發(fā)布時間：2018-02-28 06:23

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 建構(gòu) 后鋒 消解 批判實踐　出處：《天津大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：肯尼思·弗蘭普頓重提“建構(gòu)”文化研究為建筑學(xué)術(shù)界找到了創(chuàng)建學(xué)科自主性的契機,但同時,這種渴望清理出一個徹底擺脫意識形態(tài)控制的本體文化的迫切心態(tài),使許多學(xué)者并能未充分理解“建構(gòu)”提出的深厚背景及其本身所具有的復(fù)雜性和批判張力,這導(dǎo)致“建構(gòu)”研究目前在中國仍停留在一種現(xiàn)代理性主義的知識體系內(nèi),其現(xiàn)象學(xué)的批判實踐性在這種壓制的狀態(tài)下未能發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的活力。另一個問題是,目前對“建構(gòu)”的讀解多追求一種典型性或紀(jì)念性,其無疑極大程度縮窄了“建構(gòu)”研究的豐富度,也使它承擔(dān)了過于鮮明的表現(xiàn)任務(wù)。因此,本文將試圖站在“抵抗建筑學(xué)”的“后鋒”立場,破除那種以“建構(gòu)”談建構(gòu)的理論內(nèi)視角,在人類學(xué)和語言學(xué)的層面,將其視作一種“建造”的“構(gòu)成活動”,以“消解”式的讀解方式還原“建構(gòu)”文化的廣泛視域,并以方法論的批判將建構(gòu)真正引向一種精密的語言讀解和制作中。因為此特殊視角,本文將盡量避免推演式的論述方式,而嘗試一次跨學(xué)科、跨理論的寫作。文章將從廣泛的建構(gòu)營造活動入手,貫穿前現(xiàn)代、現(xiàn)代和后現(xiàn)代的不同視角,在學(xué)科內(nèi)與外,“建造”與“詩意”、“先鋒”與“后鋒”、“理論”與“實踐”、“宏觀”與“精密”、“不在場”與“在場”等概念的對話中搭建起一個多維視域,以期對建構(gòu)文化研究的學(xué)者有一定啟示作用。
[Abstract]:Kenneth Frampton repeats the idea that "constructive" cultural research provides the architectural academic community with an opportunity to create discipline autonomy, but at the same time, this desire to clean up an urgent mindset of the ontological culture that is completely free from ideological control. So that many scholars can not fully understand the profound background of "construction" and its complexity and critical tension, which leads to the fact that the study of "construction" is still in the knowledge system of modern rationalism in China. Its phenomenological criticism and practice failed to give play to its proper vitality in this state of repression. Another problem is that the interpretation of "construction" at present pursues a kind of typicality or memoriality. Undoubtedly, it greatly narrows the richness of the study of "construction" and makes it take on the task of expressing itself too clearly. Therefore, this paper will try to stand on the "rear front" position of "resistance architecture". From the perspective of the theory of "construction", we regard it as a kind of "constructive activity" in anthropology and linguistics, and restore the extensive horizon of "construction" culture by "dispelling" the way of reading. And the criticism of methodology will lead to the construction of a precise language interpretation and production. Because of this special perspective, this paper will try to avoid the deductive way of discourse, and try to cross the subject. The article will start with extensive construction activities and run through the different perspectives of pre-modern, modern and post-modern. Within and outside the discipline, a multidimensional horizon is built in the dialogue of concepts such as "construction" and "poetry", "pioneer" and "rear front", "theory" and "practice", "macro" and "precision", "absence" and "presence". With a view to the construction of cultural research scholars have a certain enlightenment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU20

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張輝;當(dāng)代建筑的建構(gòu)表現(xiàn)[D];重慶大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1546132