本文選題：金融專利　切入點：商業(yè)方法專利　出處：《華中科技大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：金融是現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟的核心,金融活動己經(jīng)成為整個經(jīng)濟活動的基礎和核心,在一國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中處于舉足輕重的地位,金融業(yè)的發(fā)展離不開金融專利的長效支持,對專利研發(fā)者開發(fā)出的金融產(chǎn)品授予專利權是對研發(fā)者的智力勞動成果的最有效保護,會極大的激發(fā)研發(fā)者的創(chuàng)造積極性。金融專利審查標準的制定和執(zhí)行對金融業(yè)的前景影響深遠,基于此本文將在《專利審查指南2010年版》以及國家知識產(chǎn)權局2004年10月頒布的《商業(yè)方法發(fā)明相關專利申請的審查細則(試行)》的基礎上對金融專利審查標準進行深入的研究和探討,進而提出對我國金融專利的審查標準制定的建議。 金融專利的審查標準是賦予金融專利專利權的基本標準要求,各國根據(jù)自己國家的具體國情制定自己的審查標準�！吨腥A人民共和國專利法》自1985年4月1日實施以來,在2000年8月25日,做了第二次修改,都是對技術專利的審查指南的規(guī)定,只涉及到了金融專利的第一類專利,諸如點鈔機、保險柜等以技術為特征的金融專利。到2004年10月,國家知識產(chǎn)權局頒布了《商業(yè)方法發(fā)明相關專利申請的審查細則(試行)》本,其間明確規(guī)定了商業(yè)方法相關的發(fā)明專利申請的可專利性的審查標準。在執(zhí)行了近兩年后以2006年版的《審查指南》生效宣告失效。之后2008年8月的第三次修訂,2009年10月1日生效的《審查指南》,都沒有對商業(yè)方法類金融專利的審查細則,2010年版的《審查指南》在第九章有關于涉及計算機程序的發(fā)明專利申請審查的若干規(guī)定,但是,并沒有明確或者說單獨列出一節(jié)對金融專利進行規(guī)定。目前美、日、歐以及國內的專家學者、研究生都在對金融專利進行進一步的研究,審查標準的研究是未來的熱點。各國的金融業(yè)以及金融專利的競爭與合作,首先是金融專利審查標準的競爭與合作。本文采用比較研究和具體案例分析的方法,從金融專利的審查標準的形式標準和實質標準入手進行研究,最終提出符合我國現(xiàn)狀和未來趨勢的金融專利審查標準的建議,以供國家立法參考。 全文除摘要外共分為五個部分和結論,摘要部分是對全文主要觀點內容和論文結構的簡要介紹。 第一部分,緒論。是對研究的議題介紹、研究的現(xiàn)實意義和理論意義、研究對象和范圍限定、研究思路和框架、研究的主要內容、主要研究方法和可能的創(chuàng)新點等的介紹。 第二部分,金融專利的界定。是對金融專利的涵義與特征、金融專利的涵義以及相關概念介紹、金融專利的特征、金融專利的研究和應用現(xiàn)狀、金融專利的國內外研究現(xiàn)狀、金融專利在金融業(yè)中的運用現(xiàn)狀描述等的介紹和描述。 第三部分,金融專利可專利性(形式)標準分析。是對金融專利可專利性概述、金融專利授權的一般標準介紹、國際金融專利授權的形式標準介紹、我國金融專利授權的形式標準介紹、美、日、歐金融專利可專利性標準趨勢分析、我國金融專利可專利性標準界定、我國已授權的金融專利案例分析、我國目前金融專利可專利性標準分析、我國將來金融專利可專利性最佳采用標準建議等的介紹和分析。 第四部分,美、日、歐及我國金融專利實質審查標準對比研究。是對美國、日本、歐盟的金融專利的實質審查標準的介紹和對比分析研究。 第五部分,我國將來金融專利審查標準創(chuàng)建建議。是對我國金融專利審查標準創(chuàng)建的必要性的分析、我國未來金融專利形式標準和實質標準的建立的建議。 結論:總結全文的研究結果,和對主要觀點做出總結。
[Abstract]:Finance is the core of modern economy, financial activities has become the foundation and core of the whole economic activities, plays an important role in the economic development in a country, the long-term support of the development of the financial sector cannot do without the financial patent, patent for developers to develop financial products patent is the most effective protection for developers intellectual labor, will greatly stimulate the developers to create enthusiasm. Formulate financial patent examination standard and Prospects on the implementation of the financial industry has far-reaching influence, this article will patent applications for inventions related to the review of the rules in the < 2010 Edition > and the guidelines for patent examination method of commercial State Intellectual Property Bureau issued in October 2004 "(for Trial Implementation Based on >) on the basis of the financial patent examination standards for in-depth research and study, and puts forward the development of China's patent examination standards for financial advice.
Financial patent review standard is a basic standard request gives financial patent right, all according to their specific conditions of countries to develop standards. People's Republic of China patent law of its own since April 1, 1985, in August 25, 2000, second to do a modification, are specified in the patent examination guidelines on technology, relates only to the first patent financial patent, such as currency-counting machine, financial patent safes and other characteristics of the technology. By October 2004, the State Intellectual Property Office issued the "business method patent applications for inventions related to the review of rules (Trial)", during which specifies the examination standard of business method related to the application for a patent for invention patent. In the past two years after the execution. In the 2006 edition of the "Review Guide > lapsed into effect. After