基于潮流追蹤的輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒ㄑ芯?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-02 22:27
本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于潮流追蹤的輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒ㄑ芯?/strong> 出處：《華北電力大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章： 輸電費(fèi)用 潮流追蹤 負(fù)向潮流 雙邊交易 分?jǐn)偡椒?/b>
【摘要】：輸電網(wǎng)具有自然壟斷性,作為輸送電能的唯一載體其是一種具有成本的稀缺資源。電網(wǎng)公司需要通過向用戶(包括發(fā)電廠和負(fù)荷)收取一定的費(fèi)用維持自身的運(yùn)行；用戶也希望電網(wǎng)公司為所有使用者提供公平的輸電服務(wù),合理分?jǐn)傒旊娰M(fèi)用；輸電網(wǎng)作為一種稀缺資源也必須進(jìn)行優(yōu)化配置加以合理利用。一言以蔽之,合理分?jǐn)傒旊娰M(fèi)用是電網(wǎng)公司的需要,用戶的需要,更是資源優(yōu)化配置的需要。 輸電費(fèi)用的合理分?jǐn)傆袃蓚�層面的問題：一是確定合理的輸電服務(wù)準(zhǔn)許收入即合理的待攤輸電費(fèi)用,二是待攤輸電費(fèi)用通過合理的分?jǐn)偡椒ǚ謹(jǐn)偨o用戶。輸電費(fèi)用主要由政府核準(zhǔn)的輸電成本、政府允許的收益和相應(yīng)的稅金組成。合理的輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒☉?yīng)能保障電網(wǎng)公司費(fèi)用的回收、向用戶提供有效的經(jīng)濟(jì)信號、公平合理、有利于電網(wǎng)安全運(yùn)行等。本文對輸電費(fèi)用的構(gòu)成、特點(diǎn)、分?jǐn)傇瓌t和輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒ㄟM(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的綜述,并簡要概述了目前世界各國分?jǐn)傒旊娰M(fèi)用所使用的方法。 在此基礎(chǔ)上,針對聯(lián)營電力市場模式下潮流追蹤法不適于處理負(fù)向潮流的問題,提出了一種基于潮流追蹤和廣義發(fā)電分配因子(GGDF)的輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒ǎ菏紫冉梃b優(yōu)勢潮流的思想將待攤輸電費(fèi)用分為兩類；然后,依據(jù)“誰受益,誰承擔(dān)”的原則,其中一類費(fèi)用通過潮流追蹤法在全體用戶中分?jǐn)?另外一類費(fèi)用根據(jù)GGDF僅在正向潮流用戶中分?jǐn)�。論文用一個5節(jié)點(diǎn)算例驗(yàn)證了方法的可行性和優(yōu)越性。 針對混合電力市場模式下潮流追蹤法不適于處理雙邊交易的問題,論文首先通過面向交易的潮流靈敏度法確定雙邊交易的潮流貢獻(xiàn),保證了雙邊交易中交易雙方的一體性；進(jìn)行集中交易的發(fā)電廠和負(fù)荷的潮流貢獻(xiàn)仍通過潮流追蹤法確定；然后按照與聯(lián)營電力市場中相同的處理負(fù)向潮流的方式,將待攤輸電費(fèi)用分為兩類,一類費(fèi)用由全體用戶承擔(dān),另外一類費(fèi)用僅由正向潮流用戶承擔(dān),在雙邊交易與進(jìn)行集中交易的用戶之間進(jìn)行費(fèi)用分?jǐn)�；最后將雙邊交易的費(fèi)用在其內(nèi)部交易雙方之間進(jìn)行分?jǐn)?分?jǐn)偙壤赐ㄟ^潮流追蹤法確定的各自的潮流貢獻(xiàn)的比例。算例證明了本方法的有效性與實(shí)用性。
[Abstract]:Transmission network has a natural monopoly. As the only carrier of electric energy transmission it is a scarce resource with cost. Power grid companies need to charge users (including power plants and loads) to maintain their own operation at a certain cost. Users also want grid companies to provide fair transmission services to all users and to share transmission costs reasonably; Transmission network as a scarce resource must be optimized and rationally utilized. In a word, the reasonable allocation of transmission costs is the need of grid companies, the needs of users, but also the needs of optimal allocation of resources. The reasonable allocation of transmission costs has two aspects: one is to determine the reasonable allowable income of transmission services, that is, the reasonable transmission costs to be amortized. Second, the transmission cost to be amortized is apportioned to the users through a reasonable allocation method. The transmission cost is mainly approved by the government. Reasonable transmission cost allocation method should be able to ensure the recovery of grid company expenses, provide effective economic signals to users, and be fair and reasonable. In this paper, the composition, characteristics, allocation principles and methods of transmission cost allocation are summarized in detail. The methods used to share the transmission cost among countries in the world are briefly summarized. On this basis, the method of power flow tracing is not suitable to deal with the problem of negative power flow. A method of transmission cost allocation based on power flow tracing and generalized generation distribution factor (GGDF) is proposed. Firstly, the unamortized transmission cost is divided into two categories based on the idea of superior power flow. Then, according to the "who benefits, who bears" principle, one of the expenses is shared among all users through the power flow tracking method. The other kind of