本文關(guān)鍵詞： 城市治理能力 價(jià)值曲線 治理主體 提升路徑　出處：《西北大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：1990年以來(lái),隨著全球化的進(jìn)展,資本和人力在全球范圍內(nèi)的流動(dòng)不斷加速,全球城市體系建立,城市間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)也愈加激烈。在此背景下,對(duì)城市管理變革的研究主要分為兩個(gè)層面：其一,關(guān)注城市的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)以及如何構(gòu)建自身的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)；其二,關(guān)注城市內(nèi)部的權(quán)利、結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)展,探討城市政府如何轉(zhuǎn)型和定位,而城市治理正是后者一個(gè)極為重要的研究領(lǐng)域。深入剖析城市治理基礎(chǔ)理論,挖掘城市治理機(jī)制和內(nèi)涵,總結(jié)歸納城市治理結(jié)構(gòu)和模式特點(diǎn),探究城市治理新路徑,這對(duì)于提升我國(guó)城市治理能力具有十分重要的意義。本文在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)綜述和評(píng)價(jià)的基礎(chǔ)上,嘗試對(duì)城市治理能力做出定義,通過(guò)對(duì)城市治理能力體系的機(jī)理進(jìn)行深入分析,總結(jié)歸納出公平、透明度、效能、參與和法治是影響治理主體的五大因素,探討五大因素間相互影響關(guān)系,構(gòu)建城市治理能力耦合機(jī)制。在有機(jī)結(jié)合城市價(jià)值收益和城市治理能力的前提下,以及參考很多學(xué)者的相關(guān)研究,確定治理能力指標(biāo)體系的方法是層次分析法,并通過(guò)專家賦值確定每一個(gè)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,最后使用指標(biāo)體系對(duì)不同城市的治理能力進(jìn)行科學(xué)計(jì)量,得出我國(guó)19個(gè)重點(diǎn)城市治理能力的年度變化以及位序情況。而計(jì)量結(jié)果的分析主要來(lái)自三個(gè)維度：城市治理能力的縱向年度變化比較分析,借以觀測(cè)年份因素對(duì)城市間治理能力是否產(chǎn)生影響；不同重點(diǎn)城市的橫向比較分析,對(duì)我國(guó)不同行政等級(jí)城市的優(yōu)劣勢(shì)進(jìn)行分析,為后文進(jìn)一步探討不同行政等級(jí)城市的治理能力做準(zhǔn)備；對(duì)治理能力不同分項(xiàng)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行深入研究,并通過(guò)國(guó)家地圖形式進(jìn)行直觀反映分項(xiàng)指標(biāo)得分情況,考察重點(diǎn)城市在不同分項(xiàng)指標(biāo)得分的年度變化,分析產(chǎn)生這種變化的原因。本文分析不同城市治理能力變化的原因,討論影響治理主體價(jià)值收益大小的主要因素,以及不同影響因素之間可能存在的耦合機(jī)制,借此得出不同城市治理主體、不同等級(jí)城市提升城市治理能力的建議。本文認(rèn)為,城市政府注重公平和透明度,企業(yè)關(guān)注效能,居民注重法治,NGO團(tuán)體更多參與治理事務(wù)能更有效的提升城市治理能力。而不同行政等級(jí)城市的治理能力提升路徑也不同：直轄市靠“疏”,疏通各項(xiàng)資源,提高資源的利用效率,更多的注重公平；計(jì)劃單列市靠“爭(zhēng)”,繼續(xù)活躍市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì),加大外向經(jīng)濟(jì)的參與程度,綜合提高城市治理能力；其余副省級(jí)城市靠“穩(wěn)”,盡量發(fā)揮區(qū)域性中心城市功能,承接發(fā)達(dá)城市產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移,有條不紊的推進(jìn)城市治理。
[Abstract]:Since 1990, with the progress of globalization, the flow of capital and human resources has been accelerating, the global urban system has been established and the competition between cities has become increasingly fierce. The research on urban management reform is divided into two levels: one is to pay attention to the competition of the city and how to build its own competitive advantage, the other is to pay attention to the rights and the development of the structure within the city, and to discuss how the city government can transform and position itself. Urban governance is just one of the most important research fields of the latter. It deeply analyzes the basic theory of urban governance, excavates the mechanism and connotation of urban governance, summarizes and summarizes the characteristics of urban governance structure and mode, and probes into the new path of urban governance. This is of great significance for improving the ability of urban governance in China. Based on the review and evaluation of relevant literature at home and abroad, this paper tries to define the ability of urban governance. Through in-depth analysis of the mechanism of urban governance capacity system, it is concluded that fairness, transparency, efficiency, participation and rule of law are the five major factors that affect the main body of governance. Constructing the coupling mechanism of urban governance ability. Under the premise of organically combining the urban value and income with the city governance ability, and