本文選題：老字號　切入點(diǎn)：品牌價(jià)值　出處：《東華大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：21世紀(jì)是品牌經(jīng)濟(jì)的世紀(jì),而中國的現(xiàn)代品牌相對歐、美、日等發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)和國家而言,仍處于落后的位置。中國有1000多家老字號,其中歷史最長的甚至有五六百年。但是這些品牌沒有一個(gè)成為世界名牌。中華老字號有著現(xiàn)代品牌無法跨越的優(yōu)勢,但是由于基于社會性考慮的老字號價(jià)值和基于經(jīng)濟(jì)性考慮的老字號價(jià)值之間存在了巨大的差異,老字號的融資渠道受到了很大的限制,影響其進(jìn)一步發(fā)展。老字號有著不可替代的社會文化價(jià)值,因此本文提出應(yīng)該將老字號的社會文化價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)化為市場價(jià)值,以提升老字號的整體融資能力和市場競爭力。 首先,本文介紹了品牌、老字號及品牌價(jià)值評估研究的基本理論,界定了品牌、老字號及品牌價(jià)值的定義。通過對文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理,將已有的品牌價(jià)值評估方法分為傳統(tǒng)和現(xiàn)代典型的品牌價(jià)值評估法,并詳細(xì)介紹了四種品牌價(jià)值評估方法,分別是英特品公司的品牌價(jià)值評估法、艾克的品牌資產(chǎn)五星模型、北京名牌資產(chǎn)評估有限公司評估方法和忠誠因子法。通過文獻(xiàn)研究,本文發(fā)現(xiàn)已有的品牌價(jià)值評估模型考慮的因素并不全面,沒有一個(gè)評估模型考慮到了品牌的歷史文化價(jià)值和社會價(jià)值,因此現(xiàn)有的評估法并不適用于老字號。 本文創(chuàng)新性地建立了針對老字號的品牌價(jià)值評估模型。本文以英特品評估法為基礎(chǔ),綜合艾克的品牌評估模型以及老字號的特征,加入了創(chuàng)新能力、社會認(rèn)可、社會價(jià)值及文化價(jià)值這四項(xiàng)新的指標(biāo),構(gòu)建了一個(gè)針對老字號的全方位的品牌價(jià)值評估模型。并引入層次分析法和模糊綜合評價(jià)法來確定品牌作用指數(shù)、各指標(biāo)權(quán)重及品牌強(qiáng)度得分。 然后,本文以茅臺為例,對其品牌價(jià)值進(jìn)行評估,以驗(yàn)證模型的科學(xué)性與有效性。結(jié)果顯示利用國際通用的英特品法評估茅臺的品牌價(jià)值時(shí),茅臺的品牌價(jià)值被低估。最后,根據(jù)本文的評估結(jié)果,為茅臺品牌今后的發(fā)展提出了相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:The 21st century is the century of brand economy, and China's modern brands are still in a backward position compared with developed regions and countries such as Europe, the United States, Japan, etc. China has more than 1000 old brands. Among them, the longest history is even five or six hundred years. But none of these brands has become a world famous brand. The old Chinese brands have the advantage that modern brands cannot transcend. However, due to the huge difference between the value of the old brand based on social considerations and the value of the old brand based on economic considerations, the financing channel of the old brand has been greatly restricted. The old brand has irreplaceable social and cultural value, so this paper puts forward that the social and cultural value of the old brand should be transformed into the market value in order to enhance the overall financing ability and market competitiveness of the old brand. First of all, this paper introduces the basic theory of brand, old brand and brand value evaluation, defines the definition of brand, old brand and brand value. The existing brand value evaluation methods are divided into traditional and modern typical brand value evaluation methods, and four brand value evaluation methods are introduced in detail, which are the brand value evaluation method of Internet Company and the five-star model of Ike's brand equity. The evaluation method and loyalty factor method of Beijing famous Brand Asset Appraisal Co., Ltd. Through the literature research, this paper finds that the factors considered in the existing brand value evaluation model are not comprehensive. No evaluation model takes into account the historical, cultural and social value of the brand, so the existing evaluation method does not apply to the old brand. This paper creatively establishes the brand value evaluation model for the old brand. Based on the English product evaluation method, this paper integrates Ike's brand evaluation model and the characteristics of the old brand, and adds the innovation ability, social recognition, Four new indexes, social value and cultural value, are constructed to evaluate the brand value of the old brand, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method are introduced to determine the brand function index. Each index weight and brand strength score. Then, taking Maotai as an example, this paper evaluates its brand value to verify the scientific and validity of the model. The results show that the brand value of Moutai is underestimated when the international common international method of international products is used to evaluate the brand value of Moutai. According to the evaluation results of this paper, some suggestions are put forward for the future development of Maotai brand.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F273.2;F426.82

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉紅霞 ,楊杰 ,徐敏;英特公司的品牌評估模型[J];中華商標(biāo);2005年04期

2 張銳;張炎炎;周敏;;論品牌的內(nèi)涵與外延[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

3 王熹;;品牌價(jià)值評估體系及其方法選擇[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2012年03期

4 張紅林;;維護(hù)好品牌的“心智資源”[J];今日工程機(jī)械;2009年06期

5 范秀成,冷巖;品牌價(jià)值評估的忠誠因子法[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2000年05期

6 熊子書;中國三大香型白酒的研究(二)——醬香·茅臺篇[J];釀酒科技;2005年04期

7 林萬福;;從制酒工藝上看我省大曲醬香型白酒與茅臺酒的差距[J];釀酒;1993年04期

8 鄂晨宇;;市場經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下的品牌評估[J];中國集體經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2007年04期

9 江砂;;貴州茅臺酒股份有限公司榮獲“中國商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略創(chuàng)新獎”[J];釀酒科技;2009年12期

10 陸力斌;許秀珍;;品牌強(qiáng)度評估的指標(biāo)體系及方法[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2009年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張挺;區(qū)域品牌的價(jià)值評估[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張倩;品牌價(jià)值評估方法研究[D];東北大學(xué);2006年

2 汪永婕;電信品牌價(jià)值評價(jià)模型與價(jià)值塑造研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1682462