cost is only apportioned among forward power flow users according to GGDF. A five-node example is used to verify the feasibility and superiority of the method. In view of the problem that the power flow tracing method is not suitable for dealing with bilateral transactions in hybrid power market mode, the paper first determines the power flow contribution of bilateral transactions through the transaction-oriented power flow sensitivity method. It ensures the unity of both sides in the bilateral transaction; The power flow contribution of the power plant and load for centralized trading is still determined by the power flow tracing method; Then according to the same way of dealing with the negative power flow in the associated power market, the transmission costs to be amortized are divided into two categories: one is borne by all users, the other is only borne by the positive power flow users. (B) Cost-sharing between bilateral transactions and users of centralized transactions; Finally, the cost of bilateral transaction is apportioned between the two sides of the transaction, that is, the proportion of the contribution of power flow determined by the power flow tracing method. The effectiveness and practicability of this method are proved by an example.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F426.61
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張愛萍;林其友;龐彥;;電力市場輸配電綜合成本定價(jià)法綜述[J];安徽電力;2009年02期
2 謝開貴,李春燕,周念成,趙霞,周家啟;一類潮流跟蹤算法的可行性分析[J];電工技術(shù)學(xué)報(bào);2005年08期
3 尹麗君;張集;劉文穎;;自環(huán)流網(wǎng)絡(luò)潮流追蹤法的研究[J];電氣應(yīng)用;2007年07期
4 黃安平;劉瑗瑗;蔣金良;;電力市場下潮流追蹤研究[J];電氣應(yīng)用;2010年21期
5 宋九飛;;影響500kV送電線路工程造價(jià)敏感因素分析[J];電力建設(shè);2007年02期
6 李衛(wèi)東,魏立明,孫輝,肖宏飛;潮流追蹤算法比較研究[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期
7 荊朝霞,段獻(xiàn)忠,文福拴,嚴(yán)正,倪以信,吳復(fù)立;輸電系統(tǒng)固定成本分?jǐn)倖栴}[J];電力系統(tǒng)自動化;2003年16期
8 王功濤,傅書，
本文編號：1371197
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shengchanguanlilunwen/1371197.html
本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于潮流追蹤的輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒ㄑ芯?/strong> 出處：《華北電力大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章： 輸電費(fèi)用 潮流追蹤 負(fù)向潮流 雙邊交易 分?jǐn)偡椒?/b>
【摘要】：輸電網(wǎng)具有自然壟斷性,作為輸送電能的唯一載體其是一種具有成本的稀缺資源。電網(wǎng)公司需要通過向用戶(包括發(fā)電廠和負(fù)荷)收取一定的費(fèi)用維持自身的運(yùn)行；用戶也希望電網(wǎng)公司為所有使用者提供公平的輸電服務(wù),合理分?jǐn)傒旊娰M(fèi)用；輸電網(wǎng)作為一種稀缺資源也必須進(jìn)行優(yōu)化配置加以合理利用。一言以蔽之,合理分?jǐn)傒旊娰M(fèi)用是電網(wǎng)公司的需要,用戶的需要,更是資源優(yōu)化配置的需要。 輸電費(fèi)用的合理分?jǐn)傆袃蓚�層面的問題：一是確定合理的輸電服務(wù)準(zhǔn)許收入即合理的待攤輸電費(fèi)用,二是待攤輸電費(fèi)用通過合理的分?jǐn)偡椒ǚ謹(jǐn)偨o用戶。輸電費(fèi)用主要由政府核準(zhǔn)的輸電成本、政府允許的收益和相應(yīng)的稅金組成。合理的輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒☉?yīng)能保障電網(wǎng)公司費(fèi)用的回收、向用戶提供有效的經(jīng)濟(jì)信號、公平合理、有利于電網(wǎng)安全運(yùn)行等。本文對輸電費(fèi)用的構(gòu)成、特點(diǎn)、分?jǐn)傇瓌t和輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒ㄟM(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的綜述,并簡要概述了目前世界各國分?jǐn)傒旊娰M(fèi)用所使用的方法。 在此基礎(chǔ)上,針對聯(lián)營電力市場模式下潮流追蹤法不適于處理負(fù)向潮流的問題,提出了一種基于潮流追蹤和廣義發(fā)電分配因子(GGDF)的輸電費(fèi)用分?jǐn)偡椒ǎ菏紫冉梃b優(yōu)勢潮流的思想將待攤輸電費(fèi)用分為兩類；然后,依據(jù)“誰受益,誰承擔(dān)”的原則,其中一類費(fèi)用通過潮流追蹤法在全體用戶中分?jǐn)?另外一類費(fèi)用根據(jù)GGDF僅在正向潮流用戶中分?jǐn)�。論文用一個5節(jié)點(diǎn)算例驗(yàn)證了方法的可行性和優(yōu)越性。 針對混合電力市場模式下潮流追蹤法不適于處理雙邊交易的問題,論文首先通過面向交易的潮流靈敏度法確定雙邊交易的潮流貢獻(xiàn),保證了雙邊交易中交易雙方的一體性；進(jìn)行集中交易的發(fā)電廠和負(fù)荷的潮流貢獻(xiàn)仍通過潮流追蹤法確定；然后按照與聯(lián)營電力市場中相同的處理負(fù)向潮流的方式,將待攤輸電費(fèi)用分為兩類,一類費(fèi)用由全體用戶承擔(dān),另外一類費(fèi)用僅由正向潮流用戶承擔(dān),在雙邊交易與進(jìn)行集中交易的用戶之間進(jìn)行費(fèi)用分?jǐn)�；最后將雙邊交易的費(fèi)用在其內(nèi)部交易雙方之間進(jìn)行分?jǐn)?分?jǐn)偙壤赐ㄟ^潮流追蹤法確定的各自的潮流貢獻(xiàn)的比例。算例證明了本方法的有效性與實(shí)用性。