referring to the related research of many scholars, the method of determining the index system of governance ability is analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The weight of each index is determined by the expert assignment, and the scientific measurement of the governance ability of different cities is carried out by using the index system. The annual changes and order of governance capacity of 19 key cities in China are obtained, and the analysis of measurement results mainly comes from three dimensions: the comparative analysis of longitudinal annual changes of urban governance capacity, In order to observe whether the year factors have an impact on the ability of inter-city governance, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of different administrative grade cities in China, the horizontal comparative analysis of different key cities is carried out. In order to further discuss the governance ability of cities of different administrative levels, the paper makes a deep study on the different sub-indexes of governance ability, and directly reflects the score of sub-indexes through the form of national map. This paper analyzes the reasons of the change of the governance ability of different cities, and discusses the main factors that affect the value and income of the main body of governance. As well as the possible coupling mechanism among different influencing factors, this paper draws some suggestions on how to improve the ability of urban governance by different urban governance bodies and different levels of cities. This paper holds that city governments pay attention to fairness and transparency, and enterprises pay attention to efficiency. Residents pay more attention to the rule of law and NGO groups can more effectively enhance the ability of urban governance. And different administrative levels of the city governance ability enhancement path is also different: municipalities rely on "sparse", dredge all kinds of resources, improve the efficiency of resource use, More attention should be paid to fairness; cities with separate plans should rely on "contention", continue to enliven the market economy, increase the degree of participation in the outward economy, and comprehensively improve the ability of urban governance; and the remaining sub-provincial cities should rely on "stability" and try their best to give play to the functions of regional central cities. Undertake the industrial transfer of developed cities, methodically promote urban governance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F299.2;D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金南順;關(guān)于城市治理的理論與實(shí)踐[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2002年06期

2 陶希東;;公私合作伙伴:城市治理的新模式[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2005年05期

3 羅震東;;秩序、城市治理與大都市規(guī)劃理論的發(fā)展[J];城市規(guī)劃;2007年12期

4 李剛;周加來(lái);;中國(guó)的城市貧困與治理——基于能力與權(quán)利視角的分析[J];城市問題;2009年11期

5 黃文華;;城市經(jīng)營(yíng)與城市管理和城市治理的關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2006年12期

6 徐曉林;劉勇;;數(shù)字治理對(duì)城市政府善治的影響研究[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

7 楊上廣;王春蘭;;大城市社會(huì)空間演變態(tài)勢(shì)剖析與治理反思——基于上海的調(diào)查與思考[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

8 張兆曙;;城市議題與社會(huì)復(fù)合主體的聯(lián)合治理——對(duì)杭州3種城市治理實(shí)踐的組織分析[J];管理世界;2010年02期

9 葉涯劍;張光海;;作為現(xiàn)代化手段的中國(guó)城市治理(1949-2009)——以城市社會(huì)微觀控制體系為例[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年08期

10 盛廣耀;;城市治理研究評(píng)述[J];城市問題;2012年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1525864