本文選題：民營(yíng)企業(yè) + 國(guó)美電器�。� 參考：《石河子大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：國(guó)美電器，中國(guó)最大的家電零售連鎖企業(yè)，因一場(chǎng)控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)而倍受關(guān)注。爭(zhēng)斗主要圍繞創(chuàng)始人兼大股東黃光裕與職業(yè)經(jīng)理人陳曉而展開，并牽連出股東大會(huì)與董事會(huì)權(quán)力分配、大股東在公司的地位、外來(lái)資本介入、創(chuàng)始人保護(hù)、職業(yè)經(jīng)理人角色及信托責(zé)任等爭(zhēng)論。改革開放以來(lái)，我國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)得到了飛速的發(fā)展，民營(yíng)企業(yè)在發(fā)展壯大的過程中會(huì)走向吸引資本入股、擴(kuò)大股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)這條道路。隨著股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)的不斷豐富，現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度也會(huì)逐漸健全。職業(yè)經(jīng)理人、外來(lái)資本都將被引入，企業(yè)經(jīng)歷著改革轉(zhuǎn)型，創(chuàng)始人面對(duì)著控制權(quán)減弱的過程。企業(yè)發(fā)展過程中，，同時(shí)與創(chuàng)始人的利益也產(chǎn)生沖突。民營(yíng)企業(yè)的創(chuàng)始人、大股東和職業(yè)經(jīng)理人往往在控制權(quán)這個(gè)層面上發(fā)生糾紛。最近，被稱為中國(guó)商業(yè)史上極具典型案例的國(guó)美控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)，其間由國(guó)美電器創(chuàng)始人黃光裕和職業(yè)經(jīng)理人陳曉之間的“黃陳”之爭(zhēng)，非常值得分析和反思。本文采取個(gè)案分析的方法，研究的案例是國(guó)美電器（股票代碼：0493，股票名稱：GOME）。采用案例介紹——案例問題分析——案例啟示分析的結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)國(guó)美電器控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)進(jìn)行了研究，歸納得出結(jié)論。通過對(duì)國(guó)美電器控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)這一案例，分析以國(guó)美電器為代表的民營(yíng)公司在公司治理過程中出現(xiàn)的問題，從而提出相應(yīng)的改善措施，對(duì)我國(guó)眾多民營(yíng)企業(yè)的公司治理提供有效的幫助與思考。在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中，關(guān)于上市民營(yíng)企業(yè)的控制權(quán)爭(zhēng)奪的案例越來(lái)越多，這些控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)的背后，都有相似之處，本文通過對(duì)控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)的方式進(jìn)行分析，結(jié)合國(guó)美電器的實(shí)例，對(duì)控制權(quán)斗爭(zhēng)反應(yīng)的問題進(jìn)行梳理，為我國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)公司治理提供有利的補(bǔ)充和借鑒意義。國(guó)美控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)反映了中國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型過程中普遍存在的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，民營(yíng)企業(yè)的發(fā)展離不開所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的分離，離不開吸收外來(lái)資本，離不開創(chuàng)始股東分散股權(quán)等問題。民營(yíng)企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)這些轉(zhuǎn)型風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，有賴于完善其公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)，發(fā)現(xiàn)所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)分離存在的問題，真正改善并實(shí)現(xiàn)所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)相互分離、相互制約；有賴于鑒別外來(lái)資本投資目的，選取與企業(yè)長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)目標(biāo)一致的外來(lái)資本；有賴于創(chuàng)始股東適當(dāng)保護(hù)自身的權(quán)益。國(guó)美控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)引發(fā)的一系列問題，讓更多的民營(yíng)企業(yè)開始重視轉(zhuǎn)型風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，國(guó)美控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)像是一面剛被擦過的鏡子，讓鏡前的民營(yíng)企業(yè)家們猝然看清了自己及周圍的環(huán)境�？梢哉f(shuō)，國(guó)美之爭(zhēng)本身對(duì)于廣大民營(yíng)企業(yè)，特別是站在上市前后的民營(yíng)企業(yè)，思考如何設(shè)計(jì)自己的企業(yè)治理結(jié)構(gòu)，都是重要的一課。
[Abstract]:Gome, the largest retail chain in China, has attracted much attention because of a dispute over the right to control. The struggle is mainly about the founder and major shareholder Wong Kwong Yu and the professional manager Chen Xiao, and implicated in the distribution of the power of the shareholders' meeting and the board of directors, the position of the large shareholders in the company, the intervention of foreign capital, the protection of the founder and the professional manager. Since the reform and opening up, the private enterprises in China have been developing rapidly. In the process of the development and expansion of the private enterprises, the private enterprises will move towards attracting capital and expanding the ownership structure. With the continuous enrichment of the ownership structure, the modern enterprise system will gradually improve. The professional managers and foreign capital will all be developed. The enterprise experienced the reform transformation, the founder faced the process of weakening control. In the process of enterprise development, it also conflicts with the interests of the founder. The founders of the private enterprises, large shareholders and professional managers often have disputes on the level of control. Most recently, it is called a typical case in the history of Chinese business. The dispute between Gome's control power, between Wong Kwong Yu and Chen Xiao, the founder of Gome, and the "Huang Chen" between the professional manager, Chen Xiao, is very worthy of analysis and reflection. This article adopts the case analysis method, the case study is GOME Electrical Appliance (Stock Code: 0493, Stock Name: GOME). Case introduction - Case Analysis - Case The structure of the example revelation analysis has carried on the research to the contention of the control right of Gome electric appliance, and concludes the conclusion. Through the case of the contention of the control right of Gome electric appliance, this paper analyzes the problems that the private companies of Gome are represented in the process of corporate governance, and then puts forward the corresponding measures to improve the corporate governance of many private enterprises in our country. In real life, in real life, there are more and more cases of control rights for listed private enterprises, and there are similarities behind the contention of these control rights. Through the analysis of the way of the contention of control right, this article combing the examples of Gome electric appliances, combing the problems of the control right struggle reaction, for our country The corporate governance of private enterprises provides a favorable supplement and reference significance. The contention of the control right of Gome reflects the common risks in the process of the transformation of private enterprises in China. The development of private enterprises can not be separated from the separation of ownership and management right, without the absorption of foreign capital and the decentralization of the shareholders. Some transformation risks depend on the improvement of the corporate governance structure, the separation of ownership and management rights, and the real improvement and Realization of the separation and restriction of ownership and management rights, which depends on the identification of foreign capital investment purposes and the selection of foreign capital that is consistent with the long-term objectives of the enterprise; it depends on the proper protection of the original shareholders. A series of problems caused by the dispute over the control power of Gome let more and more private enterprises begin to pay attention to the risk of transformation. The contention of the control right of Gome is like a mirror that has just been erased, so that the private entrepreneurs in front of the mirror suddenly see themselves and the surrounding environment. Before and after the listing of private enterprises, thinking about how to design their own corporate governance structure is an important lesson.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：石河子大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F275;F426.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 連建輝;“管理者控制權(quán)”重探——管理者與企業(yè)剩余控制權(quán)的配置[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2004年04期

