本文關鍵詞： 財政分權 市場分割 相對價格法 面板回歸　出處：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：市場分割是中國經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型過程中出現(xiàn)的一種特殊現(xiàn)象，隨著市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和我國經(jīng)濟體制改革的不斷深入，，市場分割呈現(xiàn)出一些新的特點：市場分割的范圍從傳統(tǒng)的產(chǎn)品市場向勞動力市場、資本市場蔓延，市場分割的隱蔽性越來越強，影響市場一體化的因素越來越復雜。零碎的國內(nèi)市場嚴重阻礙了我國經(jīng)濟健康穩(wěn)定的發(fā)展，降低了抵御經(jīng)濟危機的能力，同時也削弱了“中國制造”在國際市場上的競爭力。在當前經(jīng)濟全球化的國際背景和調(diào)整經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式、優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的國內(nèi)環(huán)境下，打破地方保護，整合國內(nèi)市場，提高資源配置效率，加快市場一體化進程，形成合理的地區(qū)分工格局，促進區(qū)域經(jīng)濟的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展，對保持國民經(jīng)濟健康、持續(xù)發(fā)展具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 二元制經(jīng)濟體制讓市場分割在我國呈現(xiàn)了一定的特殊性，其中一個重要的表現(xiàn)就是三個主要的市場：產(chǎn)品市場、資本市場、勞動力市場分割的共存。面對三大市場分割同時存在的復雜局面，我們認為有必要對區(qū)域市場分割問題進行全新的、多角度的、深入的研究，是什么造成了三大市場分割，不同地區(qū)、不同市場分割有何差異，怎樣從源頭上避免這種負面影響？這都是急需探討的問題。 市場分割是地方政府運用手中的行政權力，從地方本位出發(fā)，運用行政手段圍繞經(jīng)濟資源的爭奪而展開的不正當競爭行為，這種現(xiàn)象的產(chǎn)生和我國特殊的財政體制安排密切相關，尤其是與我國財政分權體制緊密聯(lián)系的。因此，有必要著重從財政分權角度對市場分割進行分析，以找到解決問題的根本。 盡管現(xiàn)有文獻關于財政分權對市場分割的影響在理論上已有大量研究，但對這一影響的實證檢驗仍然是學術熱點，本文基于“冰川模型”利用相對價格法測量了全國378個省際對三大市場的分割程度，利用2001-2011年中國分省面板數(shù)據(jù)檢驗了我國財政分權度（包括支出分權度、收入分權度）、市場化指數(shù)、外商直接投資、外貿(mào)依存度、調(diào)整距離對市場分割度的影響，利用不同的財政分權指標分階段、分市場、分區(qū)域著重分析財政分權度對區(qū)域市場分割的影響。結(jié)果顯示，財政支出分權對市場分割具有明顯的正向效應，相比之下，收入分權的作用不夠顯著；2008年金融危機之后，財政支出分權對市場分割的影響力度有小幅的增強，且都十分顯著，收入分權的影響有所減弱；從細分市場來看，財政支出分權的效果都非常顯著，收入分權則只對勞動力市場分割效果顯著；從區(qū)位上分析，在東部地區(qū)，支出分權和收入分權的提高都會顯著增強市場分割程度，而在中部地區(qū)都不顯著，支出分權對西部地區(qū)市場分割有顯著正向效應。
[Abstract]:Market segmentation is a special phenomenon in the process of China's economic transformation. With the development of market economy and the deepening of China's economic system reform. Market segmentation presents some new features: the scope of market segmentation from the traditional product market to the labor market, the capital market spread, the market segmentation is more and more hidden. The factors affecting market integration are becoming more and more complex. The fragmented domestic market seriously hinders the healthy and stable development of our economy and reduces the ability to resist the economic crisis. At the same time, it also weakens the competitiveness of "made in China" in the international market. In the current international background of economic globalization and adjustment of economic development mode, optimize the industrial structure of the domestic environment, break the local protection. Integrating the domestic market, improving the efficiency of resource allocation, speeding up the process of market integration, forming a reasonable regional division of labor pattern, promoting the coordinated development of regional economy, to maintain the health of the national economy. Sustainable development has important practical significance. The dualistic economic system makes the market segmentation in our country present certain particularity, one of the important performance is the three main markets: product market, capital market. The coexistence of labor market segmentation. Facing the complex situation of the three major market segmentation, we think it is necessary to carry out a new, multi-angle, in-depth research on the regional market segmentation. What caused the three major market segmentation, different regions, different market segmentation differences, how to avoid the source of this negative impact? These are all issues that need to be explored. Market segmentation is the unfair competition that the local government carries out around the competition of economic resources by using the administrative power in the hands, starting from the local standard and using administrative means. The emergence of this phenomenon is closely related to the special financial institutional arrangements in China, especially to the fiscal decentralization system in China. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on the analysis of market segmentation from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. To find the root of the problem. Although there has been a lot of research on the influence of fiscal decentralization on market segmentation in the existing literature, the empirical test of this effect is still a hot academic topic. Based on the "glacier model", the relative price method is used to measure the segmentation of the three major markets among 378 provinces in China. The paper tests the degree of fiscal decentralization (including expenditure decentralization, income decentralization, marketization index, foreign direct investment and foreign trade dependence) by using the data of China's provincial panel from 2001 to 2011. The influence of adjustment distance on market segmentation is analyzed by using different fiscal decentralization indexes in different stages, and the effect of fiscal decentralization on regional market segmentation is analyzed. Fiscal expenditure decentralization has obvious positive effect on market segmentation, but the effect of income decentralization is not obvious. After the financial crisis in 2008, the influence of fiscal expenditure decentralization on market segmentation was strengthened slightly, and the influence of income decentralization was weakened. From the perspective of market segmentation, the effect of fiscal expenditure decentralization is very significant, while income decentralization only has significant effect on labor market segmentation. From the location analysis, in the eastern region, the increase of expenditure decentralization and income decentralization will significantly enhance the degree of market segmentation, but not in the central region, expenditure decentralization has a significant positive effect on the market segmentation in the western region.
【學位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F812.2;F123.9

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 李杰,孫群燕;從啤酒市場整合程度看WTO對消除地方保護的影響[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2004年06期

2 趙奇?zhèn)?熊性美;;中國三大市場分割程度的比較分析:時間走勢與區(qū)域差異[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2009年06期

3 傅道忠;;中國財政分權制度變遷及其發(fā)展趨勢分析[J];廣東商學院學報;2006年04期

4 何智美;王敬云;;地方保護主義探源——一個政治晉升博弈模型[J];山西財經(jīng)大學學報;2007年05期

5 龔鋒;雷欣;;中國式財政分權的數(shù)量測度[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2010年10期

6 鄭毓盛,李崇高;中國地方分割的效率損失[J];中國社會科學;2003年01期

7 周業(yè)安,馮興元,趙堅毅;地方政府競爭與市場秩序的重構(gòu)[J];中國社會科學;2004年01期

本文編號：1480443