南京市市級(jí)機(jī)關(guān)績(jī)效管理研究
[Abstract]:The report of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China calls for "innovating the way of administration, promoting government performance management, and promoting the scientific, standardized and institutionalized development of performance management". The government pays more and more attention to performance management. Government performance management is a new kind of administrative work, which is formed on the basis of drawing lessons from and absorbing the theory, practice and method of enterprise management performance. It is a comprehensive and systematic reform of administrative management system. It is also an important way to meet the new expectations of the people and improve the executive power and credibility of the government. This paper is based on the theory of key performance indicators, assisted by the balanced scorecard theory, combined with the advanced experience and practice of government performance management at home and abroad, to study the performance management of municipal authorities in Nanjing. At present, there are still some problems in the performance management of the municipal authorities in Nanjing, such as emphasizing the evaluation process, emphasizing the goal and the content, not recognizing the new concept of the performance management in thought, and the feedback utilization of the evaluation result is not enough, and so on. In view of this, this paper takes the problem as the direction, starts from the present situation of the performance management of the municipal authorities in Nanjing, through the literature research method, the comparative analysis method and the system analysis method and so on research means carries on the system analysis. This paper also analyzes and summarizes the practice of performance management at home and abroad, points out the development direction and optimization ways of performance management of municipal government in Nanjing, and puts forward some concrete innovative suggestions and practical suggestions combined with the actual operation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D630.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吳丹;馬常斌;;南寧市機(jī)關(guān)績(jī)效考評(píng)研究[J];中共南寧市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期
2 熊政;李賀軍;;國(guó)外政府績(jī)效考核概況[J];認(rèn)證技術(shù);2013年08期
3 王紅躍;陳彩琴;;進(jìn)一步推進(jìn)地方政府績(jī)效考核工作——以山西省年度目標(biāo)責(zé)任考核為例[J];中共山西省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期
4 張?chǎng)?;基于工作分析的公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核指標(biāo)體系研究——美國(guó)公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒[J];齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年05期
5 韓鋒;田家林;;戰(zhàn)略管理導(dǎo)向的政府績(jī)效管理特點(diǎn)、效能及應(yīng)用[J];技術(shù)與創(chuàng)新管理;2011年01期
6 陽(yáng)東辰;;中國(guó)公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核制度的現(xiàn)狀與改革對(duì)策[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期
7 韓鋒;誠(chéng)然;劉麗;;戰(zhàn)略管理框架下政府績(jī)效管理探析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2010年10期
8 石良仕;;政府績(jī)效考核困境及路徑選擇探討[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年05期
9 張亞偉;;政府組織績(jī)效管理的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境與途徑[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年06期
10 馬純龍;;英美地方政府績(jī)效管理的實(shí)踐及其借鑒[J];學(xué)理論;2009年27期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 陶冶;出入境檢驗(yàn)檢疫系統(tǒng)績(jī)效考核存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年
2 陳偉;地方政府績(jī)效考核工作研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2015年
3 陳亮;我國(guó)政府績(jī)效管理的現(xiàn)狀分析及優(yōu)化[D];山東師范大學(xué);2014年
4 梁作強(qiáng);我國(guó)政府績(jī)效評(píng)估現(xiàn)狀與體系構(gòu)建[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號(hào):2163308
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2163308.html