本文選題：多元化經(jīng)營(yíng) + 多元化動(dòng)因　； 參考：《廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著國(guó)家出臺(tái)的宏觀政策對(duì)房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)的具體調(diào)控,房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)的發(fā)展一波三折,市場(chǎng)形勢(shì)和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)格局發(fā)生根本性變革,促使我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)通過(guò)多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)尋求逆勢(shì)突破,彎道超車,實(shí)現(xiàn)企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的增長(zhǎng)以及企業(yè)的增值。但是,這種跨界的多元化經(jīng)營(yíng),是否真能如企業(yè)初愿,實(shí)現(xiàn)企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)呢?筆者通過(guò)閱讀大量的文獻(xiàn)和資料,發(fā)現(xiàn)目前針對(duì)多元化的財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效研究主要集中在大樣本的實(shí)證研究,由于大樣本實(shí)證研究的宏觀性,對(duì)具體案例的深層次問(wèn)題缺乏深入的分析。因此,本文突破以往的研究形式,采用案例研究的方法對(duì)這一問(wèn)題進(jìn)行深入探討,結(jié)合規(guī)范研究和對(duì)比研究法為案例企業(yè)找出在多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,并分析多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)對(duì)企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的影響,以期從案例研究中挖掘有價(jià)值的信息,為內(nèi)地房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)的做大做強(qiáng)提供參考。本文首先對(duì)多元化和財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的理論基礎(chǔ)以及多元化的財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了梳理和總結(jié),其次對(duì)H集團(tuán)的基本情況和多元化背景,以及集團(tuán)目前的財(cái)務(wù)狀況進(jìn)行了介紹。然后從財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)以及企業(yè)價(jià)值兩個(gè)角度分析了案例公司的財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效,揭示出集團(tuán)實(shí)施多元化之后,財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效各指標(biāo)有不同程度的下降。同時(shí)運(yùn)用對(duì)比分析法對(duì)H集團(tuán)和W公司的盈利能力、營(yíng)運(yùn)能力和成長(zhǎng)性等指標(biāo)進(jìn)行比較分析。通過(guò)比較H集團(tuán)和W公司的盈利能力的差別,發(fā)現(xiàn)H集團(tuán)比W公司凈資產(chǎn)收益率略高的原因在于負(fù)債率過(guò)高。多元化業(yè)務(wù)對(duì)H集團(tuán)的負(fù)貢獻(xiàn)拉低了集團(tuán)整體的凈資產(chǎn)收益率,同時(shí)運(yùn)用連環(huán)替代法分析得出集團(tuán)營(yíng)收的增長(zhǎng)與資產(chǎn)的增加不匹配,從而導(dǎo)致H集團(tuán)的總資產(chǎn)報(bào)酬率降低。通過(guò)對(duì)比分析H集團(tuán)和W公司的成長(zhǎng)能力,拆解估算得出H集團(tuán)非地產(chǎn)業(yè)務(wù)對(duì)集團(tuán)凈利潤(rùn)的影響為負(fù)。通過(guò)對(duì)比H集團(tuán)與W公司的營(yíng)運(yùn)能力,發(fā)現(xiàn)多元化業(yè)務(wù)對(duì)關(guān)聯(lián)方的依賴會(huì)降低集團(tuán)的應(yīng)收賬款周轉(zhuǎn)率,從而影響房地產(chǎn)業(yè)務(wù)的現(xiàn)金流。綜上所述,本文認(rèn)為H集團(tuán)的非相關(guān)多元化業(yè)務(wù)對(duì)集團(tuán)的財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效有負(fù)面影響。同時(shí)提出如下建議:企業(yè)發(fā)展多元化業(yè)務(wù),除了發(fā)揮企業(yè)的資源優(yōu)勢(shì),還要兼顧各業(yè)務(wù)的協(xié)同效應(yīng);另外多元化必須穩(wěn)定現(xiàn)金流,不能造成對(duì)主業(yè)健康發(fā)展的阻礙。本文的研究可以為其他房地產(chǎn)公司發(fā)展多元化戰(zhàn)略提供參考,對(duì)促進(jìn)房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的健康發(fā)展亦有一定的積極意義。
[Abstract]:With the specific regulation and control of the real estate industry, the development of the real estate industry and the fundamental changes in the market situation and the competition pattern have prompted our real estate enterprises to seek a breakthrough in the reverse trend through diversified management. Bend overtaking, to achieve the growth of corporate financial performance and corporate value-added. However, this kind of cross-border diversification, can the enterprise achieve the financial performance of the sustained growth? By reading a large number of documents and materials, the author finds that the current financial performance research focused on the large sample of empirical research, because of the macro of the large sample empirical research. Lack of in-depth analysis of the deep-seated problems of specific cases. Therefore, this article breaks through the previous research form, uses the case study method to carry on the thorough discussion to this question, unifies the standard research and the contrast research method to find out the question which appears in the diversification process for the case enterprise. It also analyzes the influence of diversification on the financial performance of enterprises in order to excavate valuable information from the case study and provide a reference for the mainland real estate enterprises to become bigger and stronger. In this paper, the theoretical basis of diversification and financial performance, as well as the related literature on diversification of financial performance are reviewed and summarized. Secondly, the basic situation and diversified background of H Group and the current financial situation of H Group are introduced. Then the financial performance of the case company is analyzed from two angles of financial index and enterprise value, and it is revealed that after the diversification of the group, the financial performance of each index has different degrees of decline. At the same time, comparative analysis is made on the profitability, operation ability and growth of H Group and W Company. By comparing the difference of profitability between H Group and W Company, it is found that the reason why H Group is slightly higher than W company is that the debt ratio is too high. The negative contribution of diversified business to H Group lowers the overall net asset return rate of H Group. Meanwhile, by using the method of serial substitution, it is concluded that the revenue growth of H Group does not match the increase of assets, which leads to a lower return on total assets of H Group. By comparing and analyzing the growth ability of H Group and W Company, it is concluded that the influence of Group H's non-real estate business on the group's net profit is negative. By comparing the operating ability of H Group and W Company, it is found that the dependence of diversified business on related parties will reduce the turnover of accounts receivable of the Group, thus affecting the cash flow of real estate business. To sum up, this paper argues that H Group's non-related diversified business has a negative impact on its financial performance. At the same time, the following suggestions are put forward: apart from giving full play to the resource advantages of the enterprise, the diversified business should take into account the synergy effect of the various businesses; in addition, diversification must stabilize the cash flow and cannot cause obstacles to the healthy development of the main business. The research in this paper can provide a reference for other real estate companies to develop diversification strategy, and also has certain positive significance to promote the healthy development of real estate industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F275;F279.26

