本文選題：電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商 + 服務(wù)提供商��； 參考：《北京郵電大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：隨著移動(dòng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時(shí)代的到來(lái)和電信消費(fèi)者對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)業(yè)務(wù)認(rèn)知和需求的不斷提升,電信產(chǎn)業(yè)正經(jīng)歷著深刻的變革,其中一個(gè)突出的特點(diǎn)就是由服務(wù)提供商、內(nèi)容提供商和應(yīng)用提供商組成的服務(wù)提供行業(yè)在電信產(chǎn)業(yè)中的比重不斷提升,重要性逐漸突顯。但與此同時(shí),也有一些問(wèn)題和困擾一直伴隨著服務(wù)提供行業(yè)的快速發(fā)展且變得越來(lái)越突出,其中最為典型的就是電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商和服務(wù)提供商之間的上下游縱向關(guān)系問(wèn)題。一些研究和實(shí)證顯示,運(yùn)營(yíng)商和服務(wù)提供商之間的縱向關(guān)系復(fù)雜而獨(dú)特,并且對(duì)于兩個(gè)行業(yè)甚至整個(gè)電信產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展都具有重大的影響。 但是,通過(guò)對(duì)縱向關(guān)系理論和電信產(chǎn)業(yè)的分析,本論文認(rèn)為以往研究在探討電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商和服務(wù)提供商縱向關(guān)系上,還存在一些不足和有待改進(jìn)之處,主要是：以往縱向關(guān)系研究主要在既定的結(jié)構(gòu)下進(jìn)行探討,缺乏對(duì)縱向關(guān)系形成機(jī)制的探討和數(shù)據(jù)驗(yàn)證；以往電信產(chǎn)業(yè)研究重點(diǎn)集中于單個(gè)行業(yè)的探討,缺乏將上下游行業(yè)聯(lián)系起來(lái)并針對(duì)縱向關(guān)系的研究；缺乏運(yùn)營(yíng)商與服務(wù)提供商縱向關(guān)系具體實(shí)現(xiàn)形式的針對(duì)性探討和分析。 為了彌補(bǔ)以上不足,本論文設(shè)計(jì)了三個(gè)逐步深入的研究?jī)?nèi)容,以產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈縱向關(guān)系理論為主要理論基礎(chǔ),同時(shí)結(jié)合電信產(chǎn)業(yè)的特征,分析電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商和服務(wù)提供商的上下游縱向關(guān)系,力爭(zhēng)在以下方向上進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新和突破：第一,從理論角度,分析電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商與服務(wù)提供商的縱向關(guān)系,探索形成這種機(jī)制的原因,同時(shí)應(yīng)用實(shí)證數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證；第二,從理論角度,圍繞電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商與服務(wù)提供商縱向關(guān)系,提出并建立包含上下游市場(chǎng)控制力、行業(yè)發(fā)展力等諸因素的控制力研究模型,并通過(guò)實(shí)證研究的方式進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證,探索因素間的相互關(guān)系；第三,結(jié)合電信產(chǎn)業(yè)特征,歸納總結(jié)出具體的縱向關(guān)系實(shí)現(xiàn)形式,并通過(guò)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)模型進(jìn)行分析,探討具體實(shí)現(xiàn)形式對(duì)于上下游行業(yè)利潤(rùn)的影響,以及縱向關(guān)系條件下行業(yè)利潤(rùn)與市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)的關(guān)系。 通過(guò)研究,論文最終得到了以下結(jié)論： (1)電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商和服務(wù)提供商之間的上下游縱向關(guān)系為前者對(duì)于后者的正向控制,形成這一縱向關(guān)系的主要原因是電信運(yùn)營(yíng)與服務(wù)提供兩個(gè)行業(yè)在市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)及控制力上的差異,相比于服務(wù)提供市場(chǎng)的壟斷競(jìng)爭(zhēng)結(jié)構(gòu),電信運(yùn)營(yíng)市場(chǎng)的寡頭壟斷結(jié)構(gòu)具有更強(qiáng)的壟斷性,電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商具有更強(qiáng)行業(yè)控制力和行動(dòng)置信性。論文從經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論、縱向控制力指數(shù)、正向控制主要實(shí)現(xiàn)形式、以及電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商和服務(wù)提供商效率等諸角度的分析均支持了這一結(jié)論。 (2)提出并建立以正向控制力為核心,涵蓋上下游行業(yè)市場(chǎng)控制力、發(fā)展力和產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展力的完整“電信產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈正向控制力模型”并進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究。最終證實(shí)運(yùn)營(yíng)商對(duì)服務(wù)提供商的正向控制力,分別受到電信運(yùn)營(yíng)市場(chǎng)控制力和服務(wù)提供市場(chǎng)控制力的正向和負(fù)向影響；運(yùn)營(yíng)商對(duì)服務(wù)提供商的正向控制對(duì)于上游電信運(yùn)營(yíng)行業(yè)的發(fā)展具有促進(jìn)作用,對(duì)于下游服務(wù)提供行業(yè)發(fā)展具有負(fù)向影響；從電信產(chǎn)業(yè)角度,這種正向控制不利于產(chǎn)業(yè)整體的發(fā)展和進(jìn)步。 (3)電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商對(duì)服務(wù)提供商的正向控制,主要有四種實(shí)現(xiàn)形式(縱向一體化、轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格控制、獨(dú)占交易、等級(jí)歧視)。其中,電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商通過(guò)控制最終產(chǎn)品收費(fèi)權(quán)和結(jié)算權(quán),進(jìn)行價(jià)格范圍界定實(shí)現(xiàn)轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格控制,以及對(duì)于服務(wù)提供商進(jìn)行等級(jí)劃分進(jìn)行分成比例和服務(wù)支持層面歧視性管理,是電信產(chǎn)業(yè)中比較代表性的形式。通過(guò)建立針對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格控制、獨(dú)占交易與等級(jí)歧視的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)模型并進(jìn)行分析,證實(shí)了電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商實(shí)施正向控制,促進(jìn)了電信運(yùn)營(yíng)行業(yè)利潤(rùn)的提升易造成服務(wù)提供行業(yè)利潤(rùn)的損失。此外,模型證實(shí)電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商正向控制的實(shí)施效果與電信服務(wù)提供市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)有關(guān),隨著下游服務(wù)提供商數(shù)量的增多,電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商正向控制越容易,且實(shí)施后獲得的利潤(rùn)也更多。
[Abstract]:With the advent of the era of mobile Internet and the increasing awareness and demand of Telecom consumers for data services, the telecommunications industry is undergoing profound changes. One of the prominent features is the increasing proportion of service providers, content providers and application providers, in the telecommunications industry. But at the same time, there are some problems and problems that have been accompanied by the rapid development of service supply industry and become more and more prominent, the most typical of which is the upstream and downstream relationship between telecom operators and service providers. Some research and empirical evidence shows the vertical between operators and service providers. The relationship is complex and unique, and has a significant impact on the development of the two industries and even the entire telecommunications industry.