the August 2008 third revision, effective October 1, 2009" Review Guide >, are not on the business method patent review the financial rules, regulations, guidelines for the review of the 2010 edition of < > are related to the computer patent application review process in the ninth chapter, however, there is no clear or separately one of the provisions of the financial patent. At present, the United States, experts and scholars in Europe as well as domestic, graduate students in financial patent for further study, the standard of review is the next hot spot. The financial industry and financial patent competition and cooperation, competition and cooperation is the first financial patent examination standard. This paper uses the method of comparative study and analysis of specific cases, from the financial patent review the standard form and essence standards of research, finally puts forward the current situation of our country and the future trend of the patent examination standards of financial proposals for national legislation for reference.
In addition to the summary, the full text is divided into five parts and conclusions, and the summary is a brief introduction to the main points of view and the structure of the paper.
The first part is the introduction, which is the introduction of the research topics, the practical significance and theoretical significance of the research, the object and scope of the research, the train of thought and framework, the main contents of the research, the main research methods and possible innovations.
The second part, the definition of financial patents. Is the meaning and characteristics of the financial patent, patent financial implications and the introduction of the related concept, characteristics of financial patents, research and application status of financial patents, research status of domestic and foreign financial financial patent, patent in the financial industry in the description of the current situation is introduced and described.
The third part, the financial patent patentability (standard form) is analyzed. The financial patent patentability overview, introduces the general standard of financial patent, the patent authorization form of international financial standards, authorized financial patent in China in the form of standard introduction, beauty, analysis of Patent Standard trend of European financial patent our country can define the financial patent patentability standards, analysis of China's authorized financial patent case, China's current financial patent patentability standard analysis, China's future financial patent introduction and analysis of the optimal patent using standard recommendations.
The fourth part is a comparative study of the substantive examination standards of financial patents in the US, Japan, Europe and China. It is an introduction and comparative analysis of the substantive review standards for the financial patents of the United States, Japan and the European Union.
The fifth part, the suggestion of our financial patent review standard in the future, is the analysis of the necessity of establishing our financial patent review standard, and the suggestion for the establishment of our financial patent form standard and substantive standard in the future.
Conclusion: summarize the results of the full text and summarize the main points of view.

【學位授予單位】：華中科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.42;F832.2;G306

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黃丹華;;碩鼠何其多[J];金融博覽(財富);2011年06期

2 ;資訊[J];法人;2011年09期

3 中國人民銀行成都分行法律事務處課題組;陳育;;金融消費者概念之反思——基于一元化視角構建我國消費者金融權益保護制度[J];西南金融;2011年07期

4 ;以“三個結合”為主線開展創(chuàng)先爭優(yōu)活動[J];中國審計;2010年22期

5 張輝;;信息權助漲金融話語權[J];w，

本文編號：1715780