本文選題：金融服務(wù) + 保管箱�。� 參考：《武漢金融》2012年11期

【摘要】：當(dāng)前商業(yè)銀行保管箱業(yè)務(wù)快速發(fā)展,已成為商業(yè)銀行中間業(yè)務(wù)收入的一個(gè)重要增長點(diǎn),但與此同時(shí)也引發(fā)了諸多法律糾紛,在一定程度上影響到了與客戶關(guān)系和銀行商譽(yù)。從我國現(xiàn)行法律來看,對(duì)保管箱業(yè)務(wù)未作明確界定,理論上對(duì)保管箱合同的法律性質(zhì)也甚有爭(zhēng)議,司法實(shí)踐中的判決也認(rèn)識(shí)不一。本文將以實(shí)踐中的相關(guān)判例為切入點(diǎn),結(jié)合法律相關(guān)規(guī)定和學(xué)理論證保管箱業(yè)務(wù)的法律性質(zhì),并提出完善合同、防范風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的有關(guān)措施。
[Abstract]:At present, the rapid development of the safekeeping box business of commercial banks has become an important growth point of intermediate business income of commercial banks, but at the same time, it has also caused many legal disputes, which to some extent has affected the relationship with customers and the goodwill of banks.From the point of view of the current law of our country, there is no clear definition of the business of the safekeeping box, and the legal nature of the contract of the safekeeping box is also very controversial in theory, and the judgment in the judicial practice is also different.This article will take the relevant case law in practice as the breakthrough point, unifies the law correlation stipulation and the study theory proof box business legal nature, and will propose the consummation contract, the guard against the risk related measure.
【作者單位】： 中國建設(shè)銀行湖北省分行;
【分類號(hào)】：D922.281;F832.2

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙江濤;;論我國監(jiān)護(hù)制度的立法完善[J];安陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

2 張瑞萍;從“代際公平”理論反思民事主體制度的價(jià)值[J];比較法研究;2003年05期

3 張麗英;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)法律性質(zhì)若干學(xué)說析[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

4 霍艷麗;淺論我國建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)中成員權(quán)的若干法律問題[J];長春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

5 余延滿,冉克平;繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

6 丁麗柏;王，

本文編號(hào)：1746841