本文選題：國(guó)際化程度 + 企業(yè)績(jī)效�。� 參考：《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力的不斷增強(qiáng)和"走出去"戰(zhàn)略的推進(jìn),越來越多的企業(yè)開展國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)。尤其是"一帶一路"戰(zhàn)略的提出,更是給我國(guó)企業(yè)開展國(guó)際化帶來了重大機(jī)遇。在當(dāng)前的發(fā)展中,國(guó)企仍是我國(guó)企業(yè)國(guó)際化的主力軍,而民企通過不斷引進(jìn)國(guó)外的技術(shù)、人才、管理經(jīng)驗(yàn)等,也取得了飛速發(fā)展。但在具體的國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)上,國(guó)企與民企呈現(xiàn)了不同的特點(diǎn),因而對(duì)企業(yè)績(jī)效的影響也有所不同。如何把握這不同并進(jìn)行合理的國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng),以方便國(guó)企與民企更好地參與國(guó)際分工、提高國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)能力已成為一個(gè)重要的課題。本文基于國(guó)企與民企的分類,綜合考慮國(guó)際化程度與企業(yè)績(jī)效關(guān)系,將企業(yè)規(guī)模、企業(yè)資產(chǎn)負(fù)債率、企業(yè)年齡作為控制變量,利用我國(guó)制造業(yè)上市公司2011-2015年數(shù)據(jù),采取理論研究和實(shí)證分析相結(jié)合的方法,對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)企與民企國(guó)際化程度與企業(yè)績(jī)效進(jìn)行對(duì)比研究,并結(jié)合研究結(jié)果給出相關(guān)建議。本文研究主要得出以下結(jié)論:(1)我國(guó)國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)由早期的國(guó)企主導(dǎo)模式逐漸演變?yōu)閲?guó)企和民企并駕齊驅(qū)的態(tài)勢(shì)。但國(guó)企和民企因?yàn)楦髯圆煌膬?nèi)外部因素影響,在國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)上呈現(xiàn)不同的發(fā)展特點(diǎn),這導(dǎo)致兩類企業(yè)在國(guó)際化發(fā)展上存在一定的差異。(2)企業(yè)開展國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)會(huì)影響企業(yè)績(jī)效,但關(guān)系曲線有所不同。具體表現(xiàn)為國(guó)企國(guó)際化程度與企業(yè)績(jī)效之間呈現(xiàn)水平S形關(guān)系,分別在國(guó)際化程度為16.77%和45.74%時(shí),存在極值;而民企國(guó)際化程度與企業(yè)績(jī)效之間呈現(xiàn)倒U形關(guān)系,在國(guó)際化程度為45.70%時(shí),存在最大值。(3)企業(yè)規(guī)模、資產(chǎn)負(fù)債率對(duì)于國(guó)企與民企開展國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)具有一定的影響。具體表現(xiàn)在無論國(guó)企還是民企企業(yè)規(guī)模與企業(yè)績(jī)效之間呈現(xiàn)較為微弱的負(fù)相關(guān);國(guó)企國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效與資產(chǎn)負(fù)債率呈現(xiàn)顯著負(fù)相關(guān),而民企國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效與資產(chǎn)負(fù)債率呈現(xiàn)顯著正相關(guān)。(4)結(jié)合研究結(jié)果,本文從技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,品牌建設(shè),國(guó)民兩企取長(zhǎng)補(bǔ)短、合作共贏以及政府方面給出建議,為中國(guó)企業(yè)更好的進(jìn)行國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)提供參考和指導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:With the increasing of our country's economic strength and the promotion of "going out" strategy, more and more enterprises carry out international operation. In particular, Belt and Road's strategy has brought great opportunities for Chinese enterprises to internationalize. In the current development, the state-owned enterprises are still the main force in the internationalization of Chinese enterprises, and private enterprises have also made rapid development through the introduction of foreign technology, talent, management experience and so on. However, in the specific international operation, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises show different characteristics, so the impact on enterprise performance is also different. How to grasp this difference and carry on reasonable international management, in order to facilitate the state-owned enterprises and private enterprises to participate in the international division of labor better, improve the ability of international management has become an important issue. Based on the classification of state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, considering the relationship between the degree of internationalization and the performance of enterprises, this paper takes the scale of enterprises, the ratio of assets and liabilities of enterprises, the age of enterprises as control variables, and makes use of the data of listed manufacturing companies in China from 2011 to 2015. By combining theoretical research with empirical analysis, this paper makes a comparative study on the degree of internationalization and performance of state-owned and private enterprises in China, and gives some suggestions on the basis of the results of the study. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) China's international operation has gradually evolved from the early mode of leading state-owned enterprises to a situation in which state-owned enterprises and private enterprises are neck and neck. However, due to different internal and external factors, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises have different development characteristics in international operation, which leads to some differences between the two types of enterprises in the development of internationalization. But the relationship curve is different. It shows that there is a horizontal S shape relationship between the degree of internationalization of the state-owned enterprises and the performance of the enterprises. When the degree of internationalization is 16.77% and the degree of internationalization is 45.74%, there is an extreme value, while the relationship between the degree of internationalization of the private enterprises and the performance of the enterprises is inversely U-shaped. When the degree of internationalization is 45.70, there is a maximum value of enterprise size, and the ratio of assets and liabilities has a certain influence on the internationalization of state-owned enterprises and private enterprises. There is a weak negative correlation between the scale of state-owned enterprises or private enterprises and enterprise performance, and a significant negative correlation between the performance of state-owned enterprises and the ratio of assets and liabilities. However, there is a significant positive correlation between the performance of international operation of private enterprises and the ratio of assets and liabilities. (4) combined with the research results, this paper gives some suggestions from the aspects of technological innovation, brand building, national enterprises to learn from each other, win-win cooperation and the government. For Chinese enterprises to better carry out international operations to provide reference and guidance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F425;F272.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 盛思鑫;曹文煉;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資情況的再評(píng)估[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年04期

