基層政府維穩(wěn)行為研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-15 11:36
【摘要】：改革開放以后，我國社會開始由計劃經(jīng)濟向市場經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型。幾十年來，經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)生了巨大的變化。經(jīng)濟取得了長足的發(fā)展，人民生活水平明顯提高。但是貧富差距、城鄉(xiāng)差距、弱勢群體、勞資矛盾等社會問題日益凸顯，群體性事件日益頻發(fā)。面對“穩(wěn)定壓倒一切”，基層政府為了強化維護社會穩(wěn)定能力，通過設(shè)立維穩(wěn)專項基金，成立專門的維穩(wěn)機構(gòu)，從資源整合和組織架構(gòu)上強化維穩(wěn)工作；同時，還在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的政績考核中加入維穩(wěn)工作實效考察，激勵領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的維穩(wěn)積極性。如此，從中央到地方構(gòu)建了一個立體化的“維穩(wěn)”龐大機構(gòu)，從各個方面投入大量的資源，來維持整個社會的穩(wěn)定和諧。盡管如此，在全國各地，群體性事件仍然時有發(fā)生，一些地方的基層干群關(guān)系依然不夠融洽、比較緊張，導(dǎo)致基層維穩(wěn)工作陷入“越維穩(wěn)越不穩(wěn)”的怪圈。 維穩(wěn)是一項極具中國特色的、被提升到關(guān)系國家長治久安層面、帶有極強治理色彩的重要工作。而基層維穩(wěn)又是整個維穩(wěn)體制的重心和難點，尤其是在社會急劇轉(zhuǎn)型的當(dāng)代中國，基層維穩(wěn)過程中公眾利益訴求表達(dá)行為呈現(xiàn)出“數(shù)量擴大、規(guī)模增加、行為激烈、誘點多發(fā)、涉及面廣、對抗性強等特點”。基層政府是維穩(wěn)的前沿陣地，處在國家治理體系中最為脆弱的節(jié)點部位。基層政府的維穩(wěn)行為直接關(guān)系到地方治理的成敗。 本文一共分為六部分。 第一部分為引言。首先闡述本文研究的緣起及其意義，主要從基層維穩(wěn)陷入“越維越不穩(wěn)”的怪圈入手引出透視基層政府維穩(wěn)行為對于破解當(dāng)前基層社會治理、維護基層穩(wěn)定具有重要意義。然后在分析大量已有研究文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，對本文的研究方法、結(jié)構(gòu)安排以及可能的創(chuàng)新之處等進(jìn)行說明。 第二部分是理論基礎(chǔ)。論述維穩(wěn)生成理論中的社會轉(zhuǎn)型理論、壓力型體制理論、社會沖突理論、風(fēng)險社會理論和社會心理理論等子理論，，維穩(wěn)管理理論又包括政府治理理論、新公共管理理論和政府職能理論。 第三部分是基層政府維穩(wěn)實踐樣態(tài)與運行模式。首先，本文通過對H省四個市縣的調(diào)查研究，對基層政府維穩(wěn)現(xiàn)狀及問題進(jìn)行了概括：（1）維穩(wěn)成本高昂化（2）維穩(wěn)管理政治化（3）維穩(wěn)目標(biāo)短期化（4）維穩(wěn)責(zé)任遞增化（5）維穩(wěn)思維非理性化。其次，提出了當(dāng)前基層政府維穩(wěn)所采取兩種通用模式：網(wǎng)羅密布的嚴(yán)控型維穩(wěn)模式和底線防守的綏靖型維穩(wěn)模式。 第四部分是基層政府維穩(wěn)行為邏輯及后果。首先，闡述市場邏輯、官僚邏輯和公共性邏輯是不同基層政府維穩(wěn)行為模式背后的三大邏輯進(jìn)路；其次，認(rèn)為基層維穩(wěn)選擇“不出事”作為目標(biāo)是由市場邏輯和官僚邏輯共同形塑的結(jié)果，而公共性邏輯才能形塑“良性的社會穩(wěn)定”的基層維穩(wěn)目標(biāo)；再次，指出基層政府壓力維穩(wěn)行為直接導(dǎo)致了基層權(quán)宜性治理和維穩(wěn)內(nèi)卷化的不利后果。 第五部分是基層政府維穩(wěn)行為的矯治策略。認(rèn)為基層政府維穩(wěn)行為應(yīng)從市場邏輯和官僚邏輯轉(zhuǎn)向公共性邏輯，從“不出事”目標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)為良性的社會穩(wěn)定為目標(biāo)使命，應(yīng)從“嚴(yán)控型”和“綏靖型”維穩(wěn)模式轉(zhuǎn)向法治型維穩(wěn)模式；應(yīng)從權(quán)宜性治理轉(zhuǎn)向基層善治。從治理與善治出發(fā)，構(gòu)建科學(xué)、和諧、長效的基層維穩(wěn)機制應(yīng)當(dāng)從以下方面入手：一是要樹立科學(xué)的維穩(wěn)觀；二是社會組織有效嵌入基層維穩(wěn)過程，為基層政府與民眾搭建溝通對話平臺；三是通過法治保障，將政府維穩(wěn)和公民維權(quán)置于規(guī)則和約束的框架內(nèi)；四是創(chuàng)新社會管理，在基層維穩(wěn)過程中實現(xiàn)多元共治，五是構(gòu)建公平正義的基層利益協(xié)調(diào)機制。 第六部分是結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening-up, our society began to transform from the planned economy to the market economy. For decades, there has been a great change in the economy and society. The economy has made great progress, and the people's living standard is obviously improved. But the social problems such as the gap between the rich and the poor, the gap between the urban and rural areas, the vulnerable groups and the labor and the labor are becoming more and more prominent. In that face of the "stability and overriding", the grass-roots government, in order to strengthen the ability to maintain social stability, has set up a special maintenance institution through the establishment of a special fund for the maintenance of social stability. To encourage the leadership of the leading cadres. In this way, a three-dimensional "Wei Wen" body is built from the central to the local, and a large amount of resources are invested in all aspects to maintain the stability and harmony of the whole society. Nevertheless, in all parts of the country, the mass incidents still happen, and some local grass-roots dry-group relations are still not harmonious and tense, resulting in the grass-roots stability work falling into the "The more stable, the more unstable it is." 's strange circle. The stability is a very Chinese characteristic, and is promoted to the long-term stability of the state of the relationship, with an extremely strong control color. It is the focus and difficulty of the whole system of stability, especially in the contemporary China with the rapid social transformation. The expression of public interest in the course of the stability of the grass-roots level is" The number is enqueued, the scale is incresed, the behavior is fit, the order point is multiple, the involvulatory is wide, the antagons is strong, and the like. ". The grass-roots government is a stable front-edge position and is the most vulnerable node in the national governance system The stability of the grass-roots government is directly related to the formation of local governance This article is divided into two categories: Part VI. First The part is the introduction. First of all, the origin and significance of this paper are described, mainly from the perspective of the expansion of the level of the basic level, the increase of the scale, the intense behavior, the multiple