中韓兩國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展及對(duì)中韓FTA啟示
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-30 19:08
本文選題:中韓FTA 切入點(diǎn):中韓汽車(chē)貿(mào)易 出處:《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文
【摘要】:2011年,中韓雙邊貿(mào)易額達(dá)到2456.3億美元,比建交之初增長(zhǎng)近50倍。目前,中國(guó)已成為韓國(guó)第一大貿(mào)易伙伴國(guó)、投資對(duì)象國(guó)、旅游目的地。與此同時(shí),韓國(guó)也成為僅次于美日的中國(guó)第三大貿(mào)易伙伴國(guó)。汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)在兩國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中所占的比重都非常大。與中國(guó)簽訂FTA,將會(huì)對(duì)韓國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)的出口及擴(kuò)大投資提供絕佳的機(jī)會(huì),在促進(jìn)兩國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的同時(shí)還會(huì)對(duì)兩國(guó)的共同產(chǎn)業(yè)化起到積極的作用。 在第二章,中韓兩國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)的現(xiàn)狀與特點(diǎn)中可以看出中國(guó)有資源的優(yōu)勢(shì),汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展空間也大。而韓國(guó)不具備以上兩項(xiàng)優(yōu)勢(shì)。不過(guò),韓國(guó)汽車(chē)大量投入研發(fā)費(fèi)用。所以技術(shù)創(chuàng)新因素非常強(qiáng)。在第三章,為了分析中韓兩國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)的出口現(xiàn)狀,選取從2003年到2011年的中韓兩國(guó)汽車(chē)出口數(shù)據(jù)做出RCA指數(shù)。還有,為了分析中韓兩國(guó)的汽車(chē)商品種類在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中是屬于出口型還是進(jìn)口型做出了TSI指數(shù)。結(jié)果表明韓國(guó)具有出口優(yōu)勢(shì)。目前韓國(guó)的汽車(chē)零部件(8708)、拖拉機(jī)(8701)、客車(chē)(8702)等對(duì)中國(guó)的貿(mào)易專業(yè)化指數(shù)還是具有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì),但從所考察的近幾年情況來(lái)看,這種優(yōu)勢(shì)正呈現(xiàn)出持續(xù)下降的趨勢(shì)。中韓兩國(guó)汽車(chē)出口企業(yè)的SWOT分析結(jié)果,中國(guó)汽車(chē)企業(yè)有低成本的優(yōu)勢(shì),中國(guó)汽車(chē)企業(yè)的劣勢(shì)是沒(méi)有規(guī);、中國(guó)氣車(chē)企業(yè)沒(méi)有品牌優(yōu)勢(shì)。韓國(guó)汽車(chē)企業(yè)在華進(jìn)入優(yōu)勢(shì)是與價(jià)格相比,質(zhì)量擁有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。劣勢(shì)是與領(lǐng)頭企業(yè)的技術(shù)差異、在中國(guó)市場(chǎng)缺乏豐富的戰(zhàn)略模型、品牌形象較低、近期流行的環(huán)保汽車(chē)的技術(shù)能力缺乏。第四章,提到了中韓進(jìn)行FTA的背景和動(dòng)機(jī)一中韓FTA對(duì)兩國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)的合作有利。 最后,做出了兩國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)的合作辦法等建議與結(jié)論。中韓兩國(guó)簽訂FTA的話,促進(jìn)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)效應(yīng)、規(guī);(yīng)、技術(shù)效應(yīng)。同時(shí)韓國(guó)可以具有遼闊的中國(guó)市場(chǎng)。2013年4月26日,中韓自貿(mào)區(qū)第五輪談判在黑龍江省哈爾濱市舉行。雙方就貨物貿(mào)易、服務(wù)貿(mào)易、投資及其他議題深入交換了意見(jiàn)。短期來(lái)看,中韓FTA對(duì)韓國(guó)汽車(chē)出口有利。不過(guò),長(zhǎng)期動(dòng)態(tài)效應(yīng)的話對(duì)中國(guó)帶來(lái)更大的好影響。因此,雙方一致同意繼續(xù)保持談判勢(shì)頭,盡快就談判模式達(dá)成共識(shí),早日取得互利雙贏的結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:In 2011, the bilateral trade volume between China and South Korea reached 245.63 billion US dollars, an increase of nearly 50 times since the establishment of diplomatic ties. At present, China has become South Korea's largest trading partner, with investment targets and tourist destinations. South Korea has also become the third largest trading partner of China after the United States and Japan. The automobile industry accounts for a very large share of the economic development of both countries. The signing of FTAA with China will provide an excellent opportunity for South Korea's auto industry to export and expand its investment. While promoting the development of automobile industry in both countries, it will also play a positive role in the joint industrialization of the two countries. In the second chapter, the current situation and characteristics of the automobile industry of China and South Korea can be seen that China has the advantage of resources, and the auto industry has a lot of room for development. But Korea does not have the above two advantages. However, Korea has invested a lot of R & D expenses. So the factors of technological innovation are very strong. In Chapter 3, in order to analyze the export status of China and South Korea, the RCA index is obtained from 2003 to 2011. In order to analyze whether the types of automobile commodities in China and South Korea are export or import type in international trade, the TSI index is obtained. The results show that South Korea has export advantage. At present, the automobile parts and components in Korea are 8708, tractors are 8701, and passenger cars are 8702. China's trade specialization index still has a competitive advantage. However, judging from the situation examined in recent years, this advantage is showing a continuous downward trend. According to the SWOT analysis of the automobile export enterprises of China and South Korea, the Chinese automobile enterprises have the advantage of low cost, and the disadvantage of the Chinese automobile enterprises is that they do not have a large scale. Chinese gas car enterprises have no brand advantages. Korean automobile enterprises have the advantage of competitive quality compared with price. The disadvantage is the technical difference with the leading enterprises, the lack of rich strategic model in the Chinese market, and the low brand image. In the fourth chapter, the background and motivation of FTA between China and South Korea is mentioned. The FTA of China and South Korea is beneficial to the cooperation of automobile industry between China and South Korea. Finally, the paper makes some suggestions and conclusions about the cooperation between the two countries' automobile industry. If China and South Korea sign FTA, it will promote competition effect, scale effect, technology effect. Meanwhile, Korea can have a vast Chinese market. On April 26, 2013, The fifth round of talks on the China-South Korea Free Trade Zone was held in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province. The two sides exchanged in-depth views on trade in goods, trade in services, investment and other issues. In the short term, China and South Korea FTA are favorable for South Korean auto exports. However, Therefore, both sides agreed to maintain the momentum of negotiations, reach a consensus on the negotiation model as soon as possible, and achieve mutually beneficial and win-win results at an early date.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:F426.471;F752.7;F416.471
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 余曉鐘,馮杉;4P、4C、4R營(yíng)銷理論比較分析[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2002年03期
,本文編號(hào):1687244
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shengchanguanlilunwen/1687244.html
最近更新
教材專著