知識(shí)聯(lián)盟激勵(lì)協(xié)同的結(jié)構(gòu)模型研究
本文選題:知識(shí)聯(lián)盟 切入點(diǎn):網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu) 出處:《東北大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文
【摘要】:21世紀(jì),中國企業(yè)面臨經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化、組織模塊化和知識(shí)資本化的挑戰(zhàn),企業(yè)要在激烈的市場競爭中迅速提升學(xué)習(xí)和創(chuàng)新能力,與國內(nèi)外企業(yè)或組織組成知識(shí)聯(lián)盟迫在眉睫。知識(shí)聯(lián)盟的最終目的是在聯(lián)盟內(nèi)形成“1+12"的協(xié)同效應(yīng),但是由于企業(yè)內(nèi)部等各種原因,知識(shí)聯(lián)盟往往達(dá)不到其組建的目的,或者在聯(lián)盟運(yùn)行中期出現(xiàn)解體的狀況,因此要對(duì)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟進(jìn)行激勵(lì)設(shè)計(jì)。而知識(shí)聯(lián)盟的各知識(shí)主體是互相聯(lián)系的,牽一發(fā)而動(dòng)全身,所以要為聯(lián)盟中的知識(shí)主體共同制定激勵(lì)機(jī)制,通過知識(shí)交互、共享、融合和創(chuàng)造,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)知識(shí)創(chuàng)新,形成協(xié)同效應(yīng),即進(jìn)行知識(shí)聯(lián)盟激勵(lì)協(xié)同。聯(lián)盟的知識(shí)主體間形成了一種協(xié)同網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu),其本質(zhì)是一種社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò),因此可以運(yùn)用社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析法,對(duì)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟進(jìn)行分析,依據(jù)分析的結(jié)果找出聯(lián)盟在知識(shí)協(xié)同中存在的問題,進(jìn)行激勵(lì)協(xié)同。 本文分析了知識(shí)聯(lián)盟激勵(lì)協(xié)同的形成動(dòng)因,在此基礎(chǔ)上,根據(jù)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟理論、激勵(lì)理論、一般系統(tǒng)論和協(xié)同論及其相關(guān)理論,將知識(shí)聯(lián)盟的參與者知識(shí)主體視為行為主體,研究知識(shí)聯(lián)盟激勵(lì)協(xié)同的內(nèi)涵和外延,界定其基本概念,給出概念模型,綜合其基本特點(diǎn)。同時(shí),依據(jù)知識(shí)主體的不同,將知識(shí)聯(lián)盟分為企業(yè)——企業(yè)型、企業(yè)——科研機(jī)構(gòu)型和科研機(jī)構(gòu)之間的知識(shí)聯(lián)盟三類,根據(jù)生命周期理論分為醞釀、組建、運(yùn)行和解體四個(gè)階段,研究各類型及各階段知識(shí)主體的協(xié)作行為,綜合激勵(lì)特征,給出激勵(lì)協(xié)同的概念結(jié)構(gòu)模型。并以科研機(jī)構(gòu)之間的知識(shí)聯(lián)盟為例進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究。
[Abstract]:In the 21st century, Chinese enterprises are facing the challenges of economic globalization, organizational modularization and knowledge capitalization. It is urgent to form a knowledge alliance with domestic and foreign enterprises or organizations. The ultimate goal of the knowledge alliance is to form the synergy effect of "112" in the alliance. However, due to various reasons within the enterprise, the knowledge alliance is often unable to achieve the purpose of forming the knowledge alliance. Or if the alliance disintegrates in the middle of its operation, it is necessary to design incentives for the knowledge alliance. And the knowledge entities of the knowledge alliance are interrelated and move all over the body. So we should make the incentive mechanism for the knowledge subject in the alliance, through the knowledge interaction, sharing, fusion and creation, finally realize the knowledge innovation, form the synergy effect. That is to say, knowledge alliance motivates collaboration, and a collaborative network structure is formed among the knowledge subjects of the alliance, whose essence is a kind of social network, so we can use the social network analysis method to analyze the knowledge alliance. According to the results of the analysis, the problems of alliance in knowledge collaboration are found, and incentive collaboration is carried out. This paper analyzes the motivation of motivation and coordination of knowledge alliance. On this basis, according to the theory of knowledge alliance, incentive theory, general system theory, synergy theory and their related theories, the knowledge subject of knowledge alliance participants is regarded as the behavior subject. This paper studies the connotation and extension of incentive collaboration of knowledge alliance, defines its basic concept, gives a conceptual model and synthesizes its basic characteristics. At the same time, according to the difference of knowledge subject, knowledge alliance is divided into enterprise-enterprise type. There are three types of knowledge alliance between enterprise and scientific research institution. According to the theory of life cycle, they are divided into four stages: brewing, forming, running and disintegrating. The conceptual structure model of incentive collaboration is given, and the knowledge alliance among scientific research institutions is taken as an example.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:F272;G302
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 韓岫嵐;企業(yè)國際戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟的形成與發(fā)展[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年04期
2 付春;國際戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟與我國企業(yè)跨國經(jīng)營[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2001年02期
3 閆芬,陳國權(quán);實(shí)施大規(guī)模定制中組織知識(shí)共享研究[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期
4 芮明杰;陳曉靜;;公司隱性知識(shí)共享的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
5 夏若江;;組織設(shè)計(jì)的主動(dòng)性與合作性對(duì)企業(yè)知識(shí)共享行為的影響分析[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期
6 魏江 ,王艷;企業(yè)內(nèi)部知識(shí)共享模式研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2004年01期
7 林莉;知識(shí)聯(lián)盟中知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移的障礙因素及應(yīng)對(duì)策略分析[J];科技導(dǎo)報(bào);2004年04期
8 楊翩翩;劉益;侯吉?jiǎng)?;知識(shí)立方體模型及激勵(lì)工具的選擇[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2010年01期
9 藺豐奇;劉益;;知識(shí)聯(lián)盟的不穩(wěn)定性及對(duì)策分析[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2007年01期
10 顧新;李久平;王維成;;基于生命周期的知識(shí)鏈管理研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2007年03期
,本文編號(hào):1657621
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/keyanlw/1657621.html