發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-09 12:35

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：股東投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)問(wèn)題之檢討　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 投票權(quán) 投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu) 公司治理

【摘要】：投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)早已有之，不過(guò)是The Schreiber court針對(duì)Schreiber v. Carney案例開(kāi)始對(duì)投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)予以界定，并改變了完全禁止投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)的態(tài)度，，對(duì)于通過(guò)TheSchreiber court分析的投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)持允許態(tài)度。美國(guó)特拉化州關(guān)于投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)司法實(shí)踐變革給予各國(guó)對(duì)于投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)的規(guī)制提供了經(jīng)驗(yàn)性參考，結(jié)合我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)對(duì)于投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)規(guī)制的變遷，最初我國(guó)禁止投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)符合時(shí)宜，但是隨著證券市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展，公司治理機(jī)制的完善，新型公司問(wèn)題的不斷出現(xiàn)，允許投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)，構(gòu)建投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)的規(guī)制機(jī)制已經(jīng)是我國(guó)立法所面臨的重要課題。 本文引入投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)的定義，明確投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)對(duì)于公司治理以及股東財(cái)富的重大意義。檢討反對(duì)投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)理由，得出結(jié)論：無(wú)論是從平等、異化、效率還是成本角度來(lái)看，已經(jīng)提出的完全禁止投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)理由并不成立。本文介紹了美國(guó)特拉化州關(guān)于投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)司法實(shí)踐變革，評(píng)述了The Schreiber court分析，借鑒了臺(tái)灣地區(qū)對(duì)于投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)的規(guī)制經(jīng)驗(yàn)，結(jié)合投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)的在我國(guó)的實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀、現(xiàn)行立法和規(guī)章的態(tài)度，針對(duì)未來(lái)趨勢(shì)進(jìn)而提出構(gòu)建我國(guó)投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)制度的建議，以期對(duì)于我國(guó)投票權(quán)價(jià)購(gòu)的立法完善起到些許作用。
[Abstract]:Voting price has long been available, but it was The Schreiber court that began defining the price of voting in the Schreiber v. Carney case. And changed the total ban on voting price buying attitude. Through TheSchreiber. Court analysis of the voting price purchase attitude. The United States of America on the legal practice of voting price purchase to the United States to provide empirical reference to the regulation of price purchase of voting rights. Combined with the change of the regulation of voting price purchase in Taiwan area, the prohibition of voting price purchase in our country is timely at first, but with the development of securities market and the perfection of corporate governance mechanism. With the emergence of new company problems, it is an important subject for legislation in China to allow voting price to buy and to set up the regulation mechanism of voting price purchase. This paper introduces the definition of voting price purchase, clarifies the significance of voting price purchase to corporate governance and shareholder wealth. Review the reasons against voting price purchase, and draw a conclusion: whether from equality, alienation. From the point of view of efficiency or cost, the reason that has been put forward to prohibit voting price purchase is not valid. This paper introduces the reform of judicial practice of voting price purchase in the United States of America. This paper reviews the analysis of The Schreiber court, draws lessons from Taiwan's experience in regulating voting price purchase, and combines the practical situation of voting price purchase in China. In view of the future trend, the author puts forward some suggestions on the construction of China's voting price purchase system in the light of the current legislation and regulations, in order to play a little role in perfecting the legislation of voting price purchase in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91;D922.28;F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 湯春來(lái);公司民主的實(shí)現(xiàn)與治理機(jī)制的完善[J];湖北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

2 王繼軍;股份有限公司累積投票制度研究[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1998年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 丁紹寬;公司投票機(jī)制的法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1401440