of the attracting, the wide range of involvement and the strong adversarial nature. It is of great importance. Then, on the basis of the analysis of a large number of existing research documents, the research methods, structural arrangements and possible innovations of this paper And the like. The part is the theoretical foundation. The theory of social transformation, the theory of pressure-type system, the theory of social conflict, the theory of risk society and the theory of social psychology are discussed. The third part is the stability of the grass-roots government. In this paper, the current situation and the problems of the basic government are summarized through the investigation and study of four cities and counties in the province. (1) The high-stability and high-cost (2) dimensional stability management is politicized (3) The stability of the stability is increased (4), and the maintenance responsibility is increased (5 Secondly, the paper puts forward two general models of the current base-level government: the strict control-type and the bottom-line protection that are densely distributed in the net. The fourth part is the base course. First of all, the logic of the market logic, the logic of the bureaucracy and the public logic are the three logical routes behind the state-of-the-job mode of the different grass-roots governments; secondly, it is thought that the basic-level stable-selection "-No, it's" is the target of the market logic and The result of the co-form of the bureaucratic logic, while the public logic can't form the base-level stability goal of the "non-accident"; once again, it is pointed out that the grass-roots government's pressure-stabilizing behavior directly leads to the right-of-the-spot governance of the grass-roots level and the fifth part is It is thought that the basic government should turn to the public logic from the logic of the market and the logic of the bureaucracy, and turn from the goal of "benign social stability" to benign social stability as the target mission, and turn from the non-accident "and the" strict control "to the rule of law-type maintenance mode; From the aspects of governance and good governance, the establishment of a scientific, harmonious and long-lasting base-level maintenance mechanism should be based on the following aspects: one is to set up a scientific view of view, and the other is the effective embedding of the social organization in the course of the stabilization of the grass-roots level as the base The government and the people set up a communication dialogue platform; third, through the guarantee of the rule of law, the government's stability and the citizen's rights are put in the framework of rules and constraints; the fourth is to innovate the social management, to realize the multiple co-treatment in the course of the stability of the grass-roots level, and the fifth is to build the grass-roots of fair and justice
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D625
本文編號：2500181
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening-up, our society began to transform from the planned economy to the market economy. For decades, there has been a great change in the economy and society. The economy has made great progress, and the people's living standard is obviously improved. But the social problems such as the gap between the rich and the poor, the gap between the urban and rural areas, the vulnerable groups and the labor and the labor are becoming more and more prominent. In that face of the "stability and overriding", the grass-roots government, in order to strengthen the ability to maintain social stability, has set up a special maintenance institution through the establishment of a special fund for the maintenance of social stability. To encourage the leadership of the leading cadres. In this way, a three-dimensional "Wei Wen" body is built from the central to the local, and a large amount of resources are invested in all aspects to maintain the stability and harmony of the whole society. Nevertheless, in all parts of the country, the mass incidents still happen, and some local grass-roots dry-group relations are still not harmonious and tense, resulting in the grass-roots stability work falling into the "The more stable, the more unstable it is." 