本文選題：多中心治理 + 食品安全　； 參考：《浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：食品是人類賴以生存的物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ)，它與人民群眾的身體健康及生命安全息息相關(guān)，同時(shí)也關(guān)系到國家與社會(huì)的和諧穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。中國歷來重視食品安全問題，自改革開放以來我國已經(jīng)基本實(shí)現(xiàn)了全民溫飽，食品的數(shù)量安全問題也得以緩解，但隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的飛速發(fā)展，人民群眾早已不再僅滿足于吃飽飯，他們更多地關(guān)注食品的質(zhì)量安全。然而目前我國食品安全狀況并不樂觀，食品安全事件層出不窮，從問題奶粉系列事件、可口可樂“含氯門”事件、“地溝油”事件、到后來的雙匯“瘦肉精”事件、“皮鞋酸奶果凍”事件，我國已經(jīng)進(jìn)入了危機(jī)頻發(fā)時(shí)期，各種食品安全問題不斷，發(fā)生頻率急劇加快，這些頻繁發(fā)生的食品安全事件使人民群眾的生命安全受到嚴(yán)重威脅，同時(shí)也給國家經(jīng)濟(jì)造成巨大損失，降低了政府的公信力，威脅到社會(huì)的長久穩(wěn)定及和諧社會(huì)的建設(shè)�？偨Y(jié)歷次食品安全事件的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)可以看出，食品安全危機(jī)具有突發(fā)性和極大的不確定性，頻繁發(fā)生的食品安全危機(jī)事件對(duì)我國政府的危機(jī)治理能力提出了挑戰(zhàn)。但是，從目前的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況來看，政府在緊急資源儲(chǔ)備、人員調(diào)動(dòng)、組織機(jī)制等方面存在各種局限性，無論是在食品安全危機(jī)預(yù)警、危機(jī)處理還是善后恢復(fù)階段，單純依靠政府的力量是無法快速、有效的解決危機(jī)的。因此，我們?cè)趫?jiān)持政府應(yīng)急管理主導(dǎo)地位的同時(shí)，應(yīng)強(qiáng)調(diào)應(yīng)急管理主體的多元性，有必要將非政府組織、公眾、營利組織等社會(huì)力量納入到政府應(yīng)急管理體系中，充分利用各主體的自身優(yōu)勢(shì)，發(fā)揮其在應(yīng)急管理中的積極作用，調(diào)動(dòng)一切可用的人力、物力資源，形成社會(huì)整體的危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)，實(shí)現(xiàn)食品安全應(yīng)急管理的多元參與，這是解決頻發(fā)食品安全問題的關(guān)鍵之所在。 全文從多中心治理理論出發(fā)，試圖通過研究分析來尋求完善我國食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制的有效路徑。文章共分為五個(gè)部分，第一部分：對(duì)本文的研究背景、研究意義，理論基礎(chǔ)以及國內(nèi)外食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的闡述；第二部分：對(duì)食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制的相關(guān)概念作了詳細(xì)的解讀，探討了完善食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制的意義，并對(duì)我國食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制建設(shè)的目前實(shí)踐進(jìn)展進(jìn)行了闡述。第三部分：重點(diǎn)分析了我國食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制所存在的問題及導(dǎo)致問題的深層原因，第四部分：運(yùn)用比較分析方法分析了國外的食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制，并得到國外食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制建設(shè)的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，，為完善我國多元參與機(jī)制提供有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒。第五部分：針對(duì)我國食品安全危機(jī)應(yīng)急管理多元參與機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀，從多元參與法律制度環(huán)境的優(yōu)化、多元參與社會(huì)協(xié)作機(jī)制的構(gòu)建、多元參與主體間信息溝通共享機(jī)制的完善、多元參與主體權(quán)責(zé)分配機(jī)制建設(shè)幾方面對(duì)完善我國食品安全應(yīng)急管理多元參機(jī)制提出了對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:Food is the material basis of human survival. It is closely related to the health of the people and the safety of life. At the same time, it is also related to the harmonious and stable development of the state and society. China has always attached importance to the problem of food safety. Since the reform and opening up, our country has basically realized the whole people's food and clothing, and the problem of the quantity safety of food has also been alleviated. But with the rapid development of our country's economy, the people are no longer satisfied with food and food. They pay more attention to the quality and safety of food. However, the situation of food safety in China is not optimistic, and the food safety incidents emerge in an endless stream, from the issue of the milk powder series, the Coca-Cola "chlorinated door" incident, the "gutter oil" event, to the post. The incident of "lean meat essence" of Shuanghui, "leather shoes and yogurt jelly", China has entered a period of frequent crisis, and the frequent occurrence of various food safety problems, the frequent occurrence of food safety incidents caused the people's life safety to be seriously threatened, but also caused great loss to the national economy, and reduced the loss of the national economy. The government's credibility threatens the long-term stability of the society and the construction of a harmonious society. A summary of the experience and lessons of the food safety incidents shows that the food safety crisis is of sudden and great uncertainty, and the frequent occurrence of food safety crisis has challenged the government's ability to govern the crisis. In front of the actual situation, the government has various limitations in the emergency resources reserve, personnel mobilization, organization mechanism and so on, whether it is in the food security crisis warning, crisis treatment or recovery stage, simply relying on the power of the government can not quickly, effectively solve the crisis. Therefore, we adhere to the government emergency management leading. At the same time, we should emphasize the pluralism of the main body of emergency management. It is necessary to bring the social forces of non-governmental organizations, the public and the profit organization into the government emergency management system, make full use of their own advantages, play their active role in emergency management, mobilize all available human and material resources, and form a social whole. Crisis response network, to achieve multiple participation in food safety emergency management, is the key to solve the frequent food safety problem.
Starting from the theory of multi center governance, this paper tries to find an effective way to improve the multi participation mechanism of food safety emergency management in China through research and analysis. The article is divided into five parts. The first part: the research background, research significance, theoretical foundation and the status of multiple participation in food safety emergency management at home and abroad. The second part explains in detail the related concepts of multiple participation mechanism in the emergency management of food safety, discusses the significance of improving the multi participation mechanism of food safety emergency management, and expounds the current practice progress of the construction of multiple participation mechanism of food safety emergency management in China. Third parts are also discussed. This paper focuses on the analysis of the problems in the multi participation mechanism of food safety emergency management in China and the deep reasons that lead to the problems. The fourth part is to analyze the multi participation mechanism of foreign food safety emergency management in foreign countries by comparative analysis method, and get the advanced experience of the construction of the multi participation mechanism of foreign food safety emergency management. The fifth part: in view of the present situation of multiple participation mechanism in the emergency management of food safety crisis in China, from the optimization of multiple participation in the legal system environment, the multi participation in the construction of social cooperation mechanism, the improvement of the multi participation mechanism of information communication and sharing among the participants, and the multi participation of the main body. The construction of power and responsibility distribution mechanism puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for improving the multi parameter mechanism of food safety emergency management in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F279.2;F426.82

