本文關(guān)鍵詞： 金融行業(yè)并購 并購績效 因子分析 數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自20世紀(jì)90年代以來,世界經(jīng)濟(jì)呈現(xiàn)出金融自由化和經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化兩大特點(diǎn),全球的金融業(yè)再度掀起了并購的浪潮。各國的金融企業(yè)都將不約而同的選擇并購作為其搶占市場份額、提高競爭實(shí)力、擴(kuò)大企業(yè)規(guī)模的手段。根據(jù)國際金融業(yè)的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn),并購無疑是一種擴(kuò)大規(guī)模的重要途徑,也是提高金融企業(yè)綜合實(shí)力的有效方法。然而如果從績效評估的角度出發(fā),金融業(yè)的并購是否如我們所期望的那樣有效率且達(dá)到企業(yè)并購的目的還有待進(jìn)一步研究。本文就是著眼于這一點(diǎn),首先對并購績效理論以及并購動因進(jìn)行梳理,進(jìn)而在前人理論成果的基礎(chǔ)上對我國金融行業(yè)上市公司并購績效進(jìn)行深入分析。一方面從理論上對我國金融業(yè)上市公司的并購現(xiàn)狀、影響因素及機(jī)理進(jìn)行了整理分析;另一方面,首先對財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)采用因子分析方法,對所選定樣本在并購發(fā)生前一年、當(dāng)年和后兩年的績效進(jìn)行評估,而后對由于并購行為給企業(yè)績效水平帶來的影響進(jìn)行了分析;繼而采用DEA數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法對之前所選取的樣本進(jìn)行了簡單分析以對我國金融業(yè)上市公司的并購績效情況做以補(bǔ)充說明。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn),首先,我國金融業(yè)上市公司未必都能夠如預(yù)期的那樣通過并購提高效率;其次,由于資源整合時(shí)滯性的存在,并購行為所帶來的績效改善往往在短期很難體現(xiàn)出來;最后通過對金融企業(yè)的進(jìn)一步行業(yè)細(xì)分后發(fā)現(xiàn)證券、保險(xiǎn)、商業(yè)銀行等不同類型的金融企業(yè),其并購績效存在差異,其中除證券業(yè)的并購績效水平顯著提升外,其他細(xì)分行業(yè)的并購績效水平都不理想。并針對這些結(jié)論提出了相應(yīng)的建議:即要從轉(zhuǎn)變并購方式;注重并購整合;培育中介機(jī)構(gòu)和推動混業(yè)經(jīng)營這四個(gè)大方面來對我國金融業(yè)并購的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行改善。
[Abstract]:Since 1990s, the world economy has been characterized by financial liberalization and economic globalization. The global financial industry has set off a wave of mergers and acquisitions once again. The financial enterprises of all countries will choose mergers and acquisitions as their share of the market and improve their competitive strength. According to the development experience of the international financial industry, M & A is undoubtedly an important way to expand the scale of enterprises. It is also an effective way to improve the comprehensive strength of financial enterprises. However, if we start from the point of view of performance evaluation. Whether the M & A of the financial industry is as efficient as we expected and to achieve the purpose of M & A. this paper focuses on this point, first of all, the theory of M & A performance and the motivation of M & A are combed. Then on the basis of previous theoretical results, the performance of listed companies in financial industry in China is analyzed. On the one hand, the current situation of M & A of listed companies in financial industry in China is theoretically analyzed. The influencing factors and mechanism were analyzed. On the other hand, the first factor analysis method is used to evaluate the performance of the selected samples one year before the M & A, the current year and two years after the merger. Then it analyzes the influence of M & A on the performance level of enterprises. Then we use the DEA data envelopment method to analyze the sample selected before in order to explain the M & A performance of listed companies in the financial industry of our country. First of all, we find out. The listed companies in China's financial sector may not be able to improve their efficiency through mergers and acquisitions as expected; Secondly, due to the existence of time lag in resource integration, the performance improvement brought about by M & A is often difficult to reflect in the short term. Finally, through the further industry segmentation of financial enterprises, we find that there are differences in M & A performance of different types of financial enterprises, such as securities, insurance, commercial banks and so on, in which the level of M & A performance of securities industry is significantly improved. The level of M & A performance of other subdivision industries is not ideal. The corresponding suggestions are put forward in view of these conclusions: to change the mode of M & A; Pay attention to merger and acquisition integration; To improve the present situation of financial M & A in China, we should cultivate intermediary organizations and promote mixed operation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F271;F832.3;F830.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賴步連;楊繼東;周業(yè)安;;異質(zhì)波動與并購績效——基于中國上市公司的實(shí)證研究[J];金融研究;2006年12期

2 張麗哲;;大銀行間并購績效不顯著的原因分析——基于規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)與規(guī)模邊界的解釋[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年10期

3 郭妍;我國商業(yè)銀行效率決定因素的理論探討與實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];金融研究;2005年02期

4 葛兆強(qiáng);銀行并購、商業(yè)銀行成長與我國銀行業(yè)發(fā)展[J];國際金融研究;2005年02期

5 陳璐;銀行并購實(shí)證研究的發(fā)展及方法論演進(jìn)[J];金融研究;2005年01期

6 范小云,李澤廣;銀行業(yè)并購重組的創(chuàng)值悖論:經(jīng)驗(yàn)解釋及其啟示[J];國際金融研究;2005年01期

7 姚樹潔,馮根福,姜春霞;中國銀行業(yè)效率的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年08期

8 劉琛,宋蔚蘭;基于SFA的中國商業(yè)銀行效率研究[J];金融研究;2004年06期

9 馬紅霞;歐盟銀行業(yè)并購的特點(diǎn)及其績效分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年05期

10 王保忠;銀行并購微觀效應(yīng)分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2004年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張渠;銀行國際化并購與績效研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

2 胡罡;中國銀行業(yè)并購研究：動因、效應(yīng)及模式選擇[D];湖南大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉黎平;我國商業(yè)銀行并購績效研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1464863