本文選題：工程擔(dān)保行業(yè) + 平衡計(jì)分卡��； 參考：《重慶理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系是企業(yè)績(jī)效管理的核心內(nèi)容,績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系的合理與否,不僅關(guān)系到企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)的達(dá)成,也影響著企業(yè)管理層及員工的積極性。然而,出于各種原因,績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)在我國(guó)中小企業(yè)中并未得到廣泛而深入的應(yīng)用,尤其表現(xiàn)在績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系的設(shè)置有明顯的主觀性、隨意性、片面性。而在“工程擔(dān)�！边@個(gè)新興而特殊的行業(yè)中,績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)與非財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)都明顯不同于制造與流通行業(yè),目前普遍缺乏切合擔(dān)保業(yè)務(wù)特征的績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系�！捌胶庥�(jì)分卡”因其具有戰(zhàn)略導(dǎo)向性、內(nèi)外平衡性、長(zhǎng)短期互補(bǔ)性等特點(diǎn),是當(dāng)前管理會(huì)計(jì)中備受推崇的績(jī)效管理工具,本文擬探討“平衡計(jì)分卡”在一個(gè)工程擔(dān)保公司績(jī)效考核體系中的應(yīng)用問(wèn)題,為該公司提供績(jī)效考核優(yōu)化建議,期望對(duì)同類(lèi)公司的績(jī)效管理也有普適性參考價(jià)值。本文選取的案例公司是深圳市H工程擔(dān)保公司。首先,對(duì)該公司實(shí)行關(guān)鍵業(yè)績(jī)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行績(jī)效管理的情況進(jìn)行了調(diào)查分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)了存在的問(wèn)題以及形成問(wèn)題的原因。其次,針對(duì)存在的問(wèn)題,結(jié)合H公司現(xiàn)在的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)、運(yùn)用平衡計(jì)分卡工具,對(duì)發(fā)現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行原因分析。再次,結(jié)合該公司的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),從擔(dān)保行業(yè)市場(chǎng)環(huán)境、H公司的市場(chǎng)定位等方面分析了績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的目標(biāo),利用專(zhuān)家調(diào)查問(wèn)卷結(jié)果對(duì)公司現(xiàn)有的績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行修正完善,并引入層次分析法對(duì)指標(biāo)權(quán)重科學(xué)設(shè)置,對(duì)績(jī)效考核反饋機(jī)制進(jìn)行完善,對(duì)績(jī)效考核預(yù)期效果進(jìn)行分析,這也是本文的重心所在。最后,從績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的各個(gè)方面為H公司提出相關(guān)建議,并意欲把績(jī)效評(píng)估與薪酬改制結(jié)合起來(lái),促進(jìn)公司管理層盡心盡責(zé),確保企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略績(jī)效目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。本文的調(diào)查與研究,可以得出以下幾點(diǎn)結(jié)論:首先,平衡計(jì)分卡可以有效地幫助擔(dān)保企業(yè)將戰(zhàn)略績(jī)效轉(zhuǎn)化為可操作的績(jī)效指標(biāo)體系,并自上而下地為公司員工所理解和接受。其次,完善后的基于平衡計(jì)分卡進(jìn)行公司績(jī)效考核在提升H公司短期經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效的同時(shí)有利于公司的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展。最后,績(jī)效考核體系必須有良好的反饋機(jī)制并與獎(jiǎng)懲、薪酬、晉升制度相配合才會(huì)整體有效。
[Abstract]:Performance evaluation system is the core content of enterprise performance management. Whether the performance evaluation system is reasonable or not is not only related to the achievement of strategic objectives, but also affects the enthusiasm of management and staff.However, for various reasons, performance evaluation has not been widely and deeply applied in the small and medium-sized enterprises of our country, especially in the setting of performance evaluation system has obvious subjectivity, randomness, one-sidedness.In the new and special industry of "engineering guarantee", the financial index and non-financial index of performance evaluation are obviously different from that of manufacturing and circulation industry, and there is a general lack of performance evaluation system suitable for the characteristics of guarantee business at present."balanced Scorecard" is a highly respected performance management tool in current management accounting because of its characteristics of strategic orientation, internal and external balance, long-term and short-term complementarity, etc.This paper discusses the application of "balanced Scorecard" in the performance appraisal system of a project guarantee company, and provides the company with suggestions for the optimization of performance appraisal. It is expected that it will also be of universal reference value to the performance management of similar companies.The case company selected in this paper is Shenzhen H Engineering guarantee Company.Firstly, the paper investigates and analyzes the performance management of key performance indicators, and finds out the existing problems and the causes of the problems.Secondly, according to the existing problems, combined with H company's current strategic objectives, using the balanced scorecard tool, the causes of the problems are analyzed.Thirdly, combined with the company's practical experience, this paper analyzes the objectives of performance evaluation from the market positioning of the guarantee industry market environment, and makes use of the results of the expert questionnaire to revise and perfect the existing performance index system of the company.And the introduction of AHP to the index weight scientific setting, performance appraisal feedback mechanism to improve the performance appraisal of the expected effect of analysis, this is the focus of this paper.Finally, from the performance evaluation of the various aspects of H company put forward relevant recommendations, and intends to combine performance evaluation with compensation reform, to promote the company management dedication to ensure the realization of corporate strategic performance goals.The investigation and research in this paper can draw the following conclusions: first, balanced scorecard can effectively help guarantee enterprises to transform strategic performance into an operational performance index system, and be understood and accepted by employees from top to bottom.Secondly, the performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard is beneficial to the long-term development of H company.Finally, the performance appraisal system must have the good feedback mechanism and the reward and punishment, the salary, the promotion system will be effective as a whole.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F832.39;F830.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李良;;平衡計(jì)分卡和經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值在企業(yè)績(jī)效考核中的運(yùn)用——以M集團(tuán)為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2016年01期