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡代平;雷愛中;李宗明;竇慧明;;水安全與應(yīng)急管理的探討[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2007年04期

2 ;北京市人民政府辦公廳轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)國務(wù)院辦公廳關(guān)于加強(qiáng)企業(yè)應(yīng)急管理工作文件的通知[J];北京市人民政府公報(bào);2007年07期

3 ;應(yīng)急管理 防患未然[J];中國政府采購;2008年05期

4 梁賢艷;吳淑嫻;;應(yīng)急管理中的人力資源問題分析[J];管理觀察;2008年09期

5 樊聯(lián)社;;淺談金融危機(jī)與管理[J];西部金融;2008年10期

6 鄭振宇;;從應(yīng)急管理走向公共安全管理——應(yīng)急管理發(fā)展的必然趨勢(shì)[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

7 ;民政部攜手IBM科技減災(zāi)[J];每周電腦報(bào);2008年37期

8 張向暉;;航空公司航班干擾應(yīng)急管理初探[J];交通企業(yè)管理;2009年02期

9 左雄;官昌貴;;突發(fā)自然災(zāi)害應(yīng)急管理問題探討[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2009年02期

10 陳安;趙晶;張睿;;應(yīng)急管理中的可恢復(fù)性評(píng)價(jià)[J];科學(xué)對(duì)社會(huì)的影響;2009年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 官昌貴;左雄;何澤能;梅勇;楊雪梅;曾祥平;;美德日三國突發(fā)氣象災(zāi)害應(yīng)急管理經(jīng)驗(yàn)及其對(duì)我國的啟示[A];第27屆中國氣象學(xué)會(huì)年會(huì)重大天氣氣候事件與應(yīng)急氣象服務(wù)分會(huì)場論文集[C];2010年

2 黃衛(wèi)東;;基于環(huán)境感知的應(yīng)急管理知識(shí)需求研究[A];第四屆中國軟件工程大會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

3 張榮;;增強(qiáng)應(yīng)急管理意識(shí)提高應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)事件能力[A];科技創(chuàng)新與產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展（B卷）——第七屆沈陽科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨渾南高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展論壇文集[C];2010年

4 張克中;徐亞芬;萬奎;楊麗萍;;基層氣象災(zāi)害應(yīng)急管理體系探索與實(shí)踐[A];第八屆長三角氣象科技發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2011年

5 牛躍林;王釗;;淺談我國城市生產(chǎn)安全事故應(yīng)急管理[A];現(xiàn)代建設(shè)工程應(yīng)用技術(shù)學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

6 王琪;趙t

本文編號(hào)：2102928