【摘要】：作為公共交往的重要平臺，公共空間不僅承載著人們休閑娛樂需求，而且在推動和諧社會構(gòu)建，維系社會穩(wěn)定等方面發(fā)揮重要的作用。改革開放以來，伴隨著蘇南鄉(xiāng)村社會的快速轉(zhuǎn)型，傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村公共空間作為社會歷史的建構(gòu)物，正在快速衰退甚至消失，面臨繁重的重構(gòu)任務。但在長期重“城”輕“鄉(xiāng)”的思維下，包括公共空間在內(nèi)的鄉(xiāng)村空間長期游離在城市規(guī)劃研究之外，關于鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力方面的研究更是少有涉及。鄉(xiāng)村公共空間研究的缺失與當下如火如荼的鄉(xiāng)村規(guī)劃建設實踐形成鮮明的對比。在此背景下，以鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力為核心議題的研究具有一定的理論意義。 在對鄉(xiāng)村社會學、鄉(xiāng)村政治學、城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃學等關于鄉(xiāng)村公共空間研究進展述評的基礎上，以鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力影響因素的定性分析為切入點，根據(jù)社會與空間相互建構(gòu)和人地關系互動原理，，基于科學性、可操作性等原則，從鄉(xiāng)村公共空間的使用者和鄉(xiāng)村公共空間場所特質(zhì)兩個方面，嘗試建構(gòu)鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力評估指標體系。選取三個村落——后埠村、后莊村和農(nóng)創(chuàng)村，分別代表蘇南地區(qū)三種典型的村落類型——古村落、一般傳統(tǒng)村落和新型集中鄉(xiāng)村社區(qū)，進行較長時間的實際調(diào)研，獲取一手資料。在此基礎上，依據(jù)評估體系，對不同類型鄉(xiāng)村的公共空間、同類別的鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力進行定量比較。深入剖析不同類型蘇南鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力差異的原因，提出蘇南鄉(xiāng)村公共空間活力提升的策略。
[Abstract]:As an important platform of public communication, public space not only carries people's leisure and entertainment needs, but also plays an important role in promoting the construction of a harmonious society and maintaining social stability. Since the reform and opening up, with the rapid transformation of rural society in southern Jiangsu, the traditional rural public space, as a social historical construction, is rapidly declining or even disappearing, facing a heavy task of reconstruction. However, under the long-term thinking of attaching importance to "city" and neglecting "township", rural space, including public space, has been dissociated from the study of urban planning for a long time, and the research on the vitality of rural public space is even less concerned. The lack of rural public space research and the current rural planning and construction practice form a sharp contrast. In this context, the study of rural public space vitality as the core issue has certain theoretical significance. On the basis of a review of the research progress in rural public space, such as rural sociology, rural politics, urban and rural planning and so on, the qualitative analysis of the factors affecting the vitality of rural public space is taken as the starting point. According to the mutual construction of society and space and the interaction between human and land, based on the principles of science and maneuverability, this paper discusses the characteristics of rural public space from two aspects: the users of rural public space and the characteristics of rural public space. Try to construct the evaluation index system of rural public space vitality. Selecting three villages-Houbu Village, Houzhuang Village and Nongchuang Village, respectively, representing three typical village types in southern Jiangsu Province-ancient villages, general traditional villages and new concentrated rural communities, for a long time of actual investigation. Get first-hand information. On this basis, according to the evaluation system, the public space of different types of rural areas, the same type of rural public space vitality quantitative comparison. This paper deeply analyzes the reasons for the difference of rural public space vitality in different types of southern Jiangsu province, and puts forward the strategies for promoting the vitality of rural public space in southern Jiangsu province.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州科技學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU982.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李皓;弓弼;樊俊喜;;淺談人性化景觀設計與城市公共空間活力營造——以西安大唐通易坊商業(yè)街景觀改造設計為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2008年10期

2 章文姣;張紅艷;王飛;張濤;段大娟;李俊魁;;城市開放式公園社會向心空間使用狀況評價——以保定市競秀公園為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2008年36期

3 劉鐵梁;村落集體儀式性文藝表演活動與村民的社會組織觀念[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);1995年06期

4 余健華;周翔;;城市公共空間的活力與特征[J];重慶建筑;2006年02期

5 李萬林;;城市公共空間的活力與特征淺述[J];重慶建筑;2011年12期

6 徐煜輝;卓偉德;;城市公共空間活力要素之營建——以重慶市解放碑中心區(qū)及上海市新天地廣場為例[J];城市環(huán)境設計;2006年04期

7 汪海;蔣滌非;;城市公共空間活力評價體系研究[J];鐵道科學與工程學報;2012年01期

8 呂效華;;培育鄉(xiāng)村社會公共空間的路徑選擇——以皖北農(nóng)村為例[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2010年03期

9 李平華,陸玉麒;可達性研究的回顧與展望[J];地理科學進展;2005年03期

10 李建彬;萬婷;宋揚揚;;城市街道空間的活力要素構(gòu)成探析[J];低溫建筑技術(shù);2009年10期

本文編號：2162804