本文選題：煤電之爭 + 電煤市場　； 參考：《長沙理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：2002年火力發(fā)電用煤市場化改革以后，電煤價格持續(xù)大幅度上漲，火電企業(yè)經(jīng)營困難甚至虧損，并導(dǎo)致電力供應(yīng)短缺的現(xiàn)象被形象地稱為“煤電之爭”，理順煤電價格關(guān)系也因此成為近年來政府經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的重點工作之一。 本文從分析“煤電之爭”的本質(zhì)及其對發(fā)電企業(yè)和社會的影響入手，運用微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)市場均衡理論解釋了“煤電之爭”產(chǎn)生的根本原因。研究結(jié)果表明：電煤市場失靈即電煤供求不能隨著市場均衡價格變化而調(diào)整從而形成價格穩(wěn)定機制是電煤價格持續(xù)大幅度上漲并導(dǎo)致“煤電之爭”的根本原因；“煤電之爭”表面上是煤炭和電力行業(yè)（企業(yè)）之爭，實際上卻是政府經(jīng)濟(jì)社會目標(biāo)與電價政策選擇的內(nèi)在沖突。 我國電源結(jié)構(gòu)以火電為主，考慮到火電企業(yè)經(jīng)營困難對電力供應(yīng)的消極影響，發(fā)電集團(tuán)需要系統(tǒng)地制定經(jīng)營策略來化解“煤電之爭”對其造成的虧損。由于目前政府在處理“煤電之爭”的政策上存在管制缺失，雖然先后頒布了一系列管制政策和措施，但始終無法從根本上化解煤電矛盾。因此本文將政府政策因素納入到發(fā)電集團(tuán)經(jīng)營策略制定框架中來，將其作為發(fā)電集團(tuán)經(jīng)營策略制定的一個內(nèi)生變量。發(fā)電集團(tuán)首先應(yīng)該從政府政策上入手給政府提出切實可行的政策建議。建議順序采用以下三條：首先盡可能完善電煤市場；其次對電煤市場采取必要的管制措施；仍然不能解決的燃料成本增加則需要啟動煤電價格聯(lián)動機制。在政府政策合理的前提條件下，發(fā)電集團(tuán)還需要從自身做文章，積極采取一些內(nèi)部管理經(jīng)營策略應(yīng)對“煤電之爭”，這些策略包括煤電聯(lián)營、統(tǒng)一購煤、多元化經(jīng)營以及優(yōu)化電源結(jié)構(gòu)等。這樣形成了一套完整的發(fā)電集團(tuán)化解“煤電之爭”的經(jīng)營策略體系，，不僅為我國發(fā)電集團(tuán)從根本上扭轉(zhuǎn)火電業(yè)務(wù)虧損提出了新的途徑，同時也為解決“電荒”，保證電力工業(yè)安全供應(yīng)提供了新的解決思路。
[Abstract]:After the market-oriented reform of coal for thermal power generation in 2002, the price of thermal coal continued to rise by a large margin, and the operation difficulties and even losses of thermal power enterprises, which led to the shortage of electricity supply, were vividly referred to as "the contention of coal and electricity".Therefore, straightening out the price relationship of coal and electricity has become one of the key tasks in the reform of government economic system in recent years.Based on the analysis of the essence of "the contention of coal and electricity" and its influence on the power generation enterprises and society, this paper explains the root cause of "the contention of coal and electricity" by using the market equilibrium theory of microeconomics.The results show that the failure of power coal market, that is, the supply and demand of power coal can not be adjusted with the change of market equilibrium price, thus forming the price stability mechanism is the fundamental reason for the price of thermal coal to continue to rise by a large margin and lead to the "coal power competition".On the surface, "the contention of coal and electricity" is the conflict between coal and power industry (enterprise), but in fact, it is the internal conflict between the economic and social goal of government and the policy choice of electricity price.The power supply structure of our country is dominated by thermal power. Considering the negative influence of power supply caused by the difficulties of thermal power enterprises, power generation groups need to formulate management strategies systematically to resolve the losses caused by "the contention of coal and electricity".Because of the lack of control in the policy of dealing with the "dispute over coal power", the government has promulgated a series of control policies and measures, but it has never been able to fundamentally resolve the contradiction between coal and electricity.Therefore, this paper takes the government policy factor into the framework of power generation group management strategy formulation, and regards it as an endogenous variable of generation group business strategy formulation.The power generation group should first put forward practical policy suggestions to the government from the government policy.It is suggested that the order should be as follows: first, to perfect the power coal market as far as possible; secondly, to take necessary control measures to the thermal coal market; the increase of fuel cost which can not be solved needs to start the coal-electricity price linkage mechanism.Under the premise of reasonable government policy, the power generation group also needs to actively adopt some internal management and management strategies to deal with the "coal and electricity disputes" from its own perspective. These strategies include coal and power joint ventures and unified coal purchase.Diversification and optimization of power supply structure.This has formed a complete business strategy system for power generation groups to resolve the "dispute over coal and electricity", which not only provides a new way for our power generation groups to fundamentally reverse the losses of thermal power business, but also solves the "electricity shortage".It provides a new solution to ensure the safe supply of electric power industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長沙理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F274;F426.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曲創(chuàng);秦陽洋;;中國煤電談判勢力的來源與比較[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2009年10期

2 劉博;曾勝;靳景玉;;區(qū)域市場“煤電聯(lián)營”的博弈分析[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報.西部論壇;2006年02期

3 李成仁;高效;;煤電聯(lián)動的國際經(jīng)驗及啟示[J];成人高教學(xué)刊;2010年05期

4 陳小毅;周德群;;中國煤炭產(chǎn)業(yè)市場集中度的實證研究[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2010年02期

5 陳宗法;;發(fā)電行業(yè):轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展為哪般?[J];能源技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年01期

6 聶江洪;曾偉民;;在電力市場中引入電力需求彈性的研究[J];電網(wǎng)技術(shù);2008年11期

7 葉澤;電力市場中的市場勢力及其治理[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年07期

8 于立,劉勁松;中國煤、電關(guān)系的產(chǎn)業(yè)組織學(xué)分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年09期

9 于立;王建林;;縱向價格雙軌制:“電荒”的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析與出路[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年10期

10 于立宏;郁義鴻;;縱向結(jié)構(gòu)特性與電煤價格形成機制[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 中國華電集團(tuán)公司政策與法律部主任 陳宗法;[N];中國電力報;2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳星文;發(fā)電企業(yè)統(tǒng)一購煤策略分析[D];長沙理工大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1742487