本文選題：地方政府競爭 + 對(duì)外開放��； 參考：《城市問題》2017年12期

【摘要】：基于中國270個(gè)地級(jí)及以上城市2007-2013年的面板數(shù)據(jù),運(yùn)用空間杜賓模型分析了地方政府的生產(chǎn)性財(cái)政支出競爭、對(duì)外開放對(duì)環(huán)境污染的影響。結(jié)果顯示:城市間的環(huán)境污染在空間上存在著明顯的正向關(guān)聯(lián);地方政府競爭加劇了環(huán)境質(zhì)量的惡化;對(duì)外開放對(duì)環(huán)境污染的影響具有差異性,貿(mào)易開放加劇了環(huán)境的污染程度,引資開放對(duì)環(huán)境污染具有改善作用;在交互分析中,貿(mào)易開放加劇了地方政府競爭對(duì)環(huán)境惡化的作用,引資開放對(duì)地方政府競爭的環(huán)境污染效應(yīng)的影響不明顯;不同區(qū)域的地方政府競爭和對(duì)外開放對(duì)環(huán)境污染的影響程度存在顯著差異。
[Abstract]:Based on the panel data of 270 prefectural cities in China from 2007 to 2013, this paper analyzes the effects of local governments' productive fiscal expenditure competition and opening to the outside world on environmental pollution by using spatial Doberbin model. The results show that there is an obvious positive correlation between the environment pollution between cities, the competition of local government exacerbates the deterioration of environmental quality, and the impact of opening to the outside world on environmental pollution is different. The opening up of trade intensifies the degree of environmental pollution, and the opening up of foreign investment can improve the environmental pollution. In the interactive analysis, trade openness intensifies the role of local government competition in environmental degradation. The effect of local government competition on environmental pollution is not obvious, and the influence of local government competition and opening to the outside world on environmental pollution is significant difference in different regions.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與貿(mào)易學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大招標(biāo)項(xiàng)目(11&ZD012)
【分類號(hào)】：F125;X321
，

本文編號(hào)：1884709