本文關鍵詞：行政復議與行政訴訟銜接機制探討，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

行政復議與行政訴訟銜接機制探討

行政復議與行政訴訟銜接機制探討

行政復議、行政訴訟在化解行政爭議,推動社會和諧中發(fā)揮著重要作用。在傳統(tǒng)上,一般認為我國的行政復議制度是一種行政的內部糾錯機制,據(jù)此建立了書面審理、一次復議、不停止執(zhí)行等一系列行政性的爭議解決機制�！缎姓䦶妥h法》頒布10多年來,行政復議制度顯示了5大弊端,限制了這一制度功能的發(fā)揮。關于行政復議究竟該定位于監(jiān)督還是救濟,學界看法不一。本文認為我國的行政復議應從行政機關的內部糾錯機制的定位轉變?yōu)樾姓幾h的救濟機制,明確行政復議的救濟功能,應建立相對獨立、中立的行政復議機關,引進司法化的處理爭議模式,同時保證行政復議的公正和效率。本文從英國、美國、法國、韓國四國的行政復議與行政訴訟關系淺析淺析入手,結合行政權與司法權的關系淺析淺析,探索我國應該建立的銜接模式。在目前行政爭議多發(fā)的情況下,如何做好行政復議和行政訴訟這兩種救濟方式的銜接,處理好行政爭議行政解決與司法解決的關系,共同保護公民的合法權益是法學理論研究和制度設計的重要課題。本文從理論和實踐上淺析淺析二者的性質和關系,淺析淺析二者的銜接模式,并對現(xiàn)在正在各地試點的行政復議委員會模式提出質疑。本文認為應針對我國國情,對現(xiàn)行的行政復議制度進行改造,建立我國相對中立的行政復議制度,讓的行政爭議通過行政復議途徑得到化解,讓這一制度成為化解行政爭議的主渠道。同時確立司法終局裁決制度,讓行政爭議能夠接受司法的終局審查,克服單純行政解決方式可能帶來的“官官相互”的弊端,避開行政爭議解決的“體制內循環(huán)”,保障行政爭議的最終司法處理。應當做好行政復議與行政訴訟技術層面的銜接,比如行政復議和行政訴訟的提起時間的銜接,受案范圍的銜接、行政復議結果的效力不足等。通過一系列制度的設置,建立我國的行政爭議解決模式,讓行政爭議能夠按照正常的鏈條得到解決,避開因為行政爭議引發(fā)社會動蕩。

【Abstract】 Administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation in resolving administrative disputes and promote social harmony plays an important role. Traditionally, the general view that the administrative review of an administrative system is an internal error correction mechanism whereby the establishment of a written hearing, a review, do not stop the implementation of a series of administrative dispute resolution mechanism. "Administrative Reconsideration Law" promulgated 10 years, the administrative review system shows the 5 major drawbacks limit the functionality of the system to play. What about the administrative review with the Authority or the positioning of relief, academics are divided. This paper argues that the administrative reconsideration of the executive from the positioning of the internal error correction mechanisms into relief the administrative dispute mechanism, a clear function of the administrative review of relief, should establish independent, neutral agency administrative review, the introduction of judicial disputes of the treatment model while ensuring fairness and efficiency of the administrative review.This article from the UK, U.S., France, South Korea four countries between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation analysis, combining the executive power and judicial power relationship analysis, to explore the convergence of pattern should be established. Multiple administrative dispute in the present case, how to do administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation convergence of these two remedies, handle the administration to resolve administrative disputes and judicial settlement of the relations, and jointly protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and the legal theory of system design an important issue. In this paper, both theory and practice of the nature and relations of both the convergence model, and the pilot is now all over the Administrative Review Committee to be questioned.This paper argues that China’s national conditions should be targeted on the current administrative review system reform, the establishment of the relative neutrality of the administrative review system, while establishing the final award of the administrative judge of judicial system, so that more channels of administrative disputes be resolved through administrative review, Let this system has become the main channel to resolve administrative disputes.At the same time a final decision to establish justice system so that the administrative dispute to accept the final judicial review of administrative solutions to overcome the pure potential "between government officials," the defects, to avoid the administrative dispute resolution "system within the cycle," the ultimate protection of administrative disputes judicial treatment. Shall do the administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, the interface between the technical level, such as administrative reconsideration and administrative proceedings instituted time convergence, case range of convergence, the validity of the results of administrative review problems. Through a series of system settings, the establishment of China’s administrative dispute resolution model, so that the administrative dispute can be resolved in accordance with the normal chain, avoid the administrative dispute lead to social unrest.

【關鍵詞】 行政爭議； 行政復議； 行政訴訟； 制度銜接；
【Key words】 administrative disputes； administrative reconsideration； administrative litigation； reconsideration litigation； convergence of systems；

更多論文推薦: 各專業(yè)論文 海量論文下載

上一篇文章： 保安服務行業(yè)管理法治化探討

下一篇文章： 金陵女子大學和北京女子高等師范學校比較探討

  本文關鍵詞：行政復議與行政訴訟銜接機制探討，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

，

本文編號：119112