's strange circle. The stability is a very Chinese characteristic, and is promoted to the long-term stability of the state of the relationship, with an extremely strong control color. It is the focus and difficulty of the whole system of stability, especially in the contemporary China with the rapid social transformation. The expression of public interest in the course of the stability of the grass-roots level is" The number is enqueued, the scale is incresed, the behavior is fit, the order point is multiple, the involvulatory is wide, the antagons is strong, and the like. ". The grass-roots government is a stable front-edge position and is the most vulnerable node in the national governance system The stability of the grass-roots government is directly related to the formation of local governance This article is divided into two categories: Part VI. First The part is the introduction. First of all, the origin and significance of this paper are described, mainly from the perspective of the expansion of the level of the basic level, the increase of the scale, the intense behavior, the multiple of the attracting, the wide range of involvement and the strong adversarial nature. It is of great importance. Then, on the basis of the analysis of a large number of existing research documents, the research methods, structural arrangements and possible innovations of this paper And the like. The part is the theoretical foundation. The theory of social transformation, the theory of pressure-type system, the theory of social conflict, the theory of risk society and the theory of social psychology are discussed. The third part is the stability of the grass-roots government. In this paper, the current situation and the problems of the basic government are summarized through the investigation and study of four cities and counties in the province. (1) The high-stability and high-cost (2) dimensional stability management is politicized (3) The stability of the stability is increased (4), and the maintenance responsibility is increased (5 Secondly, the paper puts forward two general models of the current base-level government: the strict control-type and the bottom-line protection that are densely distributed in the net. The fourth part is the base course. First of all, the logic of the market logic, the logic of the bureaucracy and the public logic are the three logical routes behind the state-of-the-job mode of the different grass-roots governments; secondly, it is thought that the basic-level stable-selection "-No, it's" is the target of the market logic and The result of the co-form of the bureaucratic logic, while the public logic can't form the base-level stability goal of the "non-accident"; once again, it is pointed out that the grass-roots government's pressure-stabilizing behavior directly leads to the right-of-the-spot governance of the grass-roots level and the fifth part is It is thought that the basic government should turn to the public logic from the logic of the market and the logic of the bureaucracy, and turn from the goal of "benign social stability" to benign social stability as the target mission, and turn from the non-accident "and the" strict control "to the rule of law-type maintenance mode; From the aspects of governance and good governance, the establishment of a scientific, harmonious and long-lasting base-level maintenance mechanism should be based on the following aspects: one is to set up a scientific view of view, and the other is the effective embedding of the social organization in the course of the stabilization of the grass-roots level as the base The government and the people set up a communication dialogue platform; third, through the guarantee of the rule of law, the government's stability and the citizen's rights are put in the framework of rules and constraints; the fourth is to innovate the social management, to realize the multiple co-treatment in the course of the stability of the grass-roots level, and the fifth is to build the grass-roots of fair and justice
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D625
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙元明;;論當(dāng)代中國治理目標(biāo)的基本走向[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期
2 徐勇;;“接點政治”:農(nóng)村群體性事件的縣域分析——一個分析框架及以若干個案為例[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期
3 劉芳;;協(xié)調(diào)利益關(guān)系:加強和創(chuàng)新社會管理的首要任務(wù)[J];中國井岡山干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年01期
4 王鳳翔;陳柳欽;;地方政府為本地競爭性企業(yè)提供財政補貼的理性思考[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2006年33期
5 吳理財;農(nóng)村稅費改革與“鄉(xiāng)政”角色轉(zhuǎn)換[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2001年05期
6 李永剛;;多重比大小:地方官員的隱蔽治理邏輯[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2009年02期
7 王磊;胡鞍鋼;;經(jīng)濟發(fā)展與社會政治不穩(wěn)定之間關(guān)系的實證研究——基于跨國數(shù)據(jù)的比較分析[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2010年01期
8 歐陽靜;;壓力型體制與鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)的策略主義邏輯[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2011年03期
9 洪銀興,曹勇;經(jīng)濟體制轉(zhuǎn)軌時期的地方政府功能[J];經(jīng)濟研究;1996年05期
10 周黎安;;中國地方官員的晉升錦標(biāo)賽模式研究[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2007年07期
本文編號：2500181
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2500181.html
最近更新
教材專著
