發(fā)布時間：2018-05-09 09:35

  本文選題：城市社區(qū) + 治理結(jié)構(gòu)　； 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：21世紀(jì)以來，社區(qū)建設(shè)和社區(qū)治理的話題一直為理論界和學(xué)術(shù)界所關(guān)注。社區(qū)是當(dāng)代人生活的基本單元，也是城市建設(shè)的基礎(chǔ)。在民政部開展社區(qū)建設(shè)活動以來，我國出現(xiàn)了各種社區(qū)治理的模式，其中百步亭社區(qū)作為全國知名的優(yōu)秀社區(qū)，有其獨特的研究價值。多中心治理理論作為公共管理學(xué)科領(lǐng)域的前沿理論，，并且對我國城市社區(qū)治理具有重要的指導(dǎo)作用。 本文首先對社區(qū)、城市社區(qū)的概念進(jìn)行界定，然后探討了城市社區(qū)的發(fā)展、城市社區(qū)治理的一般模式。進(jìn)而，在回顧美國、加拿大以及我國武漢市武昌區(qū)、杭州市和北京市的社區(qū)治理實踐經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上，運用文獻(xiàn)分析法、問卷調(diào)查法、比較分析法、專項訪談，對百步亭社區(qū)發(fā)展的歷史進(jìn)程、社區(qū)治理的各個主體、社區(qū)治理的方式以及社區(qū)治理的成果進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)分析，剖析了百步亭社區(qū)治理的組織結(jié)構(gòu)、社區(qū)治理主體以及社區(qū)公共服務(wù)的提供。 在現(xiàn)階段，百步亭社區(qū)治理模式對其他社區(qū)的建設(shè)積累了許多成功的經(jīng)驗，但也有一定的局限性。參考多中心治理理論發(fā)現(xiàn)，百步亭社區(qū)治理的各個主體存在不平等的問題。黨組織、政府職能部門、企業(yè)三個治理主體在百步亭社區(qū)治理中發(fā)揮著重要的作用，但社區(qū)居民的參與度不高，參與渠道不足，社區(qū)公共活動的形式存在缺陷，社區(qū)內(nèi)第三部門發(fā)育嚴(yán)重不足。百步亭社區(qū)治理模式初步顯示出多中心的態(tài)勢，但距離社區(qū)治理的“善治”目標(biāo)仍有很大的距離，需要進(jìn)一步的努力。根據(jù)百步亭社區(qū)治理模式的不足，本文針對性的提出了四點措施建議，即拓寬社區(qū)居民的參與面，提高社區(qū)居民的參與熱情；積極培育第三部門和其他社區(qū)組織；豐富社區(qū)服務(wù)的內(nèi)涵，加強對社區(qū)工作著隊伍建設(shè)；加強社區(qū)軟環(huán)境建設(shè)，培育社區(qū)共同體。
[Abstract]:Since the 21 st century, the topic of community construction and community governance has been concerned by theorists and academicians. Community is the basic unit of contemporary people's life and the foundation of urban construction. Since the Ministry of Civil Affairs carried out community construction activities, there have been various modes of community governance in China, among which the Baibuting community, as a well-known outstanding community in the country, has its unique research value. As a frontier theory in the field of public management, polycentric governance theory plays an important role in guiding urban community governance in China. This paper first defines the concept of community and urban community, and then discusses the development of urban community and the general mode of urban community governance. Furthermore, on the basis of reviewing the practical experience of community governance in Wuchang District, Hangzhou City and Beijing City of Wuhan City, China, literature analysis method, questionnaire survey method, comparative analysis method and special interview are used. This paper systematically analyzes the historical process of community development, the main body of community governance, the ways of community governance and the results of community governance, and analyzes the organizational structure of community governance in Baibuting. The main body of community governance and the provision of community public service. At the present stage, the community governance model of Baibuting has accumulated many successful experiences for the construction of other communities, but it also has some limitations. Referring to the theory of polycentric governance, it is found that the main bodies of community governance in Baibu Pavilion are unequal. Party organizations, government functional departments and enterprises play an important role in the community governance of Baibu Pavilion, but the participation of community residents is not high, the participation channels are insufficient, and the form of community public activities has defects. The third sector in the community is severely underdeveloped. The community governance model of Baibuting shows the trend of multi-center initially, but it is still far from the goal of "good governance" of community governance, and needs further efforts. According to the shortcomings of the Baibuting community governance model, this paper puts forward four measures, that is, to broaden the participation of community residents, improve the enthusiasm of community residents, actively cultivate the third sector and other community organizations; Enrich the connotation of community service, strengthen the construction of community work team, strengthen the construction of community soft environment, cultivate community.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D669.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何彪,吳曉萍;西方城市社區(qū)建設(shè)歷程及其啟示[J];城市問題;2002年03期

2 謝明明;;從百步亭社區(qū)的建設(shè)看城市社區(qū)居民自治[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2009年18期

3 許鋒;劉濤;;加拿大公眾參與規(guī)劃及其啟示[J];國際城市規(guī)劃;2012年01期

4 趙延?xùn)|;社會資本理論的新進(jìn)展[J];國外社會科學(xué);2003年03期

5 閔學(xué)勤;黃燦彪;;適度的社區(qū)自治及其路徑選擇——基于香港和內(nèi)地社區(qū)治理模式的比較[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年02期

6 韓興雨;孫其昂;;現(xiàn)代化語境中城市社區(qū)治理轉(zhuǎn)型之路[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2012年01期

7 王興倫;多中心治理:一種新的公共管理理論[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期

8 陳偉東;城市基層社會管理體制變遷:單位管理模式轉(zhuǎn)向社區(qū)治理模式——武漢市江漢區(qū)社區(qū)建設(shè)目標(biāo)模式、制度創(chuàng)新及可行性研究[J];理論月刊;2000年12期

9 張菊梅;;公共服務(wù)公私合作研究——以多中心治理為視角[J];社會科學(xué)家;2012年03期

10 盧漢龍;李駿;;社區(qū)建設(shè)的歷史、現(xiàn)狀與未來[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實踐;2005年11期

本文編號：1865507