本文關(guān)鍵詞： “三社” 三社聯(lián)動(dòng) 社區(qū)治理　出處：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中共十八屆三中全會(huì)提出推進(jìn)我國(guó)國(guó)家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化的目標(biāo),并把推進(jìn)社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新作為重點(diǎn),而推進(jìn)社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新需要以轉(zhuǎn)變社區(qū)治理方式為切入點(diǎn)。但是,如何調(diào)動(dòng)目前社區(qū)內(nèi)閑置資源,實(shí)現(xiàn)資源之間有效鏈接,形成多元共治的局面成為我國(guó)社區(qū)基層治理方式轉(zhuǎn)變最緊迫的任務(wù)。居委會(huì)、社會(huì)組織和社工作為社區(qū)治理的主體,他們各自承擔(dān)著不同的角色與義務(wù)。社區(qū)基層治理的深化推進(jìn)需要從這些主體入手,不斷探索和實(shí)踐,形成一種能夠有效對(duì)接政府和居民的機(jī)制,從而形成政府與社會(huì)之間互聯(lián)、互通、互補(bǔ)的社會(huì)治理新格局,達(dá)到一種動(dòng)態(tài)的平衡。目前,在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)開展的“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”將居委會(huì)、社會(huì)組織和社工很好的協(xié)調(diào)在一起,促使三者實(shí)現(xiàn)功能的有效互補(bǔ),并形成不斷持久運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的動(dòng)力,成為推動(dòng)基層社區(qū)治理逐漸深化的有效機(jī)制。然而,“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”在具體落地過(guò)程中,面臨著種種困境。因此,對(duì)“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”進(jìn)行深入分析,探析其良性運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的制約因素與推進(jìn)策略顯得尤為必要。論文從概念界定和理論闡述入手,對(duì)“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”進(jìn)行理論層面的研討,剖析“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”的學(xué)理基礎(chǔ)。同時(shí),論文對(duì)“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”良性運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)中的角色定位和多方聯(lián)動(dòng)進(jìn)行分析。根據(jù)國(guó)內(nèi)實(shí)際,大致將“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”細(xì)分為政府主導(dǎo)型、項(xiàng)目指導(dǎo)型及社工引領(lǐng)型,并對(duì)目前典型的地方城市進(jìn)行深入分析。對(duì)于制約“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”良性運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的主要因素分別提出對(duì)應(yīng)策略。即通過(guò)理清“三社”各自職能邊界,發(fā)揮“三社”各自優(yōu)勢(shì)進(jìn)而促使“三社”各主體充分發(fā)育。通過(guò)強(qiáng)化聯(lián)動(dòng)機(jī)制各環(huán)節(jié)無(wú)縫對(duì)接,建立資源信息共享平臺(tái)系統(tǒng)從而保持“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”中供需對(duì)接的暢通。通過(guò)健全工作績(jī)效評(píng)估和信息披露機(jī)制從而實(shí)現(xiàn)聯(lián)動(dòng)各環(huán)節(jié)的公正透明。通過(guò)完善多元的資金投入和政府購(gòu)買公共服務(wù)機(jī)制從而為“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”提供持久的資金來(lái)源。
[Abstract]:The third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee put forward the goal of promoting the modernization of China's national governance system and governance ability, and focused on promoting social governance innovation. To promote the innovation of social governance, we need to change the mode of community governance as the starting point. However, how to mobilize the existing idle resources in the community to achieve effective links between resources. The formation of pluralistic and co-governance situation has become the most urgent task of the transformation of grass-roots governance in our country. Neighborhood committees, social organizations and social workers as the main body of community governance. They each bear different roles and obligations. The deepening of community grass-roots governance needs to start with these subjects, explore and practice constantly, and form a mechanism that can effectively connect the government and residents. So as to form a new pattern of social governance, which is interconnected, interoperable and complementary between the government and society, and achieve a dynamic balance. At present, the "three societies' linkage" will be carried out nationwide. Social organizations and social workers are well coordinated together to promote the effective complementarity of the three functions and to form a continuous and lasting operation of the motive force to promote the grass-roots community governance gradually deepen the effective mechanism. However. The linkage of the three societies is facing various difficulties in the concrete process of landing. Therefore, the "three societies' linkage" is deeply analyzed. It is particularly necessary to analyze the restrictive factors and push strategies of its benign operation. This paper begins with the definition of the concept and the theoretical elaboration, and makes a theoretical study on the linkage of the "three societies". At the same time, the thesis analyzes the role orientation and multi-party linkage in the benign operation of the "three societies' linkage", according to the actual situation in China. Roughly subdivide the "three societies" into government-led, project-oriented and social-social oriented. And the typical local cities are deeply analyzed. The main factors restricting the benign operation of the "three societies" are put forward corresponding strategies respectively, that is, by clarifying the respective functional boundaries of the "three societies". Give full play to the respective advantages of the "three societies" and promote the development of the main bodies of the "three societies". Through strengthening the linkage mechanism, the links of seamless docking. Establishing a platform system for Resource Information sharing to maintain the "three Society interaction" Through improving the work performance evaluation and information disclosure mechanism to realize the fairness and transparency of each link. Through perfecting the multi-element capital investment and the government purchasing public service mechanism. The linkage of the three societies provides a lasting source of funding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D669.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹海軍;;“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”的社區(qū)治理與服務(wù)創(chuàng)新——基于治理結(jié)構(gòu)與運(yùn)行機(jī)制的探索[J];行政論壇;2017年02期

2 夏紅莉;;欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”的模式選擇與策略研究[J];長(zhǎng)春工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年03期

3 王永奎;;青島市市北區(qū)阜新路街道:公益創(chuàng)投活動(dòng)的探索與實(shí)踐[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)組織;2016年15期

4 李文靜;時(shí)立榮;;“社會(huì)自主聯(lián)動(dòng)”:“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”社區(qū)治理機(jī)制的完善路徑[J];探索;2016年03期

5 王錫忠;顧建龍;;社會(huì)組織內(nèi)部治理的危機(jī)與出路[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)組織;2016年11期

6 王曉慧;;北京市社會(huì)組織品牌應(yīng)如何構(gòu)建[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)組織;2016年11期

7 陸敏;游文靜;;江蘇省鎮(zhèn)江市:以公益創(chuàng)投項(xiàng)目評(píng)估促社會(huì)組織發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)組織;2016年11期

8 穆瑩;;社會(huì)工作專業(yè)人才流失現(xiàn)象的探討[J];法制博覽;2016年13期

9 徐永祥;曹國(guó)慧;;“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”的歷史實(shí)踐與概念辨析[J];云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

10 曹志剛;;“三社聯(lián)動(dòng)”的問(wèn)題與優(yōu)化策略[J];社會(huì)治理;2016年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1488195