基于員工安全感知的煤礦安全文化評價方法研究
[Abstract]:Safety culture is an important part of the development of enterprise production and operation, and an important guarantee of enterprise production safety. In recent years, the research on safety culture of coal mining enterprises has gradually become a hot spot. However, according to the accident situation and investigation results of coal mine enterprises in recent years, the result of safety culture construction is not ideal. The problem of "landing difficulty" in safety culture has always existed. Through analysis and research, the reasons of "landing difficulty" in enterprise safety culture are obtained. Firstly, more attention has been paid to putting forward the concept of safety culture construction, and it has not been thoroughly and thoroughly implemented. The leadership has put forward some slogans on the construction of a safety culture for the staff, but it has not been implemented very well from the perspective of the staff, which has resulted in the staff not feeling the effectiveness of the construction of the safety culture in the enterprise; secondly, Although the enterprise has been carrying on the construction of safety culture, it lacks a set of systematic theoretical guidance system, and fails to form an effective measurement index. Based on the reason that safety culture is difficult to land, this paper puts forward the safety perception of employees. Domestic scholars mainly focus on tourists, customers and other groups, so this paper will start from the safety perception of employees in coal mining enterprises. Use the theory of perception for reference to further study the safety culture of coal mining enterprises. Firstly, the necessity of studying corporate safety culture from the perspective of safety perception is clarified, and the relationship model between employee safety perception, employee safety behavior and corporate safety culture is constructed by referring to the research theory of perception and feeling. Employee safety perception includes two dimensions: organizational environment and personal condition, employee safety behavior includes safety behavior intention and safety behavior, and safety culture includes safety performance. There are three dimensions of coal mine mortality rate per million tons and the importance of safety culture. The design of the questionnaire is based on each dimension of each aspect. The construction of the model lays a solid foundation for the follow-up study and can play a guiding role in the study of safety culture in coal mining enterprises. On the basis of the model, an evaluation index system of enterprise safety culture based on employee safety perception is constructed, which includes four first-level indicators, including organizational environment, personal condition, employee's individual behavior, safety concept culture, working environment and working atmosphere. Humane environment, education level, safety consciousness, emotion management, behavior habit, system execution, hidden trouble check, safety value, safety performance, leadership commitment, etc. On the choice of research methods, this paper selects the structural equation model suitable for multi-factor analysis, and based on the research of domestic and foreign investigation scale, compiles the questionnaire survey around the evaluation index system that has been constructed. Finally, 18 research questions were established, and the validity and reliability of the collected questionnaire were analyzed by SPSS data statistic software. The results showed that the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were acceptable, and the model was validated. Finally, the path coefficient map between reasonable safety perception and corporate safety culture is determined, and the hypothesis is verified. Finally, according to the questionnaire score and each path coefficient, The safety culture level of the investigated coal mine is evaluated, and the result shows that the safety culture condition of the coal mine needs to be improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西安科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:TD79
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬英;;構(gòu)建煤礦企業(yè)班組安全文化的思考[J];黑龍江科技信息;2017年11期
2 楊帆;;基于編碼樹法的煤礦事故分析[J];工礦自動化;2017年03期
3 苗雪;廖啟云;;基于整體性思維方式的意識形態(tài)特質(zhì)認(rèn)知[J];呂梁學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年04期
4 王秉;吳超;;安全標(biāo)語的文化作用機(jī)理研究[J];中國安全生產(chǎn)科學(xué)技術(shù);2016年01期
5 王秉;吳超;;安全文化建設(shè)原理研究[J];中國安全生產(chǎn)科學(xué)技術(shù);2015年12期
6 王秉;吳超;黃浪;;安全文化符號系統(tǒng)的建構(gòu)研究[J];中國安全科學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年12期
7 成連華;張良;任璐;;基于數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法的煤礦安全績效評價[J];煤礦安全;2015年11期
8 韓騰飛;;基于模糊綜合評價方法的煤炭企業(yè)安全狀況研究[J];機(jī)械管理開發(fā);2015年02期
9 景國勛;;2008—2013年我國煤礦瓦斯事故規(guī)律分析[J];安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報;2014年05期
10 熊家發(fā);張乃平;侯振堂;;AHP—模糊綜合評價法在煤礦安全文化評價中的應(yīng)用[J];中州煤炭;2014年08期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 馬立杰;DEA理論及應(yīng)用研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 趙娜;煤礦安全事故人因失信分析與分類系統(tǒng)研究[D];太原科技大學(xué);2014年
2 何小訪;基于安全感知理論的管理應(yīng)用模式研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2014年
3 張翠;基于顧客感知視角的酒店安全評價研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2013年
4 劉文娟;基于360°的煤礦安全文化模糊綜合評價研究[D];安徽理工大學(xué);2011年
5 蘇松;電力企業(yè)員工安全認(rèn)知能力研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2010年
6 王翠娟;煤礦安全文化評價體系研究[D];安徽理工大學(xué);2009年
7 周蓉;企業(yè)安全事故風(fēng)險預(yù)警體系研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2008年
8 汪勇;從文化的屬性研究企業(yè)安全文化建設(shè)[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2008年
9 宋曉燕;企業(yè)安全文化評價指標(biāo)體系研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年
10 藍(lán)榮香;安全氛圍對安全行為的影響及安全氛圍調(diào)查軟件的開發(fā)[D];清華大學(xué);2004年
,本文編號:2126613
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2126613.html