【摘要】：牌坊是中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化的一個(gè)縮影,長(zhǎng)久以來(lái)被認(rèn)為是華夏文明的象征。其作為中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)建筑發(fā)展歷程中最具有鮮明藝術(shù)特色的作品之一,不僅是中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)建筑及造型藝術(shù)領(lǐng)域的重要組成部分,還具有獨(dú)領(lǐng)風(fēng)騷的審美價(jià)值、豐富的社會(huì)功能和深厚的歷史底蘊(yùn)。 起初,牌坊是作為建筑的附屬品及裝飾品而出現(xiàn)的建筑單體,其在經(jīng)過(guò)數(shù)百年乃至數(shù)千年的歷史演變,逐漸發(fā)展成為一種紀(jì)念性的象征,是人們對(duì)人生理想的一種物化表現(xiàn),也是封建“禮制”和封建道德的一種呈現(xiàn)形式。隨著封建思想的消亡,牌坊的一些功能和意義也隨之消失,現(xiàn)在牌坊更多的被應(yīng)用于景觀的出入口或建筑群入口處,其功能主要是起到標(biāo)示和界定空間的作用。而伴隨著現(xiàn)代景觀思潮的到來(lái),牌坊的演變與發(fā)展遇到了多種多樣的瓶頸問(wèn)題,很多新建的牌坊與現(xiàn)代景觀空間格格不入,也給公眾帶來(lái)了審美的落差,以及隨著城市特色危機(jī)現(xiàn)象的日益加劇,人們對(duì)于地域性景觀的要求也越來(lái)越迫切。本文正是針對(duì)這些當(dāng)今出現(xiàn)的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,試圖通過(guò)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)牌坊的歷史背景與藝術(shù)形式的研究,探尋一條傳承牌坊文化精髓的途徑,從而為現(xiàn)代景觀空間中牌坊文化符號(hào)的設(shè)計(jì)與應(yīng)用起到一定的指導(dǎo)意義和探索價(jià)值。 本文從符號(hào)學(xué)角度出發(fā),按照從理論到方法的思路來(lái)分析和研究牌坊文化符號(hào)在景觀空間設(shè)計(jì)中的應(yīng)用。全文共分為五章。第一章主要介紹論文研究的背景知識(shí),包括研究背景、研究目的與意義、研究方法以及國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀；第二章是介紹符號(hào)學(xué)以及牌坊文化的相關(guān)理論；第三章分別從符號(hào)學(xué)的符構(gòu)、符義、符用三個(gè)理論層面剖析牌坊文化,闡述牌坊文化符號(hào)的表層及深層結(jié)構(gòu)、意義傳達(dá)機(jī)制以及與認(rèn)知主體的關(guān)系；第四章歸納牌坊文化符號(hào)可應(yīng)用的意義主題類型,總結(jié)其提取原則與方法,列舉牌坊文化符號(hào)的具體應(yīng)用手法,并探討牌坊文化符號(hào)在景觀空間設(shè)計(jì)中的應(yīng)用載體和應(yīng)用方式；第五章為結(jié)語(yǔ),總結(jié)論文的研究成果以及不足。
[Abstract]:The archway is a microcosm of Chinese traditional culture and has long been regarded as a symbol of Chinese civilization. As one of the most distinctive works in the development of Chinese traditional architecture, it is not only an important part in the field of Chinese traditional architecture and plastic arts, but also has the unique aesthetic value. Rich social function and profound historical background. At first, the archway was the building monomer that appeared as the accessory and decoration of the building. After centuries and even thousands of years of historical evolution, it gradually developed into a commemorative symbol, and it was a materialized expression of people's ideal of life. It is also a present form of feudal "etiquette" and feudal morality. With the disappearance of feudal thought, some functions and meanings of the archway also disappeared. Now the archway is more used in the entrance of the landscape or the entrance of the building group, and its function is mainly to mark and define the space. With the arrival of modern landscape trend of thought, the evolution and development of archway encountered a variety of bottlenecks, many newly built archways and modern landscape space is incompatible with the public, but also brought the aesthetic gap. And with the increasing crisis of urban characteristics, the demand for regional landscape is becoming more and more urgent. In view of these hot issues, this paper attempts to explore a way to inherit the essence of traditional archway culture by studying the historical background and art form of traditional archway. Therefore, it has certain guiding significance and exploration value for the design and application of cultural symbols of archway in modern landscape space. From the perspective of semiotics, this paper analyzes and studies the application of cultural symbols in landscape space design from theory to method. The full text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter mainly introduces the background knowledge of the thesis, including the research background, the purpose and significance of the research, the research methods and the current situation at home and abroad, the second chapter is the introduction of semiotics and the related theories of the archway culture; The third chapter analyzes the archway culture from three aspects of semiotics, namely, the symbol construction, the semiotics and the symbol, and expounds the surface and deep structure of the cultural symbol, the communication mechanism of the meaning and the relationship with the cognitive subject. The fourth chapter summarizes the meaning theme types of cultural symbols, summarizes its extraction principles and methods, enumerates the specific application of cultural symbols, and discusses the application of cultural symbols in the landscape space design carrier and application; The fifth chapter is the conclusion, summarizes the research result and the insufficiency of the thesis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東建筑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU-80;TU986

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 許康;張晶晶;馬利亞;;淺析中國(guó)古代牌坊的造型藝術(shù)[J];四川建筑科學(xué)研究;2010年06期

2 汪艷;唐文;;淺析牌坊的人文景觀意象[J];大眾文藝;2010年19期

3 金其楨;論牌坊的源流及社會(huì)功能[J];中華文化論壇;2003年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王發(fā)堂;建筑藝術(shù)鑒賞原理研究[D];天津大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2300538