本文選題：“回應” + 民生政策��； 參考：《中州學刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：重大民生政策風險評估中引入社會參與,是實現(xiàn)決策科學化的客觀要求。但在我國重大民生政策風險評估的社會參與中,特別是在"互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+"的背景下,參與主體利益多元、參與方式多樣,而政府回應方式單一、政府與社會回應價值向度的不同等制約了社會公眾對政策風險主張的充分表達,降低了社會參與的有效性,影響了政策共識的達成。應該通過回應渠道拓展、回應方式創(chuàng)新、回應網(wǎng)絡構建等來促進重大民生政策風險評估中的社會參與,以更好地適應"互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+"背景下社會參與的新變化給政府回應帶來的現(xiàn)實挑戰(zhàn),有效彌合多元主體間的政策感知差異和意見分歧,切實增強政策的可接受度。
[Abstract]:The introduction of social participation in the risk assessment of major livelihood policies is an objective requirement for scientific decision-making. However, in the social participation in the risk assessment of major livelihood policies in China, especially in the context of "Internet", the main interests of the participants are diverse, and the ways of participation are diverse, while the government responds in a single way. The difference between the value dimension of government and social response restricts the full expression of public opinion on policy risk, reduces the effectiveness of social participation, and affects the reaching of policy consensus. Social participation in the risk assessment of major livelihood policies should be promoted through the expansion of response channels, the innovation of response methods, the construction of response networks, and so on. In order to better adapt to the new changes of social participation under the background of "Internet", the government should respond to the practical challenges, effectively bridge the differences of policy perception and opinions among various subjects, and strengthen the policy acceptability.
【作者單位】： 重慶行政學院應急管理培訓中心;
【基金】：重慶市社會科學規(guī)劃青年項目“地方政府重大民生政策風險評估公眾參與機制創(chuàng)新”(2016QNSH21)
【分類號】：C934
，

本文編號：1956413