本文選題：攤販 + 街道空間　； 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)城市僅用30多年時(shí)間就走完了西方近200年的城市化路程。大量的鄉(xiāng)-城移民涌入城市,帶來(lái)了城市經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,也帶來(lái)了諸多城市問(wèn)題。攤販經(jīng)濟(jì)的繁榮是現(xiàn)今中國(guó)城市化浪潮的必然結(jié)果,在政府對(duì)攤販的積極鼓勵(lì)與消極打壓之間,那些闖入城市的攤販們經(jīng)歷了怎樣的城市化過(guò)程?一個(gè)夜市從繁榮到消亡,它的歷史也承載著一群鄉(xiāng)-城移民的城市謀生史。本文描述了M夜市攤販們的這一城市經(jīng)歷,希望提供一個(gè)城市化背景下的群體生活變遷案例。本文以攤販的城市經(jīng)歷為主線,描述了他們“人的城市化”過(guò)程。在夜市繁榮時(shí)期,攤販們?cè)诔鞘袆?chuàng)造出一個(gè)屬于他們的“地方”,區(qū)域性地融入了城市。然而,隨著街道空間被不斷細(xì)分,公共空間中的矛盾也日益尖銳。“臟、亂、差”的空間形象有悖于國(guó)家權(quán)力對(duì)現(xiàn)代城市空間的想象,因此夜市被政府強(qiáng)制取締。攤販們進(jìn)行了強(qiáng)烈的抗?fàn)?但他們的城市夢(mèng)就此中斷。根據(jù)筆者后期所做的調(diào)查,夜市中年紀(jì)較大、思想保守的“傳統(tǒng)攤販”都被趕到了城市邊緣,有些人甚至被甩出了城市,回到農(nóng)村老家。國(guó)家權(quán)力對(duì)空間的介入是本文的另一條隱蔽的脈絡(luò),它是攤販們城市經(jīng)歷背后社會(huì)機(jī)制的一部分。隨著城市的發(fā)展,夜市區(qū)域已經(jīng)由以前的城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部變成了商業(yè)副中心,國(guó)家權(quán)力想象中的現(xiàn)代城市空間應(yīng)該是暢通、干凈、整潔、國(guó)際化的,因此“影響市容”的夜市已經(jīng)不適合存在于“主干道”之上；另外,隨著城市空間的擴(kuò)張,國(guó)家權(quán)力與中產(chǎn)階級(jí)的空間想象開(kāi)始合二為一,不僅要消滅像M夜市這樣“沒(méi)有品味”的空間,還要將該地區(qū)舊的民房大量拆除,以給未來(lái)的商品房騰出更多空間。空間的進(jìn)一步“城市化”并沒(méi)有和攤販的城市化協(xié)同起來(lái)。在M地區(qū)的空間越來(lái)越整潔通行、越來(lái)越國(guó)際化、中產(chǎn)階層化的同時(shí),以前的傳統(tǒng)攤販則被城市越推越遠(yuǎn)。
[Abstract]:Chinese cities have completed nearly 200 years of urbanization in the West in just over 30 years. A large number of township-city immigrants poured into the city, brought about the development of urban economy, but also brought a lot of urban problems. The prosperity of vendors' economy is the inevitable result of the current Chinese urbanization tide. What kind of urbanization process did the vendors who entered the city experience between the positive encouragement of the government to the vendors and the negative suppression? The history of a night market, from prosperity to extinction, also bears the urban livelihood of a group of township-city immigrants. This paper describes the experience of M night market vendors in this city, hoping to provide a case of group life changes in the context of urbanization. Based on the city experience of vendors, this paper describes their "urbanization" process. During the boom of the night market, vendors created a place in the city that belonged to them and integrated regionally into the city. However, with the subdivision of street space, the contradictions in public space are increasingly sharp. The "dirty, messy, poor" spatial image is contrary to the imagination of the state power to the modern urban space, so the night market is banned by the government. The vendors fought fiercely, but their urban dreams were cut off. According to the investigation made by the author in the later period, the older and conservative "traditional vendors" in the night market were driven to the edge of the city, and some people were even thrown out of the city and returned to their hometown in the countryside. The intervention of state power in space is another hidden thread of this paper, which is a part of the social mechanism behind the experiences of vendors in cities. With the development of the city, the night market area has changed from the former urban and rural areas to the commercial sub-center. The modern urban space in the imagination of the state power should be smooth, clean, neat and international. As a result, night markets that "affect the city's appearance" are no longer suitable for existence on the "main roads"; in addition, with the expansion of urban space, state power and the spatial imagination of the middle class begin to merge into one. It is not only necessary to eliminate the "no taste" space such as M Night Market, but also to demolish the old houses in the area in large numbers to make more space for the future commercial houses. The further "urbanization" of space does not coordinate with the urbanization of vendors. In M area, the space is cleaner and cleaner, more international, more middle class, while the former traditional vendors are pushed further and further away by the city.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.113

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 承孝相;;“小北京”——朝外Soho[J];建筑技藝;2010年01期

2 ;朱小地[J];世界建筑;2014年04期

3 楊震;齊軍;;邯鄲城市的變遷[J];城建檔案;2007年02期

4 徐道鈁;上海城市綜合交通規(guī)劃方案簡(jiǎn)述(下)[J];上海建設(shè)科技;2000年03期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄒晨新;M夜市的繁榮與消亡：一群鄉(xiāng)—城移民攤販的城市經(jīng)歷[D];南京大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1805488