本文選題：徽商宅居庭院 + 晉商宅居庭院　； 參考：《北京林業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：宅居庭院空間作為傳統(tǒng)民居的重要組成部分,是居民生活與開展日常活動的主要空間。徽州民居與山西民居作為中國傳統(tǒng)民居中的兩大分支,素有“南徽北晉”之說。明清時期徽商與晉商的相繼崛起,對于兩地民居的發(fā)展與成熟具有很大的推進作用。本文重點研究明清時期的徽商與晉商的宅居庭院空間,旨在通過比較,能夠更深刻的理解兩者所表現(xiàn)的不同特質(zhì)的原因,同時也希望在理解其特質(zhì)的基礎(chǔ)上更好的傳承與保護傳統(tǒng)民居這一寶貴文化遺產(chǎn)。本文就庭院的相關(guān)文獻資料予以收集、整理,對庭院的功能、分類、空間構(gòu)成要素作簡要的闡述之后,以此作為基礎(chǔ)切入到徽商與晉商宅居庭院空間的研究。論文以徽商與晉商現(xiàn)存的一些宅居作為主要的調(diào)研對象,以調(diào)研得出的資料作為依據(jù),分析兩者宅居庭院的選址、平面布局、空間構(gòu)成要素與空間處理手法等。在對兩者進行比較分析后,找出它們的異同,并從宅居庭院空間的影響因素上尋求形成這種異同的根源。此外,論文更是以兩者宅居的代表——承志堂與王家大院視履堡作為典型個案,對兩者的庭院進行測繪,從其空間的尺度、布局、空間處理手法上進行比較分析。通過比較分析,本文得出了以下結(jié)論：1.兩者的興建緣由都是衣錦還鄉(xiāng),以宅居展現(xiàn)其實力。2.兩者建筑形態(tài)主要受自然環(huán)境與社會文化影響,在色彩、材料、裝飾、門的形態(tài)上都有與之相關(guān)的差別產(chǎn)生。3.兩者的布局中,庭院空間都主次分明,起到改善環(huán)境的作用,但兩者對于庭院空間的利用方式不同。4.流線組織上,兩者的等級與功能并重,與空間布局關(guān)系密切,徽晉各有特色。5.兩者的空間構(gòu)成元素表象迥異,但內(nèi)涵和諧統(tǒng)一。6.兩者通過對環(huán)境的適應(yīng)而表現(xiàn)出獨特的風(fēng)格,從而形成庭院——建筑—一聚落這一系列的可識別性空間,值得在現(xiàn)有的城市規(guī)劃中借鑒,能夠在一定程度上改善“千城一面”的現(xiàn)象。
[Abstract]:Residential courtyard space, as an important part of traditional residence, is the main space for residents to live and carry out daily activities.As two branches of Chinese traditional houses, Huizhou and Shanxi are known as "Southern Emblem and Northern Jin".The rise of Huizhou merchants and Shanxi merchants in Ming and Qing dynasties played an important role in the development and maturity of residential houses.This paper focuses on the residential courtyard space of Huizhou merchants and Shanxi merchants in Ming and Qing dynasties, in order to understand the reasons for the different characteristics of the two through comparison.At the same time, I hope to inherit and protect the precious cultural heritage of traditional residence better on the basis of understanding its characteristics.This paper collects and arranges the relevant documents of the courtyard, expounds the function, classification, and space elements of the courtyard, and takes it as the foundation to study the courtyard space of Huizhou merchants and Shanxi merchants.This paper takes some existing dwelling houses of Huizhou merchants and Shanxi merchants as the main objects of investigation, based on the data obtained from the investigation, analyzes the siting, plane layout, space composition elements and spatial handling techniques of the residential courtyard of Huizhou merchants and Shanxi merchants.After comparative analysis, the author finds out their similarities and differences, and seeks to form the root of the similarities and differences from the influencing factors of residential courtyard space.In addition, the thesis takes Chengzhitang and Wangjia courtyard as typical cases, and makes a comparative analysis on their space scale, layout and spatial processing techniques.Through comparative analysis, this paper draws the following conclusion: 1.Both of the reasons for the construction is to return to their homes to show their strength. 2.The two architectural forms are mainly influenced by natural environment and social culture. There are related differences in color, material, decoration and door morphology.In the layout of the two, the courtyard space is clear, plays the role of improving the environment, but the use of the courtyard space is different between the two. 4. 4.In streamline organization, both grades and functions are of equal importance, and are closely related to the spatial layout, and each of them has its own characteristics.The spatial composition of the two elements is very different, but the connotation is harmonious and unified. 6.By adapting to the environment, they exhibit a unique style, thus forming a series of identifiable spaces such as courtyard, architecture and settlement, which are worthy of reference in the existing urban planning.It can improve the phenomenon of "one thousand cities" to some extent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU241.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 臧麗娜;;明清徽州民居風(fēng)格形成之民俗背景淺析[J];民俗研究;2006年03期

2 王海濤;;淺談徽州古民居的建筑裝飾藝術(shù)與文化觀念[J];揚州職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年02期

3 靳亦冰;;山西民居與大院文化[J];國土資源;2006年04期

4 喬飛;;徽州民居建筑裝飾藝術(shù)及造型的象征意義[J];山西建筑;2006年01期

5 陳爾鶴,趙景逵,趙慎;山西古代私家園林概述[J];文物世界;2005年03期

，

本文編號：1757280