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高麗;盧姍;;新常態(tài)背景下企業(yè)集團(tuán)國(guó)際化、多元化戰(zhàn)略選擇與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2016年18期

2 劉思婧;馬駿;李國(guó)旗;;物流業(yè)務(wù)經(jīng)營(yíng)多元化與企業(yè)績(jī)效——基于2003-2012年中國(guó)物流上市公司的數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2015年02期

3 胡挺;沈文華;;整體上市、多元化戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)型與經(jīng)濟(jì)后果——以廣州日?qǐng)?bào)報(bào)業(yè)集團(tuán)為例[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2015年09期

4 諶靜;;旅游上市公司多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)與績(jī)效關(guān)系實(shí)證研究——基于內(nèi)部財(cái)務(wù)和外部市場(chǎng)價(jià)值視角[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2014年21期

5 梁博;;多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)與企業(yè)績(jī)效——基于代理成本的分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2013年09期

6 趙鳳;王鐵男;張良;;多元化戰(zhàn)略對(duì)企業(yè)績(jī)效影響的實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)軟科學(xué);2012年11期

7 李琳;趙進(jìn);;上市公司非相關(guān)多元化與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系研究——以建筑行業(yè)為例[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友;2012年26期

8 鄧洪林;;多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)對(duì)公司績(jī)效的影響研究[J];北京市經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

9 胡茂莉;;企業(yè)多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)戰(zhàn)略研究綜述[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2011年36期

10 宋谷予;;多元化折價(jià)與多元化溢價(jià)的穩(wěn)健性:一個(gè)文獻(xiàn)述評(píng)[J];科學(xué)決策;2011年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張?zhí)m;公司治理、多元化戰(zhàn)略與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的關(guān)系[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

2 李雪峰;多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)與公司績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

3 李國(guó)良;中國(guó)建筑企業(yè)多元化與績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 韓福陽(yáng);聯(lián)想集團(tuán)多元化戰(zhàn)略動(dòng)因及績(jī)效分析[D];華東理工大學(xué);2016年

2 姜鑫;我國(guó)建筑業(yè)上市公司多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的實(shí)證研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2014年

3 倪震;我國(guó)中小板上市公司多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效、成長(zhǎng)性關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

4 李向;多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)對(duì)公司財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的影響[D];浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

5 劉楠;企業(yè)多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)的財(cái)務(wù)效應(yīng)分析[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年

6 趙進(jìn);建筑企業(yè)多元化經(jīng)營(yíng)與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2013年

7 梁悠;上市公司產(chǎn)業(yè)多元化戰(zhàn)略與公司績(jī)效的相關(guān)性研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

8 劉佳綺;多元化與企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2010576