[Abstract]:Transmission network has a natural monopoly. As the only carrier of electric energy transmission it is a scarce resource with cost. Power grid companies need to charge users (including power plants and loads) to maintain their own operation at a certain cost. Users also want grid companies to provide fair transmission services to all users and to share transmission costs reasonably; Transmission network as a scarce resource must be optimized and rationally utilized. In a word, the reasonable allocation of transmission costs is the need of grid companies, the needs of users, but also the needs of optimal allocation of resources. The reasonable allocation of transmission costs has two aspects: one is to determine the reasonable allowable income of transmission services, that is, the reasonable transmission costs to be amortized. Second, the transmission cost to be amortized is apportioned to the users through a reasonable allocation method. The transmission cost is mainly approved by the government. Reasonable transmission cost allocation method should be able to ensure the recovery of grid company expenses, provide effective economic signals to users, and be fair and reasonable. In this paper, the composition, characteristics, allocation principles and methods of transmission cost allocation are summarized in detail. The methods used to share the transmission cost among countries in the world are briefly summarized. On this basis, the method of power flow tracing is not suitable to deal with the problem of negative power flow. A method of transmission cost allocation based on power flow tracing and generalized generation distribution factor (GGDF) is proposed. Firstly, the unamortized transmission cost is divided into two categories based on the idea of superior power flow. Then, according to the "who benefits, who bears" principle, one of the expenses is shared among all users through the power flow tracking method. The other kind of cost is only apportioned among forward power flow users according to GGDF. A five-node example is used to verify the feasibility and superiority of the method. In view of the problem that the power flow tracing method is not suitable for dealing with bilateral transactions in hybrid power market mode, the paper first determines the power flow contribution of bilateral transactions through the transaction-oriented power flow sensitivity method. It ensures the unity of both sides in the bilateral transaction; The power flow contribution of the power plant and load for centralized trading is still determined by the power flow tracing method; Then according to the same way of dealing with the negative power flow in the associated power market, the transmission costs to be amortized are divided into two categories: one is borne by all users, the other is only borne by the positive power flow users. (B) Cost-sharing between bilateral transactions and users of centralized transactions; Finally, the cost of bilateral transaction is apportioned between the two sides of the transaction, that is, the proportion of the contribution of power flow determined by the power flow tracing method. The effectiveness and practicability of this method are proved by an example.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F426.61
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張愛萍;林其友;龐彥;;電力市場輸配電綜合成本定價(jià)法綜述[J];安徽電力;2009年02期
2 謝開貴,李春燕,周念成,趙霞,周家啟;一類潮流跟蹤算法的可行性分析[J];電工技術(shù)學(xué)報(bào);2005年08期
3 尹麗君;張集;劉文穎;;自環(huán)流網(wǎng)絡(luò)潮流追蹤法的研究[J];電氣應(yīng)用;2007年07期
4 黃安平;劉瑗瑗;蔣金良;;電力市場下潮流追蹤研究[J];電氣應(yīng)用;2010年21期
5 宋九飛;;影響500kV送電線路工程造價(jià)敏感因素分析[J];電力建設(shè);2007年02期
6 李衛(wèi)東,魏立明,孫輝,肖宏飛;潮流追蹤算法比較研究[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期
7 荊朝霞,段獻(xiàn)忠,文福拴,嚴(yán)正,倪以信,吳復(fù)立;輸電系統(tǒng)固定成本分?jǐn)倖栴}[J];電力系統(tǒng)自動化;2003年16期
8 王功濤,傅書，
本文編號：1371197
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shengchanguanlilunwen/1371197.html
最近更新
教材專著
