發(fā)布時(shí)間：2023-04-09 19:34

　　港口在全球供應(yīng)鏈中扮演著至關(guān)重要的角色,因此加強(qiáng)供應(yīng)鏈和港口運(yùn)營(yíng)可以降低與裝卸作業(yè)相關(guān)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),因此,本研究的目的是確定和評(píng)估首選的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理替代方案,降低危險(xiǎn)品裝卸期間的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和危險(xiǎn)貨物。該研究基于層次分析法(AHP),研究利益相關(guān)者對(duì)于降低運(yùn)營(yíng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)方案的觀點(diǎn),得出了替代方案,提出了加強(qiáng)港口風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制管理的措施。本研究將SCOR模型與港口企業(yè)供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的結(jié)果相結(jié)合,根據(jù)港口企業(yè)供應(yīng)鏈運(yùn)作的特點(diǎn)將特馬港SCOR風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理分為五個(gè)模塊,其中包括:港口服務(wù)系統(tǒng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),危險(xiǎn)貨物風(fēng)險(xiǎn),港口運(yùn)營(yíng)人員,工作環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)以及工廠和設(shè)備風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。共分發(fā)150份問(wèn)卷,共有128位受訪者正確填寫(xiě)并提交了問(wèn)卷,占85.3%的答復(fù)率�；谥鳂�(biāo)準(zhǔn)層的權(quán)重,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)R1到R5的指數(shù)權(quán)重分別為0.080、0.366、0.068、0.399和0.087。第一個(gè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)指標(biāo)-港口服務(wù)系統(tǒng),第三個(gè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)指標(biāo)-港口操作人員和最后一個(gè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)指標(biāo)-工廠和設(shè)備相對(duì)較低。結(jié)果表明,危險(xiǎn)貨物風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)是最優(yōu)先考慮。優(yōu)先考慮的最高選擇是防止跌落和掉落的物體(0.188),緊接著是危險(xiǎn)的貨物缺陷狀況(0.153)。最不推薦的替代方法是專業(yè)技能和培訓(xùn),緊隨其后的是裝...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：86 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Introduction
        1.1.1.Evolution of Stevedore Operation in Ghana
        1.1.2 Evolution of Shipping Lines
        1.1.3 Dangerous Goods
        1.1.4 Risks involved in Stevedoring dangerous cargo
    1.2 Statement of the research problem
    1.3 Objectives of the Research
        1.3.1 Research Objectives
        1.3.2 Justification of the study
    1.4 Organization of the Study
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Scope
    2.2 Definition of concepts
    2.3 The Actual Situation
    2.4 The Research Status
    2.5 Relevant theory and its application to this paper
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
    3.0 RESEARCH METHODS
    3.1 Research Design
        3.1.1 Data Collection Procedure
        3.1.2 Questionnaire Design
        3.1.3 The Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)
        3.1.4 Implementing the AHP
        3.1.5 Tema Port stevedoring dangerous cargo Risk Identification and the construction of an evaluation model
        3.1.6 Construction of the SCOR-based Tema Port Stevedoring dangerous cargo Risk Assessment Model
        3.1.7 Sampling Technique and sample Size
        3.1.8 Weight calculation and Consistency Check and Analysis
    3.2 Ethical considerations
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    4.1 Tema Port Stevedoring Risk Assessment
    4.2 AHP Model Building Steps
    4.3 Criteria Priorities
    4.4 Global Alternative Priorities
    4.5 Consistency
    4.6 Discussion
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Conclusion
    5.2 Recommendations
    5.3 Limitations
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
    Appendix 1:Questionnaire
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



本文編號(hào)：3787608