本文選題：科普績效 + 綜合評價�。� 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：科普是提高公民科學(xué)素質(zhì)的重要途徑和實現(xiàn)方式。作為國家基礎(chǔ)教育與基礎(chǔ)建設(shè)的重要組成部分,科普工作是一項宏偉的社會工程,意義深遠。然而,科普的績效怎樣,如何科學(xué)合理地評價科普績效,是開展科普工作必須考慮的重要因素。國內(nèi)外關(guān)于科普績效評價的研究相對比較少,評價體系并不統(tǒng)一,缺乏定量和系統(tǒng)的分析與研究。因此,建立科學(xué)實用的科普績效評價指標體系,科學(xué)客觀地評價科普績效,全面準確地反映科普發(fā)展情況,為政府及相關(guān)部門提供管理和決策依據(jù),促進科普事業(yè)的健康發(fā)展。本文首先界定了區(qū)域科普績效相關(guān)概念的內(nèi)涵,對科普績效評價的相關(guān)理論進行了回顧和簡要評述。其次,綜合考慮指標的全面性和代表性,從科普人員、科普設(shè)施、科普經(jīng)費、科普宣傳和科普活動等5個方面構(gòu)建了區(qū)域科普績效評價指標體系,并采用距優(yōu)平方和法與變異系數(shù)法聯(lián)合對各指標進行賦權(quán),運用投影尋蹤評價模型對2013年我國31個省市區(qū)的科普績效進行評價分析。在此基礎(chǔ)上,利用泰爾指數(shù)對科普績效的區(qū)域差異進行分析。研究結(jié)論表明:(1)整體來看,我國各省域的科普績效不平衡,北京、上海、天津地區(qū)在科普績效上具有明顯優(yōu)勢,大致呈現(xiàn)出從東部、中部到西部依次遞減的趨勢;(2)區(qū)域科普績效的“東中西”梯度已不是很明顯,部分西部地區(qū)科普績效的相對指標并不落后,排名比較靠前;(3)為更客觀比較各地區(qū)科普績效的差異情況,運用泰爾指數(shù)進行測算,結(jié)果表明在總體差異中地區(qū)間的差異和B類區(qū)域的內(nèi)部差異比較顯著。
[Abstract]:Popular science is an important way to improve the scientific quality of citizens. As an important part of national basic education and infrastructure construction, the work of popularizing science is a grand social project with far-reaching significance. However, the performance of science popularization and how to evaluate it scientifically and reasonably are the important factors that must be considered in carrying out the work of science popularization. At home and abroad, the research on performance evaluation of popular science is relatively few, the evaluation system is not uniform, lack of quantitative and systematic analysis and research. Therefore, the establishment of scientific and practical performance evaluation index system of science popularization, scientific and objective evaluation of science performance, comprehensively and accurately reflect the development of science popularization, provide management and decision-making basis for the government and related departments, and promote the healthy development of science popularization. Firstly, this paper defines the connotation of the concept of regional popular science performance, and reviews the relevant theories of science popularization performance evaluation. Secondly, considering the comprehensiveness and representativeness of the index, this paper constructs the regional performance evaluation index system of science popularization from five aspects: science popularization personnel, science popularization facilities, science popularization funds, science popularization propaganda and science popularization activities. The authors use the square sum method of distance optimization and the coefficient of variation method to give weight to each index, and use projection pursuit evaluation model to evaluate and analyze the performance of science popularization in 31 provinces and municipalities in China in 2013. On this basis, the Tyr index is used to analyze the regional differences of popular science performance. The conclusion of the study shows that, overall, the performance of science popularization in various provinces of China is unbalanced. Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin have obvious advantages in the performance of science popularization. The gradient of regional science popularization performance is no longer obvious, and the relative index of science popularization performance in some western regions is not backward. In order to compare the differences of the performance of science popularization in different regions objectively, we use the Thiel index to measure the results. The results show that the differences between the regions and the internal differences of the B regions are significant in the overall differences.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G315

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張志敏;鄭念;;大型科普活動效果評估框架研究[J];科技管理研究;2013年24期

2 任嶸嶸;鄭念;趙萌;;我國地區(qū)科普能力評價——基于熵權(quán)法-GEM[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟;2013年02期

3 胡萌;朱安紅;;江西省科普效果指標體系及綜合評價研究[J];科技廣場;2012年12期

4 謝小軍;;我國科普工作面臨的形勢和挑戰(zhàn)[J];中國科技信息;2012年22期

5 李婷;;地區(qū)科普能力指標體系的構(gòu)建及評價研究[J];中國科技論壇;2011年07期

6 鄧澤華;;我國環(huán)�？破展ぷ鳜F(xiàn)狀及對策[J];法制與社會;2010年30期

7 史路平;安文;;科普項目評估制度化探析[J];科普研究;2010年01期

8 胥彥玲;何丹;吳晨生;;國外科技館建設(shè)對我國的啟示[J];科普研究;2010年01期

9 楊英;;借鑒國外科技教育經(jīng)驗發(fā)展青少年科普事業(yè)[J];科技通報;2009年04期

10 覃崢嶸;李耀先;;廣西氣象科普工作的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展對策[J];氣象研究與應(yīng)用;2009年02期

，

本文編號：1999988