2 賀燕;揚(yáng)東花;;結(jié)合EVA和BSC的發(fā)電企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)[J];中國(guó)電業(yè)(技術(shù)版);2015年01期

3 朱林;;基于BSC與EVA結(jié)合的企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2014年35期

4 王仲丘;;我國(guó)目前階段的工程擔(dān)保模式選擇[J];中國(guó)管理信息化;2014年05期

5 羅云;楊芳;范瑞娜;尹學(xué)軍;管堅(jiān);李順榮;李偉忠;;特種設(shè)備檢驗(yàn)機(jī)構(gòu)BSC績(jī)效模型及要素分析[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2014年02期

6 劉靜;;探析我國(guó)工程擔(dān)保制度[J];中外企業(yè)家;2014年04期

7 李娟娟;;華潤(rùn)集團(tuán)平衡計(jì)分卡應(yīng)用研究[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2014年01期

8 厲杰;;平衡計(jì)分卡理論研究綜述[J];人力資源管理;2013年10期

9 楊松令;常曉紅;劉亭立;;高新技術(shù)企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究——以中國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司為例[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2013年07期

10 譚寧;;基于公司價(jià)值最大化的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)體系構(gòu)建——EVA與BSC的集成研究[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2013年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 周波;以深圳市A公司為對(duì)象的基于平衡計(jì)分卡的我國(guó)投資擔(dān)保公司的績(jī)效管理研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2014年

2 李楠;DH郵政系統(tǒng)金融項(xiàng)目營(yíng)銷(xiāo)人員績(jī)效管理方案設(shè)計(jì)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

3 厲杰;基于BSC的XA研究院技術(shù)工程類(lèi)業(yè)務(wù)單元績(jī)效管理優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì)[D];西北大學(xué);2013年

4 潘偉;基于TOPSIS法的政府投資項(xiàng)目代建制實(shí)施績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];北京建筑大學(xué);2013年

5 李志國(guó);建筑工程擔(dān)保風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)警機(jī)制研究[D];山東科技大學(xué);2011年

6 廖強(qiáng);中建擔(dān)保有限公司戰(zhàn)略分析與制定[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

7 林紅;平衡計(jì)分卡在擔(dān)保企業(yè)的應(yīng)用研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2005年

8 付英軍;中小企業(yè)金融支持[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2004年

9 劉豐收;平衡計(jì)分卡在企業(yè)績(jī)效管理中的應(yīng)用[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1754274