunity to the governance of our country's network public opinion crisis. It advocates the establishment of a new cooperative regulatory mechanism, which is the essence of good governance, and advocates the establishment of a democratic system to protect enterprises and individual citizens. The third sector organization, together with the government, becomes the main body of governance, and requires the government to change its role from the manager to the service provider, and advocates that government governance should be open and transparent, and the public opinion should be taken into account when formulating policies, and the government should be responsible to the public. In the past, the authority from the top to the bottom, the more strict the management, the stronger the restraint. Obviously, what the public needs is no longer just to be managed, but they need a sense of security and care for the sick. The expression and implementation of reasonable demands, such as residence, need to actively participate in the management of public affairs, cooperate with the state or government to achieve the rational allocation of public resources, and maximize the interests of all parties in the mode of cooperation. The theory of good governance advocates that the mode of cooperation brings the opportunity for the public participation, which is the intentional reference of the way of satisfying the interests of all parties. To a certain extent, it restrains the formation of the network public opinion crisis from the source. Under the background of economic globalization, the mode of good governance that the government, citizens and society cooperate to pursue the public interest together will be the best choice for the management of China's network public opinion crisis at the present stage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D63

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高旭紅;郭蕊;;善治視閾下政府治理網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的對(duì)策探析[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2013年08期

2 底高揚(yáng);;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的生成機(jī)制與應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];科技傳播;2011年04期

3 秦穎慧;秦瀟;;論政府網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的生成與應(yīng)對(duì)[J];昌吉學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

4 孫曉莉;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)公共輿論危機(jī)的應(yīng)對(duì)[J];行政管理改革;2011年01期

5 李斌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的治理范式研究[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

6 傅開強(qiáng);張戰(zhàn)勝;;全球化時(shí)代輿論危機(jī)現(xiàn)象探析[J];軍事記者;2007年07期

7 袁利民;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的分析把握與管理引導(dǎo)研究[J];思想·理論·教育;2006年21期

8 胡德平;;善治語境下中國政府再造的路徑選擇[J];行政論壇;2006年03期

9 鄧新民;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論與網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論的引導(dǎo)[J];探索;2003年05期

10 張成福;;公共危機(jī)管理:全面整合的模式與中國的戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];中國行政管理;2003年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 歐翠萍;公共網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)的發(fā)生與治理機(jī)制研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2014年

2 張文;善治視域下網(wǎng)絡(luò)政治參與分析[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2012年

3 張明鑒;善治視野下網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論危機(jī)治理的研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2011年

4 程傳超;危機(jī)管理視角的網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情監(jiān)管研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2008年

5 高瀟;網(wǎng)絡(luò)的危機(jī)傳播與管理[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1810965