基于集約性及緊湊性理論的城市綜合體與城市空間融合的研究
本文選題:城市綜合體 + 城市空間; 參考:《合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:本文以城市化進(jìn)程的快速發(fā)展為研究的背景,以集約性和緊湊性作為觀察的視角,把和城市綜合與城市空間的融合作為研究和分析的對(duì)象。 通過(guò)實(shí)際調(diào)研、問(wèn)卷調(diào)查、層次分析以及文獻(xiàn)歸納的方法,對(duì)城市綜合體與城市空間的融合在集約性和緊湊性兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行研究和分析。本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于,,選取了與集約性和緊湊性緊密相關(guān)的指標(biāo),建立了判斷分析的層次結(jié)構(gòu)模型,并對(duì)各層級(jí)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了定性與定量的比較和分析,量化各個(gè)指標(biāo)的作用,將城市綜合體置于城市空間的層面進(jìn)行研究。 經(jīng)過(guò)研究和分析發(fā)現(xiàn): 第一,對(duì)于城市綜合體與城市空間的融合來(lái)說(shuō),集約性和緊湊性是兩個(gè)重要的內(nèi)容,這也是城市綜合體自身的特點(diǎn)和屬性所決定的。 第二,對(duì)于實(shí)現(xiàn)兩者融合的總目標(biāo),從宏觀到微觀的每個(gè)層級(jí)的指標(biāo)都發(fā)揮著不同的作用。在第二級(jí)目標(biāo)層里,緊湊性比集約性相對(duì)重要一點(diǎn);在第三級(jí)目標(biāo)層里,開(kāi)發(fā)強(qiáng)度、混合利用、可達(dá)性位于重要性的前三位;在準(zhǔn)則層里,容積率、功能種類(lèi)、區(qū)位地段位于重要性的前三位。 第三,對(duì)于實(shí)現(xiàn)不同的目標(biāo),相同的指標(biāo)所要發(fā)揮的作用是相對(duì)獨(dú)立的。對(duì)于實(shí)現(xiàn)集約性和緊湊性,第三級(jí)目標(biāo)層里的開(kāi)發(fā)強(qiáng)度和混合利用,以及準(zhǔn)則層里的容積率、建筑密度、功能種類(lèi)、功能數(shù)量與兩個(gè)目標(biāo)都有關(guān)聯(lián),但是它們各自在兩個(gè)方面所占有的權(quán)重值卻是不一樣的。 第四,通過(guò)案例的實(shí)證分析,得到層次分析法的分析結(jié)果在可達(dá)性方面與實(shí)際情況有著一定的偏差,而產(chǎn)生偏差的原因是城市中復(fù)雜的道路及交通狀況,這就要求在實(shí)際設(shè)計(jì)中對(duì)建筑、道路、城市空間的關(guān)系要有更加合理的規(guī)劃。 通過(guò)本文的研究,所得到的結(jié)論在城市綜合體的選址與設(shè)計(jì)、城市空間的規(guī)劃布局以及城市公共管理等方面都有著一定的理論意義。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the rapid development of urbanization as the background, intensive and compact as the perspective of observation, and the integration of urban synthesis and urban space as the object of study and analysis. Through the methods of actual investigation, questionnaire investigation, hierarchical analysis and literature induction, this paper studies and analyzes the integration of urban complex and urban space in two aspects: intensive and compactness. The innovation of this paper lies in the selection of indicators closely related to the intensity and compactness, the establishment of a hierarchy model of judgment and analysis, and the qualitative and quantitative comparison and analysis of the indicators at each level, and the quantification of the role of each index. Put the urban complex on the level of urban space to study. Through research and analysis, it is found that: first, for the integration of urban complex and urban space, intensity and compactness are two important contents, which is also determined by the characteristics and attributes of urban complex itself. Second, indicators at each level from macro to micro play a different role in achieving the overall goal of the integration of the two. In the second level of goal, compactness is a little more important than intensity; in the third level, development intensity, mixed utilization, and accessibility are in the first three places of importance; in the criterion level, the volume ratio, the type of function, Location is in the first three positions of importance. Third, to achieve different goals, the same indicators to play a relatively independent role. For achieving intensity and compactness, the intensity and mix of development in the third level of the target layer, and the volume ratio, building density, type of function, number of functions in the criterion layer are related to both objectives. But their weight values are different in two aspects. Fourth, through the empirical analysis of cases, it is concluded that the analytic hierarchy process results in a certain degree of deviation from the actual situation in terms of accessibility, and the reason for the deviation is the complex road and traffic situation in the city. This requires that in the actual design of the building, roads, urban space relations to have more reasonable planning. Through the research of this paper, the conclusion has certain theoretical significance in the location and design of urban complex, the planning and layout of urban space and the urban public management and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:TU247;TU984.113
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 張曉青;鄭小平;;日本城市蔓延及治理[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2009年02期
2 仇保興;;緊湊度和多樣性——我國(guó)城市可持續(xù)發(fā)展的核心理念[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年11期
3 辛飛;呂斌;;日本市區(qū)中心活性化政策研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年12期
4 胡兆量;建設(shè)緊湊型城市 設(shè)立城市土地預(yù)警制[J];城市問(wèn)題;2005年06期
5 李翅;;土地集約利用的城市空間發(fā)展模式[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2006年01期
6 方創(chuàng)琳;祁巍鋒;;緊湊城市理念與測(cè)度研究進(jìn)展及思考[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2007年04期
7 李琳;;緊湊城市中“緊湊”概念釋義[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2008年03期
8 茹強(qiáng)慧;;中國(guó)城市化歷程及面臨的問(wèn)題[J];地理教育;2008年02期
9 韓筍生,秦波;借鑒"緊湊城市"理念,實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)城市的可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];國(guó)外城市規(guī)劃;2004年06期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 汪德軍;中國(guó)城市化進(jìn)程中的土地利用效率研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2008年
2 孫根彥;面向緊湊城市的交通規(guī)劃理論與方法研究[D];長(zhǎng)安大學(xué);2012年
本文編號(hào):2076218
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2076218.html