本文選題：城市規(guī)劃 + 城市屬性��； 參考：《重慶大學》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：工業(yè)化開始以后技術應用的普及，不斷加深和加快了城市工業(yè)化的發(fā)展思維及城市規(guī)劃標準化的趨勢，規(guī)劃建設的相關標準和規(guī)范建設不斷加強，且出現了追求越高越好傾向。標準化是針對重復性事物和概念所作的統(tǒng)一規(guī)定，為獲得最佳秩序而對建設活動或其結果規(guī)定共同的和重復使用的規(guī)則、導則或特性文件的活動。然而，城市自然生長而來的內在條件、多樣復雜的發(fā)展基礎及人本需求，都決定了它無法統(tǒng)一地用標準化的語言描繪和運作，也因此非常直觀地反映出，城市應具有非標準化的獨特屬性。雖然城市諸多領域需要一定的標準化保障建設秩序及規(guī)律性部門的發(fā)展，但如若完全依賴標準化，將其簡單機械的生產邏輯擴大到城市規(guī)劃標準的內容之中或過度地應用標準，則必然會產生統(tǒng)一標準模具下的千城一面，城市空間環(huán)境品質降低和城市生態(tài)資源環(huán)境破壞等諸多負面影響。 凡事皆有“度”，將自然和事理作為認識對象的客體，“度”就是主客體的統(tǒng)一和協調。程度不足或者過度，都無法獲得事物兩端狀態(tài)中的最佳平衡點，只有適度，才能達到合理的取舍、包容與統(tǒng)一。城市規(guī)劃技術標準的“適度化”，是在“求同”的原則基礎上，為“存異”創(chuàng)造機會和空間，包括對城市地域、自然基底、居民需求等差異的多方位衡量及落實。城市規(guī)劃技術標準的適度化發(fā)展，是標準完善的必然舉措，是標準從無到有再到更高形式的螺旋式上升的必然過程，也是標準化的更高級形式。由城市規(guī)劃技術標準所導致的城市建設曲折是暫時的，而其向適度化發(fā)展的總趨勢和總進程卻是改變不了的。只有將適度化的思想、原則及方法與城市規(guī)劃技術標準相結合，，從基本依據上避免規(guī)劃過程中忽略城市的個性化因素和本質精神，才能夠形成生動豐富個性鮮明的城市特色，提高城市的人居品質。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of industrialization, the popularization of technology application has deepened and accelerated the development thinking of urban industrialization and the trend of standardization of urban planning. The related standards and norms of planning and construction have been strengthened constantly, and the tendency of pursuing the higher the better has appeared. Standardization is an activity that provides common and reusable rules, guidelines or characteristic documents for construction activities or their results in order to obtain the best order according to the uniform rules for repetitive things and concepts. However, the inherent conditions of the natural growth of the city, the diverse and complex foundation of development and the need for humanism, all make it impossible to describe and operate in a unified and standardized language, and thus reflect very intuitively, Cities should have unique attributes of non-standardization. Although many fields of the city need certain standardization to guarantee the development of the construction order and the regular department, if we rely entirely on the standardization, we can extend its simple mechanical production logic to the content of the urban planning standard or apply the standard excessively. It will inevitably produce many negative effects, such as a thousand cities under the unified standard mould, the quality of urban space environment and the destruction of urban ecological resources and environment, and so on. Everything has "degree", regard nature and principle as the object of cognition, "degree" is the unity and coordination of subject and object. Lack of degree or excessive, can not obtain the best balance point in the state of both ends of things, only moderate, can achieve reasonable choice, tolerance and unity. On the basis of the principle of "seeking common ground", the "moderation" of the technical standard of urban planning is to create opportunities and spaces for "preserving differences", including the multi-directional measurement and implementation of differences in urban areas, natural bases, residents' needs, and so on. The moderate development of the technical standard of urban planning is an inevitable measure to perfect the standard, an inevitable process of the standard rising from scratch to a higher form, and a more advanced form of standardization. The twists and turns of urban construction caused by the technical standard of urban planning are temporary, but the general trend and process of moderate development can not be changed. Only by combining the moderate thought, principle and method with the technical standard of urban planning, and avoiding neglecting the individual factors and essential spirit of the city in the course of planning, can the vivid and rich characteristics of the city be formed. Improve the quality of urban human settlements.
【學位授予單位】：重慶大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU984

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 袁珍琴;關于“后現代主義在中國”的一些印象和初步思考[J];重慶師專學報;1999年02期

2 唐子來;新加坡的城市規(guī)劃體系[J];城市規(guī)劃;2000年01期

3 張庭偉;城市的兩重性和規(guī)劃理論問題[J];城市規(guī)劃;2001年01期

4 王凱;從西方規(guī)劃理論看我國規(guī)劃理論建設之不足[J];城市規(guī)劃;2003年06期

5 周劍云;戚冬瑾;;我國城市用地分類的困境及改革建議[J];城市規(guī)劃;2008年03期

6 吳良鏞;芒福德的學術思想及其對人居環(huán)境學建設的啟示[J];城市規(guī)劃;1996年01期

7 方瀾,于濤方,錢欣;戰(zhàn)后西方城市規(guī)劃理論的流變[J];城市問題;2002年01期

8 趙民;汪軍;;重構我國城市規(guī)劃建設用地標準及控制體系的探討[J];城市規(guī)劃學刊;2007年06期

9 扈萬泰;宋思曼;;城市規(guī)劃科學化的若干思考[J];城市規(guī)劃學刊;2010年03期

10 朱梅白;城市特色芻議——構成、特征與發(fā)掘[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設;2002年09期

本文編號：2034585