本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)研究　出處：《中央民族大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 鐵礦石 定價權(quán) 對策

【摘要】：鋼鐵工業(yè)是中國工業(yè)體系的基礎(chǔ)產(chǎn)業(yè),在國民經(jīng)濟中起著舉足輕重的作用,而鐵礦石作為鋼鐵冶煉的最基本原料,其重要性也不容忽視。隨著中國工業(yè)化和城鎮(zhèn)化進程的加快,鋼鐵工業(yè)對鐵礦石的需求量越來越大,自2003年開始,中國成為世界第一大鐵礦石消費國和進口國。然而在三大礦山控制鐵礦石定價權(quán)的背景下,國際鐵礦石價格不斷高漲,中國卻因在國際鐵礦石市場上議價能力弱,缺乏定價權(quán)而被迫成為鐵礦石進口價格的接受者。中國國際鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)的缺失,微觀上造成了中國鋼鐵企業(yè)產(chǎn)品成本上升同時對中國相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展造成了巨大的壓力；宏觀上對中國的經(jīng)濟利益與經(jīng)濟安全產(chǎn)生了巨大的影響。 隨著國際鐵礦石定價機制的金融化趨勢逐漸加強,鐵礦石進口價格的不確定性將更加劇烈,中國鐵礦石進口大國與定價權(quán)缺失這一矛盾在新形勢下將更加激化。因此,在這種背景下,本文通過研究國際鐵礦石定價的內(nèi)在機制,在深入分析中國鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)缺失原因的基礎(chǔ)上,為中國爭取鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)提出原則和對策。 本文的研究內(nèi)容共分為四個部分： 第一部分主要闡述了本文的研究背景與意義以及梳理了國內(nèi)外的研究現(xiàn)狀,并介紹了研究內(nèi)容與方法。 第二部分從第二章收集大量數(shù)據(jù)分析了鐵礦石國際市場供需現(xiàn)狀以及國際鐵礦石定價機制的歷史演進過程,到第三章闡述了中國鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)缺失的現(xiàn)狀以及其對中國經(jīng)濟等各方面的影響,為第三部分做了鋪墊。 第三部分是本文的重點和目的,第四章分析原因,第五章提出對策。第四章深入探討了中國國際鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)缺失的原因。一方面,國際寡頭壟斷以及國際金融資本的滲透是中國國際鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)缺失的深層原因。另一方面,中國的經(jīng)濟政策和中國鋼鐵工業(yè)的基礎(chǔ)薄弱使得中國在國際鐵礦石進口定價中進一步喪失定價權(quán)。第五章從原則、政府、企業(yè)三個方面闡述了中國爭取國際鐵礦石進口定價權(quán)的對策。 第四部分為本文結(jié)論,總結(jié)了全文并對該話題進行了展望。
[Abstract]:Iron and steel industry is the basic industry of China's industrial system, which plays an important role in the national economy, and iron ore as the most basic raw material for iron and steel smelting. With the acceleration of industrialization and urbanization in China, the iron and steel industry is in increasing demand for iron ore, which has been in demand since 2003. China has become the world's largest consumer and importer of iron ore. However, in the context of the three major mines to control the pricing of iron ore, the international iron ore prices are rising. However, because of the weak bargaining power in the international iron ore market and the lack of pricing power, China is forced to become the recipient of the import price of iron ore. At the same time, it causes tremendous pressure on the development of related industries in China. Macroscopically to China's economic interests and economic security has a huge impact. With the trend of financialization of international iron ore pricing mechanism, the uncertainty of iron ore import price will become more acute. The contradiction between China's big iron ore importing country and the lack of pricing power will be intensified in the new situation. Therefore, in this context, this paper studies the internal mechanism of international iron ore pricing. On the basis of deeply analyzing the reasons for the lack of pricing right of iron ore import in China, the paper puts forward the principles and countermeasures for China to strive for the pricing right of iron ore import. The research content of this paper is divided into four parts: The first part mainly elaborates the research background and significance of this paper, combs the domestic and foreign research present situation, and introduces the research content and the method. The second part collects a lot of data from the second chapter to analyze the current situation of iron ore supply and demand in the international market and the historical evolution process of international iron ore pricing mechanism. In the third chapter, the author expounds the current situation of the lack of pricing right of iron ore import in China and its influence on China's economy, which paves the way for the third part. The third part is the focus and purpose of this paper. Chapter 4th analyzes the reasons, 5th chapter puts forward the countermeasures. Chapter 4th deeply discusses the reasons for the lack of pricing right of China's international iron ore import. On the one hand. The international oligopoly and the infiltration of international financial capital are the deep reasons for the lack of pricing power of China's international iron ore import. On the other hand. China's economic policy and the weak foundation of China's iron and steel industry make China further lose pricing power in international iron ore import pricing. Chapter 5th from the principles, the government. Three aspects of the enterprise elaborated China for international iron ore import pricing rights countermeasures. Part 4th is the conclusion of this paper, summarizes the full text and prospects for this topic.
【學位授予單位】：中央民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F752.61;F416.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐川;黃希;;集體議價程序與鐵礦石價格談判失利[J];當代經(jīng)濟;2007年08期

2 鄭先勇;黃漢民;;中國鐵礦石談判失利的成因分析——基于供需方博弈視角[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2010年05期

3 肖明;吳慧香;褚鵬程;;大宗商品定價金融化背景下進口鐵礦石定價的可能路徑[J];中國管理信息化;2012年05期

4 李德軍;商曉麗;;我國鐵礦石進口面臨的問題、原因及應(yīng)對策略分析[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2012年01期

5 鄒禮卿;;鐵礦石“話語權(quán)”困局繼續(xù)[J];國土資源導(dǎo)刊;2011年Z1期

6 董方軍;袁倫渠;;國際鐵礦石市場的契約安排頻譜——審視國際鐵礦石價格機制的新視角[J];上海經(jīng)濟研究;2009年08期

7 王中亮;;國際定價權(quán)缺失的原因及其對策——基于我國鐵礦石價格談判失利的思考[J];價格理論與實踐;2006年08期

8 劉寶發(fā);王震;毛箭;;國際鐵礦石定價機制及其發(fā)展[J];價格理論與實踐;2008年01期

9 劉曉亮;張曉寧;;我國鋼鐵企業(yè)鐵礦石定價話語權(quán)缺失的原因與對策[J];價格理論與實踐;2010年03期

10 安毅;常清;鄭薈娟;;鐵礦石指數(shù)期貨與國際定價權(quán)研究[J];價格理論與實踐;2010年06期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 陶靖;中國爭取鐵礦石定價權(quán)的對策分析[D];中國地質(zhì)大學（北京）;2011年

2 陳然;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈治理的中國鐵礦石進口貿(mào)易市場勢力構(gòu)建研究[D];浙江大學;2011年

3 孫少敏;賣方壟斷下中國提高鐵礦石議價力的策略研究[D];北京交通大學;2011年

4 胡彥利;中國進口鐵礦石的價格機制及定價權(quán)分析[D];天津財經(jīng)大學;2011年

5 朱明s，

本文編號：1391764