2 蒲自立,劉芍佳;論公司控制權(quán)及對(duì)公司績(jī)效的影響分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2004年10期

3 馬磊;;委托-代理危機(jī)與控制權(quán)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)——基于國(guó)美電器控制權(quán)爭(zhēng)奪的案例分析[J];東岳論叢;2010年12期

4 劉斌;;論控股股東與董事會(huì)的權(quán)利界分——以國(guó)美之爭(zhēng)為視角[J];海峽法學(xué);2011年01期

5 祝繼高;王春飛;;大股東能有效控制管理層嗎?——基于國(guó)美電器控制權(quán)爭(zhēng)奪的案例研究[J];管理世界;2012年04期

6 邵云;;傳統(tǒng)文化和商業(yè)倫理對(duì)公司治理的影響——以國(guó)美電器控制權(quán)之爭(zhēng)為例[J];淮海工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

7 孫崢嶸;試論代理成本最小化是股份公司的財(cái)務(wù)目標(biāo)[J];時(shí)代財(cái)會(huì);2001年08期

8 葉國(guó)燦;葉冠宇;;民營(yíng)企業(yè)管理職業(yè)化進(jìn)程研究[J];金華職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

9 鄭勇;高泗強(qiáng);;家族企業(yè)引入職業(yè)經(jīng)理人實(shí)現(xiàn)共贏策略探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2011年04期

10 徐林青;鄭勇;;基于國(guó)美事件的家族企業(yè)公司治理問題探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2011年09期

本文編號(hào)：2013292