本文選題：新公共管理理論 + 績效管理模式��； 參考：《中國行政管理》2013年09期

【摘要】：本世紀(jì)初以來,我國各級政府積極嘗試財政績效管理改革,取得了一定成效。但重新審視各地的做法,會發(fā)現(xiàn)幾乎所有的績效管理實踐都沒有將政治因素的約束考慮在內(nèi),也沒有形成一個系統(tǒng)的、統(tǒng)一成熟的模式,具體操作上也存在著一定的混亂。造成該現(xiàn)象的原因可以歸結(jié)于各地沒有很好地理解績效管理的基本原理,因而沒有處理好政策評價與績效測定之間的關(guān)系。為解決上述問題,需要重新回到新公共管理理論思維的原點,清晰界定政策評價與績效測定之間的關(guān)系。為此,本文首先在梳理新公共管理理論核心思維的基礎(chǔ)上,介紹美英兩國在績效管理實踐中成功與失敗的經(jīng)驗,最后提出我國在財政績效管理改革中應(yīng)注意解決的問題。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of this century, Chinese governments at all levels have actively tried to reform financial performance management and achieved certain results. But if we re-examine the practices, we can find that almost all the performance management practices do not take the constraints of political factors into account, nor have they formed a systematic, unified and mature model, and there is some confusion in the concrete operation. The reason for this phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that the basic principles of performance management are not well understood and the relationship between policy evaluation and performance measurement is not properly handled. In order to solve the above problems, it is necessary to return to the origin of the new public management theory and clearly define the relationship between policy evaluation and performance measurement. Therefore, based on the core thinking of the new public management theory, this paper introduces the successful and unsuccessful experiences of the United States and Britain in the practice of performance management, and finally points out the problems that should be solved in the reform of financial performance management in China.
【作者單位】： 上海財經(jīng)大學(xué)公共經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：F811

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 廖小東;曹文波;;貴州省突發(fā)自然災(zāi)害與應(yīng)急機(jī)制研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2010年27期

2 于水;張美慧;;基于層次分析法的村級農(nóng)技員績效考評指標(biāo)體系研究——以南京市為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2010年35期

3 王佳凡;;基于BSC的公共教育績效審計指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建[J];財會通訊;2010年07期

4 王敏;;檢驗檢疫系統(tǒng)預(yù)算資金績效評價完善措施淺談[J];財會通訊;2010年11期

5 衛(wèi)新;李e，

本文編號：1951407