However, through the analysis of the vertical relationship theory and the telecommunications industry, this paper holds that the previous research has some shortcomings and needs to be improved in the study of the vertical relationship between telecom operators and service providers, mainly: the previous longitudinal relationship is mainly discussed under the established structure and lack of the formation mechanism of the vertical relationship. Research and data validation; in the past, the telecommunications industry research focused on the discussion of a single industry, the lack of links between the upstream and downstream industries and the study of the vertical relationship, and the lack of specific exploration and analysis of the concrete realization forms of the vertical relationship between the operators and the service providers.
In order to make up the above deficiencies, this paper has designed three in-depth research contents, taking the industrial chain vertical relationship theory as the main theoretical basis, and combining the characteristics of the telecommunications industry, analyzing the upstream and downstream vertical relations of telecom operators and service providers, and striving to make innovations and breakthroughs in the lower direction. First, from the theoretical point of view, This paper analyzes the longitudinal relationship between telecom operators and service providers, explores the reasons for the formation of this mechanism, and uses empirical data to verify it. Second, from the theoretical point of view, the control force research model, which includes the control force of the upstream and downstream markets and the development power of the industry, is put forward and established around the longitudinal relationship between the telecom operators and the service providers. Type, and through the empirical research way to verify, explore the relationship between factors; third, combined with the characteristics of the telecommunications industry, summed up the concrete form of vertical relationship, and through the economic model to analyze the impact of specific forms on the profits of the upstream and downstream industries, and the industry profits under the conditions of vertical relations. The relationship with the market structure.
Through the research, the thesis finally gets the following conclusions:
(1) the vertical relationship between the upper and lower reaches of the telecom operators and service providers is the positive control of the former to the latter. The main reason for the formation of this vertical relationship is the difference in the market structure and control of the two industries provided by the telecom operation and service, compared to the monopolistic competition structure providing the market for the service and the oligarch of the telecom operation market. This conclusion is supported by the analysis of the economic theory, the vertical control force index, the main realization form of positive control, and the efficiency of the telecom operators and service providers.
(2) to put forward and establish a complete "positive control model" of the telecommunications industry chain, which includes the control power of the upstream and downstream industries, the development power and the industrial development power, and carries out an empirical study. Finally, the positive control of the operators to service providers is confirmed, and the division of the telecom operation market control and service provides the city. The positive and negative impact of field control; the positive control of the service provider to the service provider has a promoting effect on the development of the upstream telecom operation industry, and has a negative impact on the development of the downstream service industry, and this positive control is not conducive to the development and progress of the industry as a whole from the perspective of the telecommunications industry.
(3) there are four main forms (vertical integration, resale price control, exclusive transaction, hierarchical discrimination) in the positive control of service providers. Among them, the telecom operators can control the price range by controlling the fee and settlement rights of the final products, and carry out the resale price control, as well as the grade of service providers. The discriminatory management of dividing into proportion and service support is the most representative form in the telecommunication industry. Through the establishment of the economic model of the resale price control, the exclusive transaction and the hierarchical discrimination, the author confirms the positive control of the telecom operators, which promotes the improvement of the profit of the telecom operation industry. In addition, the model confirms that the implementation effect of the telecom operators' forward control is related to the market structure of telecommunication services. With the increase of the number of downstream service providers, the more easy the telecom operators are to control, and more profits are obtained after the implementation of the telecom operators.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F626

