本文選題：保障性社區(qū) + 公共服務設施��； 參考：《廈門大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,我國經(jīng)濟持續(xù)高速增長,而經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的非均衡性,導致我國貧富差距問題日益突出,區(qū)域、城鄉(xiāng)、行業(yè)間的收入差距不斷增大。由于收入差異所引起的社會經(jīng)濟地位的差異,使富人過多占有資源、優(yōu)先占有優(yōu)質(zhì)資源,甚至搶奪公共資源和公共服務。然而,公共資源和公共服務占有的非均衡性進一步加劇了低收入群體和高收入群體生活質(zhì)量上的差距。為了體現(xiàn)公平正義原則,并提供人們生存和發(fā)展最基本的公共服務,我國提出了基本公共服務均等化政策,旨在提供均等的服務,最終達到均等的效果。必須要指出,共享改革發(fā)展成果的實質(zhì)是“享受均等”,而“享受均等”的前提便是“供給均等”。 本文選取廈門市保障性社區(qū)為研究對象,從交通成本的角度對廈門市保障性社區(qū)公共服務設施配置情況進行了實證研究。公共服務設施作為公共服務的空間載體,人們必須以出行作為獲取該服務的基本手段,這將進一步涉及到交通方式的選擇。不同的交通工具一般在交通成本(出行時間、出行距離)有所差異,進而使人們選擇不同的交通工具以滿足不同等級規(guī)模的服務。由于保障性社區(qū)居民主要采用步行、自行車、公交等交通工具,本文將保障性社區(qū)的空間劃分為三個等級,即步行可達范圍、自行車可達范圍、以及公交可達范圍,利用ArcGIS軟件和層次分析法等分析方法,求出了不同交通可達范圍內(nèi)的公共服務設施配置情況。評價方法上,采用了相對性評價和絕對性評價方式,分別評價了保障性社區(qū)間公共服務配置的公平程度和保障性社區(qū)在整個城市環(huán)境內(nèi)公共服務設施配置的公平程度。這對于實現(xiàn)“宜居廈門”、“幸福廈門”,完善“住房保障的廈門藍本”,具有重大的現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has been growing at a high speed, and the imbalance of economic development has led to an increasingly prominent gap between the rich and the poor in China. The income gap between regions, urban and rural areas and industries is increasing. Because of the difference of social and economic status caused by the income difference, the rich people occupy too much resources, preferentially occupy the high quality resources, and even seize the public resources and public services. However, the disequilibrium of public resources and public services further exacerbates the quality of life gap between low-income and high-income groups. In order to embody the principle of fairness and justice and to provide people with the most basic public services for survival and development, China has put forward the policy of equalization of basic public services, aiming at providing equal services and achieving the effect of equality. It must be pointed out that the essence of sharing the fruits of reform and development is "enjoy equality", and the premise of "enjoyment equality" is "equal supply". This paper makes an empirical study on the allocation of public service facilities in the indemnificatory community in Xiamen from the point of view of transportation cost. Public service facilities as the space carrier of public services, people must take travel as the basic means to obtain this service, which will further involve the choice of transportation mode. Different modes of transportation are generally different in transportation cost (travel time, travel distance), which makes people choose different vehicles to meet different levels of service. Because the residents of the indemnificatory community mainly use the means of transportation such as walking, bicycle and public transportation, this paper divides the space of the indemnificatory community into three levels, that is, the range of walking, the range of bicycle, and the range of public transportation. By using ArcGIS software and Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the allocation of public service facilities in different traffic range is obtained. In terms of evaluation methods, relativity evaluation and absolute evaluation are adopted to evaluate the fair degree of public service allocation between indemnificatory communities and the fair degree of public service facilities allocation in the whole urban environment. This is of great practical significance for realizing "livable Xiamen", "happy Xiamen" and perfecting "Xiamen model of housing security".
【學位授予單位】：廈門大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU984.12

【引證文獻】

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 梁捷;尋求一致的公平理論[D];復旦大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1998787