2 許可;王瑛;;中國(guó)國(guó)有企業(yè)與私營(yíng)企業(yè)國(guó)際化戰(zhàn)略對(duì)比研究——基于負(fù)二項(xiàng)分布模型的實(shí)證分析[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年09期

3 鄧新明;熊會(huì)兵;李劍峰;侯俊東;吳錦峰;;政治關(guān)聯(lián)、國(guó)際化戰(zhàn)略與企業(yè)價(jià)值——來自中國(guó)民營(yíng)上市公司面板數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];南開管理評(píng)論;2014年01期

4 潘悅;;推進(jìn)中國(guó)國(guó)際投資合作的新思考[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2013年06期

5 ;State-owned Enterprises' Outward Investment and the Structural Reform in China[J];China & World Economy;2011年04期

6 宋淵洋;李元旭;王宇露;;企業(yè)資源、所有權(quán)性質(zhì)與國(guó)際化程度——來自中國(guó)制造業(yè)上市公司的證據(jù)[J];管理評(píng)論;2011年02期

7 李媛;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)出口貿(mào)易的促進(jìn)[J];中共太原市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

8 曲琳琳;林山;;當(dāng)前中央企業(yè)金融衍生品投資現(xiàn)狀、問題及建議[J];財(cái)政研究;2009年08期

9 肖文;陳益君;林高榜;;中國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)國(guó)際化的績(jī)效分析——基于江浙地區(qū)民營(yíng)企業(yè)的問卷調(diào)查[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2009年02期

10 楊忠;張驍;;企業(yè)國(guó)際化程度與績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 鄒俊;中央企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略重組及其國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力提升研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

2 張祥;我國(guó)企業(yè)國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)及其績(jī)效研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

3 姜華欣;中國(guó)國(guó)有企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

4 高薇;國(guó)際直接投資理論的演變及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 蘭瀟驍;心理距離對(duì)中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資區(qū)位選擇的影響研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2016年

2 張曉天;從溫州對(duì)外直接投資看民營(yíng)企業(yè)國(guó)際化問題[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2014年

3 金肖穎;企業(yè)國(guó)際化經(jīng)營(yíng)、社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效和財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

4 李和新;中國(guó)企業(yè)國(guó)際化戰(zhàn)略與經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2013年

5 馮秀臣;我國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)國(guó)際化發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2012年

6 翁冉冉;國(guó)有企業(yè)與民營(yíng)企業(yè)FDI政治風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D];湖北工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

7 韓偉偉;中國(guó)企業(yè)國(guó)際化與經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

8 襲著超;我國(guó)上市民營(yíng)企業(yè)國(guó)際化與企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)實(shí)證研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

9 胡莎;企業(yè)國(guó)際化對(duì)經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效的影響[D];中南大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1792976