本文選題：國(guó)不與民爭(zhēng)利　切入點(diǎn)：朝野博弈鑒戒和反思　出處：《財(cái)政監(jiān)督》2016年22期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】："國(guó)不與民爭(zhēng)利"是我國(guó)古代以儒家為代表的社會(huì)群體的一種重要經(jīng)濟(jì)思想。他們看到了國(guó)君和一些"聚斂之臣"通過(guò)畸重的稅收以及直接操辦或壟斷工商經(jīng)營(yíng),對(duì)國(guó)民的超經(jīng)濟(jì)剝奪。從春秋以至清末,朝野儒家代表人物通過(guò)規(guī)勸、批評(píng)、立論等方式論述了其危害,雖然構(gòu)成了對(duì)無(wú)魘的君主和斂臣的倫理制衡,但終究不能制止君主最大限度獲取財(cái)政收入的沖動(dòng)。"國(guó)不與民爭(zhēng)利"至今仍有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,它觸及了制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的基本問(wèn)題:國(guó)家/政府的職責(zé)和邊界,需要今人繼續(xù)深入研究。
[Abstract]:"the country does not compete with the people for profit" is an important economic thought of the social group represented by Confucianism in ancient China. They saw that the monarch and some "convergent officials" operated or monopolized industrial and commercial operations through extremely heavy taxation and direct operation or monopoly of business. From the Spring and Autumn period to the end of the Qing Dynasty, the representatives of the ruling and opposition Confucianists discussed its harm through persuasion, criticism and argument, although it constituted an ethical check and balance on the monarchs and ministers who did not have nightmares. However, it can not stop the monarch's impulse to obtain the maximum financial income. "country does not compete with the people for profit" still has practical significance, it touches on the basic problem of institutional economics: the duties and boundaries of the state / government need to be further studied by the present people.
【作者單位】： 《陜西國(guó)稅》雜志社;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F812.9
，

本文編號(hào)：1640732