本文選題：供應(yīng)商 + 質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)　； 參考：《華東理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)經(jīng)過(guò)多年的發(fā)展,船用柴油機(jī)零件的產(chǎn)能逐年擴(kuò)大,憑借勞動(dòng)力資源充裕的優(yōu)勢(shì),我國(guó)已經(jīng)成為繼日本、韓國(guó)之后最具影響力的船用柴油機(jī)零件的生產(chǎn)國(guó)之一。2012年至今,受國(guó)際金融危機(jī)影響,船用柴油機(jī)行業(yè)也隨之跌入低谷。歐洲主要船用柴油機(jī)制造商紛紛將注意力轉(zhuǎn)移到采購(gòu)成本相對(duì)低廉的中國(guó)。MDT公司中國(guó)質(zhì)量部現(xiàn)行的抽樣檢驗(yàn)手段主要關(guān)注供應(yīng)商所供零件本身的質(zhì)量好壞,不但存在漏檢的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),也很難辨別供應(yīng)商發(fā)生質(zhì)量問(wèn)題的真正原因。這樣的供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量管理現(xiàn)狀難以滿足擴(kuò)大采購(gòu)量的公司戰(zhàn)略。針對(duì)中國(guó)供應(yīng)商建立起有效的質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系,通過(guò)改進(jìn)供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量管理水平降低因質(zhì)量缺陷產(chǎn)生的質(zhì)量風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和質(zhì)量成本,對(duì)于進(jìn)一步提高公司的采購(gòu)信心,擴(kuò)大中國(guó)零件采購(gòu)量,實(shí)現(xiàn)降低整機(jī)制造成本的戰(zhàn)略有著重要的意義。 本文對(duì)MDT公司中國(guó)質(zhì)量部的供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量管理的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了深入的剖析,提出了MDT公司中國(guó)質(zhì)量部目前在國(guó)內(nèi)供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量管理方面存在的不足并提出了解決方法。本文在國(guó)內(nèi)外供應(yīng)商績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)和質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究的基礎(chǔ)上,創(chuàng)新界定了供應(yīng)商績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的概念。建立了基于GB/T19004(IS09004)質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)模型,突破了以各種質(zhì)量獎(jiǎng)模型為主導(dǎo)模式的局限,對(duì)于GB/T19004(IS09004)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)中的推廣應(yīng)用具有積極的實(shí)踐意義。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文采用了層次分析法與灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度分析法相結(jié)合的綜合分析法對(duì)供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量績(jī)效體系進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),建立了在信息不全條件下的供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量績(jī)效測(cè)評(píng)價(jià)方法。本文提供了在信息不全條件下,為供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)提供了一種新的方法,為企業(yè)進(jìn)行客觀的供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià),改進(jìn)對(duì)供應(yīng)商的質(zhì)量管理工作提供了一種有效工具。
[Abstract]:After years of development in China, the production capacity of marine diesel engine parts has expanded year by year. With the advantage of abundant labor resources, China has become one of the most influential marine diesel engine parts after Japan and South Korea,.2012 years since the international financial crisis, the marine diesel engine industry has also fallen into a low valley. The main marine diesel engine manufacturers have shifted their attention to the relatively low cost of the purchasing cost of China's.MDT company, China's quality department. The current sampling inspection methods mainly focus on the quality of the parts supplied by the suppliers, not only the risk of leakage, but also the real reasons for the quality problems of the suppliers. The current situation of business quality management is difficult to meet the company strategy of expanding the quantity of purchasing. To establish an effective quality performance evaluation system for Chinese suppliers and to reduce the quality risk and quality cost caused by quality defects by improving the quality management level of the suppliers, to further improve the purchasing confidence of the public companies and to expand the volume of Chinese parts purchasing, The strategy of reducing the manufacturing cost of the whole machine is of great significance.
This paper makes a thorough analysis of the current situation of the quality management of the quality department of MDT company in China, and puts forward the shortcomings of the quality management of the Chinese quality department of MDT company at present and puts forward the solutions. On the basis of the research on the performance evaluation and quality performance evaluation of the suppliers at home and abroad, this paper is to define the innovation. The concept of supplier performance evaluation is established. The supplier quality performance evaluation model based on GB/T19004 (IS09004) quality performance evaluation standard has been established. It breaks through the limitations of various quality award models as the leading model, and has positive practical significance for the popularization and application of GB/T19004 (IS09004) standard in quality performance evaluation. In this paper, the comprehensive analysis method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey relational analysis is used to evaluate the quality performance system of suppliers, and the quality performance evaluation method of supplier is established under the condition of incomplete information. This paper provides a new method for the supplier quality performance evaluation under the condition of incomplete information. It is an effective tool for enterprises to carry out objective supplier quality performance evaluation and improve supplier quality management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F273.2;F416.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張樹山,金俊武,朱子榮;面向供應(yīng)鏈的供應(yīng)商評(píng)價(jià)與選擇方法研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年05期

2 馬士華,王許斌;確定供應(yīng)商評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重的一種方法[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2002年06期

3 汪邦軍;蔣家東;;質(zhì)量績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)技術(shù)在航空工業(yè)企業(yè)的應(yīng)用研究[J];航空標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化與質(zhì)量;2008年05期

4 賀金鳳;徐松杰;;不確定條件下的質(zhì)量績(jī)效測(cè)評(píng)方法[J];系統(tǒng)工程理論與實(shí)踐;2010年11期

5 錢碧波,潘曉弘,程耀東;敏捷虛擬企業(yè)合作伙伴選擇評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[J];中國(guó)機(jī)械工程;2000年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1914303