本文選題：集中連片特困地區(qū) + 扶貧模式��； 參考：《河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著改革開放的深入及經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展,人類的生活水平不斷提升,但貧困人口、貧困地區(qū)依然存在,貧困地區(qū)特別是集中連片特困地區(qū)發(fā)展相對(duì)滯后,嚴(yán)重制約著我國(guó)全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)基本目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。在我國(guó)很多扶貧模式已被廣泛推行,但扶貧績(jī)效卻普遍存在著效率低下、效率遞減等問題。本文運(yùn)用定量分析方法構(gòu)建績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系,希望為我國(guó)的集中連片特困地區(qū)扶貧工作提供理論依據(jù)和指導(dǎo),提供更實(shí)際可行的方案。本文以信陽(yáng)市集中連片特困地區(qū)為研究對(duì)象,梳理了信陽(yáng)市近年來在扶貧開發(fā)過程中主要采取的扶貧政策和項(xiàng)目。以光山縣為例,結(jié)合信陽(yáng)市2011-2015年扶貧開發(fā)規(guī)劃目標(biāo)的完成情況,通過問卷調(diào)查和實(shí)地調(diào)研等方式,對(duì)信陽(yáng)市集中連片特困地區(qū)進(jìn)行扶貧模式績(jī)效評(píng)估,找出信陽(yáng)市扶貧工作中存在的問題,探討引發(fā)這些問題的原因。最后,提出相應(yīng)的提高信陽(yáng)市扶貧績(jī)效的政策建議。本文從經(jīng)濟(jì)效果、社會(huì)效果和生態(tài)壞境效果三個(gè)方面對(duì)扶貧績(jī)效進(jìn)行全面的考核,運(yùn)用定量分析法進(jìn)行扶貧模式的績(jī)效評(píng)估,可以為政府的扶貧工作提供及時(shí)的反饋信息,以便及時(shí)調(diào)整扶貧策略以達(dá)到最佳的扶貧績(jī)效,把扶貧資金用于基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)、生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù),不僅有利于完善后續(xù)的扶貧模式實(shí)施工作,還對(duì)于提高貧困人口反貧困能力、提高扶貧策略的可持續(xù)效果有著巨大的推動(dòng)、促進(jìn)作用。研究扶貧開發(fā)是一項(xiàng)系統(tǒng)工程,其涵蓋面非常廣,由于時(shí)間和數(shù)據(jù)可得性的影響,本文未能將信陽(yáng)市扶貧開發(fā)過程中所主要推行的政策和項(xiàng)目進(jìn)行單獨(dú)評(píng)估。對(duì)具體的每一個(gè)扶貧政策和項(xiàng)目進(jìn)行績(jī)效評(píng)估,也是筆者今后的努力方向之一。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening up and the development of economic globalization, the standard of living of human beings has been continuously improved. However, the poor population and poor areas still exist, and the development of poor areas, especially those with concentrated special difficulties, has lagged behind. It seriously restricts the realization of the basic goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way in our country. In China, many poverty alleviation models have been widely implemented, but there are many problems in poverty alleviation performance, such as low efficiency and decreasing efficiency. In this paper, the quantitative analysis method is used to construct the performance evaluation system, hoping to provide theoretical basis and guidance for the work of poverty alleviation in the concentrated poverty relief areas in China, and to provide more practical and feasible schemes. This paper takes Xinyang City as the research object, combs the poverty alleviation policy and the project which the Xinyang city mainly adopts in the process of poverty alleviation and development in recent years. Taking Guangshan County as an example, combining with the completion of the poverty alleviation and development planning target of Xinyang City in 2011-2015, through questionnaire investigation and field investigation, the paper evaluates the performance of poverty alleviation model in the concentrated and connected areas of Xinyang City. To find out the existing problems in the work of poverty alleviation in Xinyang City, and to explore the causes of these problems. Finally, the paper puts forward the corresponding policy recommendations to improve the performance of poverty alleviation in Xinyang City. This paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of poverty alleviation performance from three aspects: economic effect, social effect and ecological environment effect, and applies quantitative analysis method to evaluate the performance of poverty alleviation model, which can provide timely feedback information for the government's poverty alleviation work. In order to adjust poverty alleviation strategies in time to achieve the best poverty alleviation performance, and to use poverty alleviation funds for infrastructure construction and ecological environment protection, it is not only conducive to improving the implementation of the poverty alleviation model in the future, but also to improving the anti-poverty ability of the poor population. Improving the sustainable effect of poverty reduction strategy has a huge impetus and promoting role. The research on poverty alleviation and development is a systematic project, which covers a wide range of areas. Due to the influence of time and data availability, this paper fails to evaluate the policies and projects mainly carried out in the process of poverty alleviation and development in Xinyang City. It is also one of the directions for the author to evaluate the performance of each poverty alleviation policy and project.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F323.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉宇翔;;連片貧困地區(qū)農(nóng)民合作扶貧模式研究[J];湖南財(cái)政經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年06期

2 何得桂;黨國(guó)英;;西部山區(qū)易地扶貧搬遷政策執(zhí)行偏差研究——基于陜南的實(shí)地調(diào)查[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年06期

3 邢慧斌;;國(guó)內(nèi)旅游扶貧績(jī)效評(píng)估研究述評(píng)[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年33期

4 陳友蓮;向延平;;我國(guó)農(nóng)村精準(zhǔn)扶貧分析:基于湘西州的經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];市場(chǎng)論壇;2015年11期

5 徐孝勇;姜寒;寸家菊;;我國(guó)扶貧工作重點(diǎn)縣三次產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的扶貧績(jī)效分析[J];市場(chǎng)論壇;2015年10期

6 尉詠梅;;探究財(cái)政扶貧資金績(jī)效審計(jì)工作現(xiàn)狀及改進(jìn)措施[J];財(cái)經(jīng)界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2015年18期

7 劉宇翔;;欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)農(nóng)民合作扶貧模式研究[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2015年07期

8 陳菁;賀達(dá)水;;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與農(nóng)村扶貧績(jī)效的區(qū)域差異[J];中國(guó)延安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

9 ;安徽:全面推進(jìn)財(cái)政支農(nóng)資金管理改革[J];山東經(jīng)濟(jì)戰(zhàn)略研究;2015年05期

10 陳小麗;;基于多層次分析法的湖北民族地區(qū)扶貧績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 孫璐;扶貧項(xiàng)目績(jī)效評(píng)估研究[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 張曦;連片特困地區(qū)參與式扶貧績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1877729