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣國(guó)俊,蔣明新;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈理論及其穩(wěn)定機(jī)制研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

2 徐楊;管錫展;;企業(yè)獨(dú)占交易策略的基本理論及其反壟斷政策意義[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2006年04期

3 侯強(qiáng);;獨(dú)占交易的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析與反壟斷政策[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年01期

4 駱品亮;王婷;;基于FMC的3G背景下電信產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈整合模式與業(yè)務(wù)融合策略[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年05期

5 潘成云;解讀產(chǎn)業(yè)價(jià)值鏈——兼析我國(guó)新興產(chǎn)業(yè)價(jià)值鏈基本特征[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2001年09期

6 李劍;唐斐;;轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格維持中的經(jīng)銷商服務(wù)理論:解釋力與不足[J];東方法學(xué);2008年06期

7 李心芹,李仕明,蘭永;產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈結(jié)構(gòu)類型研究[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2004年04期

8 唐守廉,張靜,鄭麗;電信競(jìng)爭(zhēng)三部曲[J];電信科學(xué);2003年01期

9 陳山枝;電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商業(yè)模式變化的探討[J];電信科學(xué);2004年07期

10 董濤;;專利權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配力問(wèn)題研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 南京郵電學(xué)院 王林林 王良元;[N];通信信息報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 沈劍;我國(guó)三網(wǎng)融合上下游產(chǎn)業(yè)有效競(jìng)爭(zhēng)關(guān)系研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2011年

2 鄭杰;我國(guó)電信運(yùn)營(yíng)業(yè)主壟斷競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與管制研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

3 范云翠;電信產(chǎn)業(yè)價(jià)值鏈主體的合作競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

4 唐斐;轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格維持的反壟斷法規(guī)制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

5 王艷;基于生態(tài)學(xué)的運(yùn)營(yíng)商移動(dòng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)商業(yè)模式研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2008年

6 李建平;移動(dòng)數(shù)據(jù)增值業(yè)務(wù)平臺(tái)縱向關(guān)系問(wèn)題研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2008年

7 宋明;電信業(yè)的渠道沖突與控制研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 郝逢清;論中國(guó)電信服務(wù)企業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

2 裴冬艷;論反壟斷法中的轉(zhuǎn)售價(jià)格維持[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年

3 彭鎮(zhèn)坤;價(jià)格歧視的法律經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

4 王秀新;中國(guó)移動(dòng)通信行業(yè)增值服務(wù)發(fā)展模式研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2005年

5 王興歷;中國(guó)移動(dòng)增值業(yè)務(wù)市場(chǎng)研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

6 胡錦鋒;國(guó)內(nèi)電信增值服務(wù)產(chǎn)業(yè)分析[D];清華大學(xué);2005年

7 程先鋒;電信資費(fèi)模式和水平研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2006年

8 劉旭峰;電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商轉(zhuǎn)型模式對(duì)增值業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)展影響研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2007年

9 張玉華;我國(guó)提供電信增值服務(wù)的上市公司之比較研究：財(cái)務(wù)視角[D];清華大學(xué);2007年

10 劉薇;運(yùn)營(yíng)商占主導(dǎo)的移動(dòng)增值業(yè)務(wù)供應(yīng)鏈利潤(rùn)分配研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1872401